Fang et al.—Ordovician actinocerid nautiloids from Tibet
P. yaliense has shorter septal necks and denser camerae than other species of Pomphoceras.
Family Wutinoceratidae Shimizu and Obata, 1936 emend Flower, 1968
Genus Wutinoceras Shimizu and Obata, 1936 Type species.—Nybyoceras foerstei Endo, 1930
Wutinoceras cf. W. foerstei (Endo, 1930) Figures 4.2, 5.1–5.3
1930 Nybyoceras foerstei Endo, p. 298, pl. 60, figs. 1a–c.
1932 Nybyoceras foerstei; Endo, p. 79, pl. 25, figs. 3–5, pl. 26, figs. 9, 10.
1933 Nybyoceras foerstei; Teichert, p. 145, pl. 10, figs. 9, 10. 1936 Wutinoceras foerstei; Shimizu and Obata, p. 263.
1957 Nybyoceras foerstei; Yü and Chao, p. 233, pl. 128, figs. 9, 10.
1965 Wutinoceras foerstei; Chao et al., p. 62, pl. 15, figs. 1, 2.
Occurrence.—Lhasai Formation, Darriwilian (Middle Ordovi- cian), near Lhasai village, about 26km east of Xiongmei town, Xainza County, North Tibet.
Description.—Specimen NIGP166261 is a 101mm long frag- ment of an incomplete straight chamber, 65mm in diameter, with conch cross section nearly circular. External shell wall is not preserved. There are 4.8 camerae in the length of the cor- responding conch. The siphuncle is ventral in position. The siphuncle wall consists of long recumbent cyrtochoanitic septal necks and thick connecting rings. The ratios of maximum dia- meter of connecting ring per corresponding conch diameter are about 0.36. SCR ranges from 2.2 to 2.9. The diameter of the septal foramina is 4.6mm. The brims are short, 0.4mm in length, and septal necks are 0.8mm in length. The segments connect with the bottom of the septa on the dorsal side and connect with the top of the septa on the ventral side. Cameral deposits are better developed at the episeptal-mural and hypo- septal positions in the anterior. Siphuncular deposits developed in the central canal. The central canal is probably 2.0mm in diameter. Distal ends of radial canals are nearly horizontal with perispatial deposits.
Material.—An incomplete orthocone cut and polished in med- ian section. NIGP166261.
Remarks.—The external construction, conch shape, and siphuncular characteristics of this specimen are the same as those of the type material of Wutinoceras foerstei (Endo, 1930), but this specimen has the longer septal necks and narrower brim, which may be the result of bad cutting and polishing. Conse- quently, this specimen has been identified as Wutinoceras cf. W. foerstei (Endo, 1930). The species is most similar to Wutinoceras lui Chang, 1959 with regard to the position and construction of the siphuncle, except that the segments of W. lui are not in contact with the top of the septa on the ventral side. W. remotum Chen, 1975 has sparser camerae with 3–3.5 camerae in the length of the corresponding conch and
405
segments are not in contact with the bottom of the septa on the dorsal side. W. moeseini (Thein, 1968) has a subventral siphuncle and longer brims, which differs from W. foerstei. W. robustum (Kobayashi and Matumoto, 1942) from the Darriwllian of Malaysia (Stait and Burrett,1982) was assigned to W. moeseini (see Niko and Sone, 2014) because the SCR of this specimen is approximately 2.0, which is smaller than that of W. foerstei.
Genus Mesowutinoceras Chen, 1976 Type species.—Mesowutinoceras discoides Chen, 1976
Mesowutinoceras giganteum Chen in Chen and Zou, 1984 Figures 4.8, 6.6
1984 Mesowutinoceras giganteum Chen in Chen and Zou, p. 75, text-fig. 24, pl. 5, fig. 3, pl. 6, figs. 13, 14.
Occurrence.—Lhasai Formation, Darriwilian (Middle Ordovi- cian), near Lhasai village, about 26km east of Xiongmei town, Xainza County, North Tibet.
Description.—A large orthoconic fragment is available that is 29mm in length and 20mm in width, with only its dorsal side preserved. Siphuncle is subcentral in position. Siphuncular wall consists of long recumbent cyrtochoanitic septal necks and thick connecting rings. Brims are relatively long and adnation area is broad. Ratios of maximum diameter of connecting ring per corresponding conch diameter are about 0.48; segment is ellipsoid. Cameral deposits weakly developed at episeptal and hyposeptal positions. Siphuncular deposits are filling siphuncle. Central canal is unknown and perpendicular to radial canal. Distal ends of radial canals are anastomosing with peri- spatium near the most inflated portions of connecting rings.
Material.—A large orthocone cut and polished in median section. NIGP166266.
Remarks.—This specimen is very similar to M. giganteum described by Chen in Chen and Zou (1984) from the Ordos area because of its large size, subcentral siphuncle position, ellip- soidal segment, and recumbent septal necks, except that only the dorsal side of the specimen studied herein is preserved. This species differs from the type species M. discoides (Chen, 1976) from the Shandong area in being larger and having awider body size and wider segments.
Family Armenoceratidae Troedsson, 1926 Genus Armenoceras Foerste, 1924
Type species.—Actinoceras hearsti Parks, 1913.
Armenoceras tani (Grabau, 1922) Figures 4.4, 7.5, 7.7, 7.8
1922 Actinoceras tani Grabau, p. 80, pl. 7, figs. 4–7. 1932 Armenoceras hatai Endo, p. 86, pl. 18, figs. 1–3.
1932 Armenoceras tani; Endo, p. 99, pl. 21, fig. 7, pl. 14, fig. 2, pl. 40, fig. 3.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220