search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
596


Journal of Paleontology 91(4):582–603


show that having a facet confined to a single plate does not indicate the appendages that arose from the facet were uniserial. Equally, the coronate genera Stephanocrinus Conrad, 1842 and Cupulocorona Donovan and Paul, 1985 are known to have had isotomously branched erect biserial arms (Fay, 1962; Brett et al., 1983), but the first plate of each ambulacrum is uniserial and analogous to a crinoid axilliary plate (Donovan and Paul, 1985, p. 528). Thus, it seems that biserial brachioles can arise from one or a pair of flooring plates in ‘cystoids.’ Erect biserial arms are known in the eocrinoids Trachelo-


ambulacra and recumbent brachioles (Sprinkle, 1982b, p. 290, fig. 72i). Rhopalocystis and Bromidocystis alone are enough to


crinus Sprinkle, 1973 and Bockia Bockelie, 1981b. Trachelo- crinus is unique in having lateral brachioles that branch off every third trunk plate (Sprinkle, 1973, p. 125). Bockia has essentially the same structure as Rhopalocystis only with erect arms. Biserial brachioles arise alternately along the biserial main ambulacral trunk (Bockelie, 1981b, p. 129, fig. 2g, j). Both Bockia and Trachelocrinus have erect arms arising from an oral prominence, which Bockelie (1981b, fig. 3a, b) thought was composed of seven peri-orals in Bockia. Undoubted uniserial ambulacra (main trunk and pinnules)


occur in paracrinoids and may be erect (e.g., Comarocystites, see Parsley and Mintz, 1975, pl. 1, figs. 2, 3) or recumbent (e.g., Sinclairocystis, see Parsley, 1982b). Most paracrinoids have recumbent ambulacra in which the pinnules arise exclusively on one side of the ambulacrum, usually the left side, but the right in the unusual paracrinoid Bistomiacystis (Sprinkle and Parsley, 1982). Most commonly, paracrinoids have just two recumbent ambulacra, but sometimes one or the other branches. Both ambulacra are curved clockwise in Canadocystis, giving an S-shaped pattern (see Parsley and Mintz, 1975, pl. 10, fig. 9, pl. 11, figs. 14, 15). Clockwise ambulacra have their left sides on the outside of the curve, and ambulacral facets are confined to the outside of the curve. Thus, Bistomiacystis has two pairs of ambulacra curved in a counterclockwise manner (Sprinkle and Parsley, 1982, p. 225, fig. 60), and this probably explains why it


ambulacra of Achradocystites resemble those of the North American genus Comarocystites, but both North American genera have uniserial ambulacra bearing pinnules on one side only. Thus, it seems unlikely that either Heckerites or Achradocystites has close affinities with the North American paracrinoids. Diploporite ‘cystoids’ include yet other ambulacral struc-


tures that pose problems in recognizing homologies. First, sphaeronitid diploporites have radial circum-orals, rather than the interradial peri-orals of most other ‘cystoids.’ In many genera, the entire ambulacra are confined to these radial circum- orals and consist of one or more epithecal food grooves, which end in small (about 1mm or less) facets. The appendages that arose from them remain entirely unknown. Two significant variations in this basic pattern occur. First, in four sphaeronitid genera, Codiacystis Jaekel, 1899, Tholocystis Chauvel, 1941, Herpetocystis Termier and Termier, 1972, and Finitiporus Frest and Strimple (in Frest et al., 2011), two narrow food grooves leave the edges of the mouth and branch in opposite directions to form a palisade of ambulacral facets surrounding the mouth (see Frest et al., 2011, p. 32, fig. 19). Frest and Strimple described such ambulacra as ‘epipanniculate’ and assigned them to a new subfamily, Herpetocystinae (Frest et al., 2011, p. 59, table 19, p. 62), although Termier and Termier (1972) had previously erected a family Herpetocystidae. Second, in some species of Eucystis Angelin, 1878 and all


species of Glyptosphaerites Müller, 1854, some food grooves extend over the theca to plates beyond the circum-oral circlet. The arrangement of these longer food grooves was apparently


has its facets confined to the right side of each ambulacrum. The flattened eocrinoid Haimacystis Sumrall et al., 2001, has only two ambulacra curved in a rough semicircle, apparently com- posed of biserial trunk plates possibly with biserial brachioles arising from the outer edge of the curved ambulacra (Sumrall et al., 2001, p. 988, fig. 2.2, p. 990, fig. 4.3). Thus, one ambu- lacrum has brachioles exclusively to the left side and the other exclusively to the right. An oddity of paracrinoid ambulacra is that in some taxa, the first pinnule on each ambulacrum is dis- proportionately large (see, for example, Parsley and Mintz, 1975, pl. 3, fig. 5, pl. 7, figs. 14, 15). Finally, Malocystites murchisoni Billings, 1858, is unique among paracrinoids in having recumbent pinnules (Parsley and Mintz, 1975, p. 86). Rozhnov (2012, 2015) has recently summarized available


information on two possible paracrinoid genera from the Baltic region. Heckerites Rozhnov, 1987 has two recumbent biserial ambulacra, which are said to form part of the thecal wall, with biserial brachioles arising from only some of the flooring plates (Rozhnov, 2012, p. 310, 311, fig. 3). Similarly, Achradocystites has erect biserial arms with alternating biserial brachioles. Superficially, Heckerites resembles the North American para- crinoid Amygdalocystites Billings, 1854, and the erect


random, especially in Glyptosphaerites. Regnéll (1945, pl. 9, fig. 5) illustrated a specimen with two parallel ambulacral branches that produce two facets each on three plates. Similarly, Kesling (1968a, p. S235, fig. 135, 1a, 1b) illustrated ambulacra in which some thecal plates bear two ambulacral facets, whereas others bear the food groove but no facets. Apparently, the thecal plates existed before the ambulacral grooves extended over them and developed facets. If so, thecal plates bearing parts of the food grooves and facets cannot be considered to be ‘ambu- lacral plates’ or even part of the axial skeleton. Furthermore, the ambulacral grooves bear no trace of any cover plates. Other diploporites, such as Protocrinites Eichwald, 1840


and Dactylocystis Jaekel, 1899, have a thecal structure with a regular arrangement of ambulacral plates. In Protocrinites, the food grooves extend down the theca and give rise to lateral branches alternately, which end in a single facet confined to a single thecal plate (Bockelie, 1984, p. 28, fig. 16). Thus, the ambulacra appear to be composed of regularly arranged biserial thecal plates. Bockelie (1984, fig. 16) even showed that there was a growth zone where thecal plates were added above the


basal two circlets of plates, which coincided with the tips of the five ambulacra. The facets give rise to erect biserial brachioles despite being confined to a single thecal plate. Both main ambulacral grooves and brachioles are furnished with cover plates. Dactylocystis shows an even more regular arrangement in which narrow ambulacra are composed of regularly alter- nating plates that bear a single facet and all the diplopores. No interradial plates bear pores (Kesling, 1968a, fig. 146, 4a, b). The Gomphocystitidae bear spiral ambulacra that coil in a clockwise manner so appendages arise from the left side only.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284  |  Page 285  |  Page 286  |  Page 287  |  Page 288