This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Country Watch


tion official, while acknowledging that the signing of this deal was an important first step, stated that the deal “won’t solve all of Yemen’s problems im- mediately.” Furthermore, the United States has ex- pressed concern over what this move might mean for the United States’ fight against terrorism. Amid the clashes of violence and chaos during the pe- riod of protest and political unrest in Yemen, some militant Islamist groups, including some sympa- thetic to al Qaeda, have gained ground in southern Yemen. The U.S. government said they had taken steps to “ensure that counterterrorism cooperation continue[d] following Saleh’s departure.” These steps have included “building relationships with a wider range of military commanders who could re- main in positions of influence after [] Saleh’s exit.”


22


For nine months, young protestors have been demonstrating almost continuously to call for Saleh’s exit and sweeping political reforms. The transition agreement does not specifically lay out any formal role for them but the government of Yemen did promise to open a dialogue with


Advance your career to the next level! Upgrade your knowledge:


Earn an LL.M. Finance in Frankfurt, Germany!


them, making certain that their demands are met. Benomar commended the protestors for generat- ing “the momentum for change,” stating “the door is now open for you to make a real difference in the transition.”


On November 23, 2011, when President Saleh an- nounced that he would be giving up his power, the young protesters were dancing in the streets but they said they had only reached a fraction of their goals. They shouted in the streets, “[o]ur revolu- tion will start today. Saleh’s fall is Step One.”


* Submitted by Mollie A. Dapolito


ECJ Rules on Application of European Union Emission Trading System to Aviation Industry


On December 21, 2011, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) decided the European Union Emis- sion Trading System (EU ETS) program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from international flights to be compatible with international law.


The ECJ upheld the preliminary decision by the EU Advocate General to dismiss a legal claim brought by airline carriers in the United States, declaring the European Union Directive 2008/101 law chal- lenging the global warning pollution from aviation to be consistent with principles of customary in- ternational law as the sovereignty of States over their airspace and the illegitimacy of claims to sovereignty over the high seas and freedom to fly over the high seas international law.


INSTITUTE FOR LAW AND FINANCE Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main


• Excellent education in law and finance


• Combine theory and practice for law, business and economics graduates


• Study in a major European as well as a global financial center • International program and students (All courses in English)


• Interesting internships in banks, law firms, financial services and regulatory bodies


Contact: Institute for Law and Finance Phone: +49 (0) 69 798-33624 Email: LLM@ilf.uni-frankfurt.de


www.ilf-frankfurt.de


Three years ago the European Parliament and Council approved a law to include carbon dioxide emissions produced by aviation in the Emission Trading Scheme (ETS). The EU Emission Trad- ing System is one of the pillars of the European Union strategy to reduce industrial greenhouse gas emissions in a cost effective manner. Working on the “cap and trade principle”, it shows that it is possible to trade in greenhouse emissions using market-based instruments Factories, power plants and other installations, receive gas emissions al-


ILSA Quarterly » volume 20 » issue 3 » February 2012


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112