search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Allaire et al.—Early Ordovician eocrinoids from Morocco


Animal Life’), coupled with cladistic and morphometric ana- lyses, made it possible to reassess the morphological variability and thus to propose a critical revision of this genus. Rhopalo- cystis now appears to be composed of only five morphological species: R. destombesi, R. fraga, R. grandis, R. havliceki, and R. zagoraensis. Considering the systematic revisions proposed here,


R. dehirensis, R. lehmani, and the three species left in open nomenclature (R. sp. A, R. sp. B, and R. sp. C) should be now considered as invalid. The specimens originally identified as R. dehirensis (Chauvel and Régnault, 1986) are attributed to R. destombesi; those identified as R. lehmani (Chauvel and Régnault, 1986) are assigned to R. zagoraensis. The specimens corresponding to R. sp. A and R. sp. B (Chauvel, 1971, 1978) are assigned to R. fraga,and R. sp. C (Chauvel, 1978) is now identified as R. havliceki. The polymorphismof some species, the presence of growth allometry, and more generally the very large morphological disparity characterizing the genus Rhopalocystis probably explain the previously overestimated intrageneric specificrichness.


Acknowledgments


This study was part of the project RALI (Rise of Animal Life), funded by theANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche, France; grant number ANR-11-BS56-0025), and part of the CNRS- CNRST cooperation program VALORIZ (grant number 52943). The authors are particularly thankful to M. Nohejlová (Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic), B. Deline (University of West Georgia, Carrollton, United States), and I.A. Rahman (University of Oxford, Oxford, England) for reviewing the manuscript and making many helpful remarks. The authors are also grateful to D. Berthet (Musée des Confluences, Lyon, France), K. El Hariri (Université Cadi Ayyad, Marrakesh, Morocco), F.J. Lindemann and H.A. Nakrem (Natural History Museum, Oslo, Norway), J. Plaine (Institut de Géologie, Rennes, France), A. Prieur and E. Robert (Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France), and S. Régnault (Muséum d’Histoire naturelle, Nantes, France) for providing access to specimens and/or latex casts of specimens housed in their collections. Precious field assistance was provided by A. Bachnou and A. Hafid (Marrakesh), B. Pittet and H. Hormière (Villeurbanne), M. Masrour (Agadir), F. Noailles (Bristol), H. Nowak and T. Vandenbroucke (Villeneuve d’Ascq), R. and V. Reboul (Saint-Chinian), M. Vidal (Brest), and D. Vizcaïno (Carcassonne). The authors also thank mad meg, the artist who made the beautiful illustration of Rhopalocystis destombesi (Fig. 2.5).


References


Akaike, H., 1974, A new look at the statistical model identification: IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, v. 19, no. 6, p. 716–723.


Allaire, N., Lefebvre, B., Martin, E., Nardin, E., and Vaucher, R., 2015, Taph- onomy of new Rhopalocystis assemblages in the Lower Ordovician of the Zagora area (central Anti-Atlas, Morocco), in Zamora, S., and Rabano, I., eds., Progress in Echinoderm Palaeobiology: Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, v. 19, p. 21–26.


Ausich, W.I., Rhenberg, E.C., Kammer, T.W., and Deline, B., 2013, Rooting the early crinoid diversification with the eocrinoid Rhopalocystis: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 45, no. 7, p. 109.


713


Ausich, W.I., Kammer, T.W., Rhenberg, E.C., and Wright, D.F., 2015, Early phylogeny of crinoids within the pelmatozoan clade: Palaeontology, v. 58, no. 6, p. 937–952.


Barrande, J., 1887, Système Silurien du Centre de la Bohême: Volume VII. Classe des Echinodermes, Ordre des Cystidées: Prague, Rivnac, 233 p.


Broadhead, T.W., 1982, Reappraisal of class Eocrinoidea (Echinodermata), in Lawrence, J.M., ed., Echinoderms, Proceedings of the International Conference, Tampa Bay: Rotterdam, Balkema, pp. 125–131.


Chauvel, J., 1941, Recherche sur les cystoïdes et les carpoïdes armoricains: Mémoires de la Société géologique et minéralogique de Bretagne, v. 5, p. 1–286.


Chauvel, J., 1971, Rhopalocystis Ubaghs: un échinoderme éocrinoïde du Trémadocien de l’Anti-Atlas marocain: Mémoires du Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, v. 73, p. 43–49.


Chauvel, J., 1978, Compléments sur les échinodermes du Paléozoïque marocain (diploporites, éocrinoïdes, édrioastéroïdés): Notes et Mémoires du Service géologique du Maroc, v. 272, p. 27–78.


Chauvel, J., and Régnault, S., 1986, Variabilité du genre Rhopalocystis Ubaghs, éocrinoïde du Trémadocien de l’Anti-Atlas marocain: Geobios, v. 19, p. 863–870.


Clausen, S., 2004, New early Cambrian eocrinoids from the Iberian Chains (NE Spain) and their role in nonreefal benthic communities: Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, v. 97, no. 3, p. 371–379.


Clavel, J., Merceron, G., and Escarguel, G., 2014, Missing data estimation in morphometrics: How much is too much?: Systematic Biology, v. 63, no. 2, p. 203–218.


Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., and Rubin, D.B., 1977, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (methodological), v. 39, no. 1, p. 1–38.


Destombes, J., 1962, Stratigraphie et paléogéographie de l’Ordovicien de l’Anti-Atlas (Maroc): un essai de synthèse: Bulletin de la Société géo- logique de France, v. 4, p. 453–460.


Destombes, J., 1971, L’Ordovicien au Maroc. Essai de synthèse stratigraphique: Mémoire du Bureau de Recherche Géologique Minière, v. 73, p. 237–263.


Destombes, J., 2006, Carte géologique au 200 000° de l’Anti-Atlas marocain. Paléozoïque inférieur: Cambrien moyen et supérieur - Ordovicien - base du Silurien. Sommaire général sur les mémoires explicatifs des cartes géo- logiques au 1/200 000 de l’Anti-Atlas marocain: Notes et Mémoires du Service géologique du Maroc, v. 515, p. 1–150.


Destombes, J., Hollard, H., and Willefert, S., 1985, Lower Palaeozoic rocks of Morocco, in Holland, C.H., ed., Lower Palaeozoic Rocks of the World. 4. Lower Palaeozoic of North Western - Central Africa: New York, Wiley, p. 91–336.


Felsenstein, J., 2005, PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6: Distributed by the author, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.


Frest, T.J, 2005, Ampheristocystis, a Silurian (lower Wenlock) eocrinoid (Echinodermata, Blastozoa) from Indiana: Geological Journal, v. 40, no. 3, p. 301–329.


Guensburg, T.E., and Sprinkle, J., 2007, Phylogenetic implications of the Protocrinoida: Blastozoans are not ancestral to crinoids: Annales de Paléontologie, v. 93, no. 4, p. 277–290.


Guensburg, T.E, Blake, D.B., Sprinkle, J., and Mooi, R., 2016, Crinoid ancestry without blastozoans: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 61, no. 2, p. 253–256.


Gutiérrez-Marco, J.C., and Martin, E., 2016, Biostratigraphy and palaeo- geography of Lower Ordovician graptolites from the Fezouata Shale (Moroccan Anti-Atlas): Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeo- ecology, v. 460, p. 35–49.


Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., and Ryan, P.D., 2001, PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis: Palaeontologia Electronica, v. 4, no. 1, 9 p.


Honaker, J., King, G., and Blackwell, M., 2011, Amelia II: A program for missing data: Journal of statistical software, v. 45, no. 7, p. 1–47.


Jaekel, O., 1918, Phylogenie und System der Pelmatozoen: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 3, p. 1–128.


Kammer, T.W., Sumrall, C.D., Zamora, S., Ausich, W.I., and Deline, B., 2013, Oral region homologies in Paleozoic crinoids and other plesiomorphic pentaradial echinoderms: PLoS One, v. 8, no. 11, e77989, p. 1–16.


Lefebvre, B., Sumrall, C.D., Shroat-Lewis, R.A., Reich, M., Webster, G.D., Hunter, A.W., Nardin, E., Rozhnov, S.V., Guensburg, T.E., Touzeau, A., Noailles, F., and Sprinkle, J., 2013, Palaeobiogeography of Ordovician echinoderms, in Harper, D.A.T, and Servais, T., eds., Early Palaeozoic Biogeography and Palaeogeography: Geological Society, London, Memoirs, v. 38, p. 173–198.


Lefebvre, B., El Hariri, K., Lerosey-Aubril, R., Servais, T., and Van Roy, P., 2016a, The Fezouata Shale (Lower Ordovician, Anti-Atlas, Morocco): A historical review: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 460, p. 7–23.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284  |  Page 285  |  Page 286  |  Page 287  |  Page 288