786
Journal of Paleontology 91(4):781–798
proximal edge; large, prominent spine articulations not sunken into depressions and bearing conical, pointed arm spines exceeding the length of an arm segment.
Occurrence.—Coln Quarry, Lechlade, Gloucestershire, UK 51.6951ºN, 1.7372ºW; ex situ layer of fissile gray shaley clay from the jason Zone, Peterborough Member, lower Oxford Clay, Callovian, late Middle Jurassic.
Description of holotype.—EE 16205 (Fig. 3) is an articulated disk (4.58mm disk diameter) exposing both dorsal and ventral sides and with proximal segments of one arm preserved; ventral side covered by an arm fragment comprising eight median to distal segments and belonging to the holotype or to another specimen of the same species; dorsal side of the disk covered in its central part by few small, round, imbricate and moderately thick scales and a slightly larger circular central primary plate; remaining dorsal side of the disk covered by large, rounded isosceles-triangular radial shields (Fig. 3.2) accounting for approximately two-thirds of the disk radius joined in pairs over their entire length and separated interradially by a single plate similar in shape to the radial shields but slightly narrower; no removable granules or spines or conspicuous stereom orna- mentation discernible on the dorsal disk plates and scales. Ventral side of disk with relatively few interradial scales
similar in shape and size to the dorsal disk scales, devoid of removable granules or spines. Genital slit extending over at least half of the disk radius; no genital papillae discernible; abradial genital plate (Fig. 3.4) length approximately four times width, with longitudinal ridge but devoid of perforation on exposed side. Oral shield (Fig. 3.3) arrow-shaped, with pointed, acute proximal angle, concave lateral edges, and rounded rectangular distal portion; adoral shields (Fig. 3.3) comparatively broad, with wide distal portion encompassing almost half of the second oral tentacle opening; proximal tips of adoral shields meeting in front of oral shield; second oral tentacle pore (Fig. 3.3) opening inside mouth slit; oral plates stout and wide; first ventral arm plate radially compressed pentagonal, wider than long, with obtuse distal angle, pointed lateral angles, and rounded rectangular proximal edge; lateral oral papillae (Fig. 3.3) fully separated but contiguous, rounded rectangular except for pointed distal-most papilla, second distal-most papilla largest, remaining papillae continuously decreasing in size toward the dental plate; single, short, conical apical oral papilla, slightly smaller than neighboring lateral oral papillae; teeth not exposed. Only proximal arm segments preserved (note that the
median to distal arm portion covering the ventral side of the holotype is ignored here as it might well belong to another individual), segments nearly as long as wide; LAPs with weak constriction and coarsely meshed outer stereom with slightly enlarged trabecular intersections; spine articulations on elevated part of distal LAP portion, at some distance from the distal edge of the plate; spine articulations (Fig. 3.7) relatively large, evenly distributed over the entire distal portion of the LAP, with a dorsalward increase in size of the spine articulations and in the distance separating them; dorsal-most spine articulation visible in dorsal view; spine articulation composed of a large round muscle opening proximally bordered by a thin, irregularly denticulate vertical ridge and distally encompassed by a wider,
more strongly protruding, smooth, semicircular and oblique vertical ridge; nerve opening slightly smaller than muscle opening, distally bordering the semicircular ridge; arm spines (Fig. 3.6) conical, pointed, with rough longitudinally reticulate outer surface, slightly longer than one arm segment; ventral edge of lateral arm plates with deep tentacle notch, distally encompassed by a thinned ventro-distal edge of the lateral arm plate. Ventral arm plates (Fig. 3.5) widest distally, with straight distal edge, deeply concave latero-proximal edges, and pointed proximal tip, separated by lateral arm plates on all exposed segments; tentacle openings large, covered by two oval, nearly equal-sized tentacle scales, developed as between-plate open- ings in all preserved arm segments. Dorsal arm plates (Fig. 3.6) small, fan-shaped, with right proximal angle and convex distal edge, widely separated by lateral arm plates.
Paratype supplements.—EE 16206 (Fig. 4.1) is an articulated disk (4.63mm disk diameter) exposing both ventral and dorsal sides; ventral disk morphology well in agreement with that of holotype; dorsal disk plating better preserved than in holotype, with clearly radial shield pairs abutting over their entire length interradially separated by a single plate similar in size and shape to radial shields. EE 16207 (Fig. 4.2) is an articulated armfragment composed
of seven proximal to median segments; proximal segments similar to those of holotype; median arm segments becoming progressively more elongate; median LAPs without constriction and with smaller and less prominent spine articulations; arm spines of median segments as long as half an arm segment; tentacle pores large and developed as between-plate openings in two proximal-most segments; tentacle pores of the following segments developed as within-plate perforations, strongly decreasing in size and progressively moving from a ventral to a ventro-distal position toward the distal-most preserved segment; proximal-most within-plate tentacle perforation with two oval scales; following tentacle openings with no discernible scales; ventral armplates strongly decreasing in size fromproximal-most to distal-most preserved segment; the two proximal-most ones similar to those observed on holotype, the following ventral arm plates fan-shaped, wider than long. EE 16208 (Fig. 4.3) is an articulated arm fragment
composed of nine proximal to median arm segments; proximal ones similar to those of holotype, median ones more elongate; median LAPs devoid of constriction but with similar outer surface ornamentation as proximal lateral arm plates; dorsal- most spine articulations decreasing in size and moving from a nearly dorsal to a lateral position from the proximal-most to the distal-most preserved segments; arm spines of median segments equaling half the length of an arm segment; dorsal arm plates discernible on all preserved arm segments. EE 16209 (Fig. 4.4), EE 16210 (Fig. 4.5), and EE 16211
(Fig 4.6) are dissociated proximal, median, and distal LAPs, respectively; rounded rectangular outline; proximal LAP nearly as long as high, distal one approximately 1.5 times wider than high; dorsal edge weakly concave, distal edge straight to very weakly convex; proximal edge deeply concave, devoid of discernible spurs but paralleled by deep, poorly defined furrow; weak horizontal striation near central part of furrow; outer surface ornamentation as in LAPs of holotype; four spine
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238 |
Page 239 |
Page 240 |
Page 241 |
Page 242 |
Page 243 |
Page 244 |
Page 245 |
Page 246 |
Page 247 |
Page 248 |
Page 249 |
Page 250 |
Page 251 |
Page 252 |
Page 253 |
Page 254 |
Page 255 |
Page 256 |
Page 257 |
Page 258 |
Page 259 |
Page 260 |
Page 261 |
Page 262 |
Page 263 |
Page 264 |
Page 265 |
Page 266 |
Page 267 |
Page 268 |
Page 269 |
Page 270 |
Page 271 |
Page 272 |
Page 273 |
Page 274 |
Page 275 |
Page 276 |
Page 277 |
Page 278 |
Page 279 |
Page 280 |
Page 281 |
Page 282 |
Page 283 |
Page 284 |
Page 285 |
Page 286 |
Page 287 |
Page 288