TECH TALK
Tech TALK
In this article, Tony Anderson of the CSA details a simple tool that provides clarity to all manner of commissioning projects.
F
or those who have never used one, and those who are unfamiliar with a ‘project specific’ commissioning plan, it can be initially difficult to gauge how beneficial having such a plan in place would be to the testing and commissioning of any project.
On the other hand, if you have worked on projects that had a detailed commissioning plan in place, you will undoubtedly know and understand their importance.
So what is a commissioning plan? According to BSRIA’s BG8/2009 “Model Commissioning Plan” in its simplest form it should: ■ Provide general information about the project ■ Identify the commissioning team members during each stage of the commissioning process
■ Define the roles and responsibilities for each commissioning team member
■ Create a schedule of commissioning activities for each stage of the commissioning process
■ Establish documentation requirements associated with the commissioning process
■ Establish communication and reporting procedures for the commissioning process.
Reflecting on projects that I have been involved with across the UK and overseas, the most
22 June 2017
successful have benefited from having an accurate and updated commissioning plan. The commissioning phase of any project is normally the most difficult by its very nature. Systems only near completion towards the end of construction phase and the commissioning phase of a project is generally shoe-horned into a few weeks/months preceding project practical completion or handover.
Testing and commissioning at the latter part of a project is a necessity to allow systems to be tested with the building envelope in a final, or at least advanced, state of completion. This is also when construction teams are eager to get everyone out of zones/floors to close out areas and zones and this is when I have found that the commissioning plan can make a massive difference.
The installation team managers at this stage know what the main systems are – as opposed to floor area only – and what is required from them to allow completion of each building service. Construction teams know what commissioning activities are taking place. For example, they can understand why ‘commissioning tiles’ are not installed for duration of commissioning – reminding them of the cost of replacing ceiling tiles or downtime of removing commissioning access tiles usually helps.
The commissioning teams know what systems
are to be commissioned, method statements are approved. They know who to report progress to and how to finalize system paperwork to allow systems to be fully witnessed.
Managers are aware of the process of what systems are being commissioned, where commissioning documentation is being kept and when system will be available for witnessing.
Projects without a Commissioning Plan I found that the common thread on projects that didn’t have a plan in place was that minor building completion issues lead quickly to major delays in completing the commissioning process. Now how much of this was down to not having a commissioning plan in place is difficult to assess, however, the outcome was the same on each project that didn’t have one!
Time and time again commissioning activities were overlooked. A common issue which on the face of it could appear trivial is the fitting out of entire floors with floor tiles and suspended ceilings to give the area ‘the finished look’. Fitting the tiles out may well help make the
www.acr-news.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120
