search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Grun et al.—Drilling Predation on Miocene Echinocyamus from Malta


635


or omission surface. Various terms have been used to designate these beds (see Bennett, 1980; Pedley et al., 1978, 1985; Föllmi et al., 2008) as well as the preceding hardground surface (Gruszczyński et al., 2008). The top of the MGLM shows distinct relief, with a


Figure 3. Field photograph of the Qolla I-Bajda hill near Xwejni, seen from the west. Boundaries of lithostratigraphic units are indicated by white bars, as is the sampling area (hatched in inset). Inset shows the exact position of the site in relation to the surrounding area.


Limestone members (MGLM and UGLM, respectively) are exposed in the Qolla I-Bajda section (36°4'47''N, 14°14'59''E) at Xwejni Bay. This section is directly exposed to the open sea and thus subject to intense weathering. The uppermost few mil- limeters of the otherwise very durableGlobigerina Limestone are relatively soft, presumably due to the constant cycle of seawater soaking and drying. The more resistant parts of the succession of Qolla I-Bajda, namely the terminal hardground of the Middle Globigerina Limestone and associated phosphate conglomerate (UpperMain PhosphateBed –UMPB), formledges onwhich the weathered material accumulates.


Lithostratigraphy and sedimentary environment.—Deposition in the western margin of the Malta-Ragusa Rise represents a major province of Miocene phosphogenesis with a complex origin, transport, and sedimentation of the phosphatized clasts (Pedley and Bennett, 1985). The occurrence of large amounts of phosphatized components is generally attributed to marine settings with high organic productivity, low oxygen levels, low sedimentation rates, and low terrigenous input (e.g., Föllmi et al., 2008; Tapanila et al., 2008). Following Pedley and Bennett (1985), the phosphatized clasts were deposited during periods of turbulence, interrupted by nondeposition resulting in the formation of hardgrounds as well as the deposition of normal pelagic marine sediments. Rehfeld and Janssen (1995) proposed a multiphased development of beds rich in phosphate controlled by sea-level oscillations. The studied beds follow a prominent horizon in the upper


part of the Globigerina Limestone Formation (GLF), which ranges from Aquitanian to Langhian in age. The GLF is predominantly composed of pelagic carbonate limestones deposited offshore. It is subdivided into three members—Lower (LGLM), Middle (MGLM), and Upper Globigerina Limestone (UGLM) members—on the basis of two prominent horizons that can be followed throughout the Maltese Archipelago. The second horizon separates the pale-gray marly limestones of the MGLMfrom yellowish marly limestones of theUGLM(Pedley, 1992; Föllmi et al., 2008). The basal sediments of the UGLM consist of an ~1m thick


bed containing phosphatic nodules and clasts, phosphatized fossils, and nonphosphatized components within a marly limestone matrix (Pedley and Bennett, 1985; Föllmi et al., 2008). The sediments overlie an intensely borrowed hardground


topographic seafloor high in NW and W Gozo (Pedley et al., 2002), where it ends with a distinct terminal hardground with a thalassinoidean burrow system extending up to 1.5m into the MGLM. In that area, bed thickness of theUMPB is greatest and clast size is largest (Bianucci et al., 2011). The phosphorite intraclasts and a matrix of planktonic foraminiferal packstones of the overlying UGLM infill this hardground. According to Bianucci et al. (2011), the areas where the UMPB is associated with an underlying hardground represent autochtho- nous phosphatization associated with topographic seafloor highs.


Toward the south and east, clast size and bed thickness decrease. The UMPB Bed is composed of two horizons of


phosphorite intraclasts floating in the matrix at Malta and up to five similar horizons at Gozo (Pedley and Bennett, 1985; Carbone et al., 1987; Rose et al., 1992). For these occurrences, an allochthonous origin and clast transportation over short distances, presumably from a topographic high inNWGozo, are assumed.


Different interpretations for the depositional depth esti-


mates assigned to the UMPB can be found in the literature; Carbone et al. (1987) estimated depositional depths at 25–65 m, while Bennett (1980) considered the environment to range from deep shelf margin to open shelf sea (see Boggild and Rose, 1984). According to Challis (1980), theUMPB was deposited at shallower conditions than the MGLM, which is currently thought to have been deposited at depths in excess of 400m on the basis of the absence of planktonic foraminifera and presence of chert nodules (see Bianucci et al., 2011). More agreement exists for the paleoenvironment of the UGLM, which is consistently attributed to an upper bathyal setting at 500–600m (Bellanca et al., 2002; Abels et al., 2005) or 500–800m depth (Bianucci et al., 2011). The fauna of the UMPB has been intensively studied and


includes both phosphatized and nonphosphatized components. The former comprises vertebrate bones, mollusks including pteropods and cephalopods, corals, serpulids, barnacles, terebratulid brachiopods, bored pebbles, and echinoderms. Nonphosphatized biogenic components include bivalves, barnacles, and echinoids (Pedley and Bennett, 1985). Phospha- tized skeletons can be well preserved including thin-shelled pteropods, which are preserved as phosphatic internal molds (Rehfeld and Janssen, 1995; Janssen, 2012).


Biostratigraphy.—The terminal hardground of the MGLM is associated with a hiatus of unknown duration, and hence dates given for the UMPB in the literature vary from late Burdigalian to Langhian. The history of chronostratigraphic position of the UGLM is discussed in detail in Bianucci et al. (2011) and Foresi et al. (2011). The base of the UGLMhas been traditionally assigned to the Langhian on the basis of calcareous nannoplankton and planktonic foraminiferans (nannozone CN4, NN5;Giannelli and Salvatorini, 1972; Mazzei, 1985). Föllmi et al. (2008, fig. 11) place the UMPB at the Burdigalian/Langhian


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284  |  Page 285  |  Page 286  |  Page 287  |  Page 288