Sumrall—Echinoderm homology Oral-plate-/abradial-floor-plate-bearing taxa
Glyptocystitoid rhombiferans as a model.—A common expres- sion of the UEH model is found in glyptocystitoid rhombiferans and forms the archetype for oral-plate-bearing taxa (Fig. 1.1). In glyptocystitoids, seven oral plates are positioned interradially around the peristome with O1, O6, and O7 lying in the CD interray and O2–O5 positioned around the peristomial opening clockwise from O1. The 2-1-2 ambulacral symmetry of Sprinkle (1973) iswell developedwith the shared ambulacra positioned on the O4/O6 and O3/O1 sutures (Fig. 3.1). This results in O2 and O5 being precluded from the peristomial opening by these sutures. The PPCPs are small and separated, with plates 1, 3, and 4 marking the insertion point of the A ambulacrum (when present) and plates 2 and 5 marking the bifurcation points of the lateral B, C, D, and E ambulacra (Fig. 1.1). Double biserial abradial floor plates extend from the oral plates beginning on the left (Fig. 2.10). The ambulacral grooves are covered by undifferentiated cover plates.
Remarks.—The oral system of glyptocystitoids is straightforward. The floor plates are interpreted as the abradial floor plate series because they are broadly exposed along the margins of the ambulacral system and bear brachiole facets along the primary/ secondary sutures of the floor plate bodies. Similar morphologies are seen in the other derived blastozoans and can be interpreted as variations on this theme and easily reconciled with the glyptocystitoid model (Fig. 3). Following are discussions of variation in expression of the oral plate and floor plate systems seen throughout this large echinoderm clade. There is considerable variation among derived blastozoans
with respect to the fate of the lateral oral plates O2 and O5. Some taxa, such as Rhopalocystis, show a simplification of the 2-1-2 symmetry by bearing shorter shared ambulacra (Sumrall and Wray, 2007; Kammer et al., 2013) (Fig. 2.12, 2.13). Such taxa do not bear sutures between O4/O6 and O3/O1 that preclude the lateral oral plates from the peristomial border as in Kammer et al.’s (2013) peristomial border A2. Instead, they have O2 and O5 contact with the peristomial border forming Kammer et al.’s (2013) peristomial border A3. This type of shared ambulacral reduction (pseudo-five-fold symmetry of Sumrall and Wray, 2007) is common in derived stemmed echinoderms, and variations are seen in coronates (Fig. 3.7), blastoids (Fig. 3.8), plesiomorphic crinoids (Fig. 3.9), and several of the diploporitan clades (Figs. 2.11, 3.11).
Blastoids and coronates.—The oral plate systems of blastoids (Fig. 3.8) and coronates (Fig. 3.7) are similar owing to their close phylogenetic relationship (Brett et al., 1983; Donovan and Paul, 1985). In these taxa, oral plates are the deltoids whose adjacent sutures form the proximal-most food grooves (Sumrall and Waters, 2012). In many blastoids, the orals bear large del- toid bodies that extend distally down the theca, becoming important constructional elements of the thecal wall. The ambulacra share the peristome more or less evenly, and conse- quently, these taxa show almost no hint of 2-1-2 symmetry except in the configuration of the primary peristomial cover plates (Fig. 3.7) and a slightly wider than high peristomial
609
opening in most blastoids (Fig. 3.8). The CD interray bears two dominate plates, likely O1 and O7, and in blastoids may include accessory plates (cryptodeltoids, etc.). These plates show a variety of relationships to the periproct and spiracles (exit pores of the respiratory system in many blastoid groups), forming the basis for present classifications of blastoids (but see Bauer et al., 2017).
Hemicosmitoids.—In the hemicosmitoid Hemicosmites, the oral area is greatly simplified by paedomorphic ambulacral reduction to include only the A, shared BC, and shared DE ambulacra (Sumrall and Wray, 2007; Sumrall, 2008). The lateral oral plates O2 and O5 do not develop in this taxon, associated with the failure of the shared ambulacra to bifurcate (Fig. 3.6). Enlarged oral plates O7, O3, and O4 occupy the interradial areas of the remaining three ambulacra. Plates O1 and O6 (wedge plates of Bockelie, 1979, in part) are extremely small and lie between O7 and the oral area (Fig. 3.6). The first left brachiole facets lie on the sutures between the first secondary floor plates (wedge plates of Bockelie, 1979, in part) and the remaining oral plates (Sumrall, 2008). Paired, likely fused, floor plates positioned between the oral plates form facets for erect, brachiole-bearing ambulacra of the distal ambulacra (Sprinkle, 1975) (see the following).
Diploporitans.—The diploporitan Protocrinites (Fig. 3.3) shows an oral plate arrangement that is consistent with the glyptocystitoid model. Seven interradial oral plates are present, with O2 and O5 being precluded from the peristome by the BC and DE shared ambulacral grooves. As the result, only O1, O3, O4, and O6 form the peristomial opening. The hydropore and gonopore are positioned in the CD oral plate complex. Some diploporitan clades, such as Glyptosphaerites and
Eucystis,show a 36º clockwise rotation of the oral plates with respect to the ambulacra (Fig. 3.5). Here, the main food grooves lie atop the oral plates (repeatedly branching in Eucystis), rather than along the adjacent sutures, and extend distally irregularly down the theca. The oral plates are diagnosable despite their radial position because they retain the plesiomorphic seven-plate oral configuration condition (Fig. 3.5). Plates O1, O6, and O7 are positioned in the CD interradius as evidenced by 2-1-2 ambulacral symmetry, the primary peristomial cover plate configuration, and the positions of the hydropore, gonopore, and periproct (Fig. 3.5). The PPCPs, however, retain the plesiomorphic interradial position. Holocystitid diploporitans are modified from the plesio-
morphic condition by the addition of a differentiated, open facetal circlet positioned distally to the oral circlet (Fig. 3.11). This has led to considerable confusion of homology in the clade, but all taxa seem to retain the plesiomorphic seven oral plate condition (see Sheffield and Sumrall, 2015; 2017). Generally, extremely short food grooves extend along oral plate sutures epithecally to large appendage facets mounted on differentiated thecal plates (facetals). Here, the oral plates tend to be rather small, and food grooves are confined to their sutures or adjacent plate surfaces. This same pattern is seen in nearly all taxa, but the facetal count may be reduced in Pustulocystis and there may be additional oral plates in Brightonicystis (Paul 1971;
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238 |
Page 239 |
Page 240 |
Page 241 |
Page 242 |
Page 243 |
Page 244 |
Page 245 |
Page 246 |
Page 247 |
Page 248 |
Page 249 |
Page 250 |
Page 251 |
Page 252 |
Page 253 |
Page 254 |
Page 255 |
Page 256 |
Page 257 |
Page 258 |
Page 259 |
Page 260 |
Page 261 |
Page 262 |
Page 263 |
Page 264 |
Page 265 |
Page 266 |
Page 267 |
Page 268 |
Page 269 |
Page 270 |
Page 271 |
Page 272 |
Page 273 |
Page 274 |
Page 275 |
Page 276 |
Page 277 |
Page 278 |
Page 279 |
Page 280 |
Page 281 |
Page 282 |
Page 283 |
Page 284 |
Page 285 |
Page 286 |
Page 287 |
Page 288