426
Journal of Paleontology 92(3):412–431
Figure 12. Early shell of Discoceras lindstroemi n. sp.; arrows indicate appearance of growth lines, cc indicates a change in shell coiling. (1) RM Mo 59442, lateral view, counterpart, Färö, Slite beds, late Sheinwoodian. Growth ridges regularly spaced, visible from first half of whorl. Minor shell damage seen dorsolaterally at one and one-half whorls; (2, 3) RM Mo 59420, lateral view, Othem, Samsugun, Slite beds, late Sheinwoodian; (4) RM Mo 59422, lateral view, specimen with well-developed lateral furrow, Othem, Samsugun, Slite beds, late Sheinwoodian. Specimens in Figure 12.1, 12.3, and 12.4 coated with ammonium chloride before photographing. Scale bars 5mm.
clear evidence indicating hatching time in Discoceras. More likely, the hatchling possessed a curved shell (one-half or greater than three-quarters of a whorl) with two/three phragmo- cone chambers. Early hatched specimens thus differed in life from adults; the large volume of the first phragmocone chamber and the undeveloped hyponomic sinus suggest a macroplanktic habit. This is consistent with the early development of the evolutionarily youngest tarphycerid, Ophioceras (Turek and Manda, 2016). Longer chambers in the first whorl may be linked with accelerated growth before the shell reached one whorl, resulting in a stable shell orientation and higher rigidity of the shell.
Heteromorph shell in Discoceras
Silurian Discoceras shows shell morphology and habitat derived directly from Ordovician species. However, D. lindstroemi n. sp. (Figs. 4, 5) possesses a heteromorphic shell and elaborate sculpture. The early shell of D. lindstroemi n. sp. is tightly coiled, but subsequently, during growth, the second whorl becomes loosely coiled and then reverts again to being
tightly coiled (a slight indication of a second decoiling may once again appear; Fig. 13.3). In adult specimens, the final growth stage of the shell is straight. Changes in shell coiling resulted in a change in both the aperture orientation of the animal and the hydrodynamic properties of the shell (Chamberlain, 1976, 1981; Naglik et al., 2015). Growth stages with tightly coiled shells were nektonic, with the aperture oriented forward as in other tarphycerids (e.g., Flower, 1957; Westermann, 1998). In the growth stage with a loosely coiled shell, and in the adult stage possessing a protruding adapertural part of the shell, the aperture was oriented obliquely downward. Shells of the openly coiled stage exhibit longer phragmocone chambers, while whorl height slightly decreases. Apertures of fully grown specimens are constricted, with deepened ocular sinuses, suggesting well- developed eyes. Similarly, the deep hyponomic sinus suggests a well-developed hyponome. A premature part of the shell, either loosely coiled or
straight, is known in coiled Tarphycerida (Furnish and Glenis- ter, 1964), Nautilida (Hyatt, 1894; Turek, 1975), and Oncocer- ida (Manda and Turek, 2011). A similar shell shape is unknown in post-Triassic nautilids, probably due to increasing
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220