search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Sponsored by HUMIDIFICATION


use an external energy source. The atomisation has a cooling eff ect on the room temperature, signifi cantly reducing the need for energy. Some pressured adiabatic systems are capable of working at capacities of up to 750l/hr, which is benefi cial to environments that require large humidifi cation loads, such as offi ces, data centres, hospitals or laboratories. The most eff ective adiabatic systems off er a free cooling eff ect of up to 30 per cent, providing savings on running costs in areas where cooling is necessary. Furthermore, in specialist environments such as cleans rooms and laboratories, there can be a risk of electrostatic charging resulting from objects attracting dust as a result of dry air. Regulating air humidity eff ectively reduces potential electrostatic discharges, which are likely to dry spaces less than 35%/rh.


Powered by a 230 volt single-phase motor, these units have an impressive absorption distance of 900mm irrespective of load, modular systems and duct work. Furthermore, since adiabatic systems do not require an external source of energy to the transform the water into vapour from humidifi cation, they have lower energy demands when compared to isothermal humidifi ers.


Public safety should also be taken into consideration in the majority of applications and in particular, public sector buildings such as hospitals and laboratories. There are numerous industry guides that must be consulted to specify the most eff ective humidifi cation solution. For all building services professionals, the ‘KS19: Humidifi cation’ guide by the Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE), should be viewed as a must-read as it considers the ways to increase the humidity of air to ensure that it is maintained at the appropriate levels. For those who are particularly interested in the healthcare sector, authoritative guidance on public health and hygiene can be sought from CIBSE’s ‘TM13: Minimising the


HygroMatik’s HPS and LPS systems


H


ygroMatik’s HPS and LPS adiabatic high and low pressure nozzle


systems for air conditioning and ventilation units were designed to provide the highest level of hygiene.


Using HPS or LPS systems in conjunction with reverse osmosis will deliver demineralised water, ensuring that only the cleanest air is delivered. These combined systems off er hygienic optimum humidifi cation and a close control with an accuracy of +\-1% RH.


The adiabatic high pressure nozzle system HPS humidifi es the air in air conditioning and ventilation systems and provides very high humidifi cation performance for an extremely low energy requirement and with maximum control accuracy. Very precise stainless steel high pressure nozzles produce a very fi ne mist, which is very quickly absorbed by the air in the unit chamber.


On the other hand, The HygroMatik low pressure system LPS for adiabatic humidifi cation and exhaust air cooling in air conditioning systems is particularly easy to install, space saving, quiet and suitable for even short absorption distances. It is therefore excellently suited for the simple and fast upgrading of existing air conditioning systems.


29


Risk of Legionnaires’ Disease’, ‘Guide G for Public Health and Plumbing’ or the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers’ (ASHRAE) ‘HVAC Design Manual for Hospitals and Clinics’.


More recently the FETA Humidity Group has published a white paper, ‘Humidity and its Impact on Human Comfort and Wellbeing in Occupied Buildings’, demonstrating that buildings rely on a properly designed ventilation system


that provides an adequate supply of clean air. Installing an up-to-date HVAC system should be a prime concern for building owners and facilities managers to not only create a comfortable and compliant environment, but also lower long-standing costs from ineffi cient energy management. Altogether, the outcome will be fewer energy running costs, less sick days,and will also ensure the profi tability of commercial buildings in the future.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120