This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Engineering The challenge of Far Eastern design


With 25 years as a commercial manager delivering infrastructure projects for clients across the globe, John Judge believes UK design houses are in danger of falling behind


T


he UK has been at the forefront of engineering for centuries, but the last few decades have seen a significant rise in rail design


competency from the Far East. In countries such as India, China, Malaysia and Singapore, satellite offices of European companies and home grown start-ups have gone from providing basic design requirements to delivering whole design services at appealing rates. The UK is still recognised as a centre of excellence, but it faces a severe challenge in maintaining its high standards at a competitive cost base. Like the proverbial runaway train, rising


competency in the Far East is unstoppable. But as it grows, the income expectations of practitioners have grown with it, and as a result there are positive signs that the cost differential between East and West is closing. Yet budget holders still channel rail


design work overseas. This is because they are seeking to deliver their clients value for money, and in times when funds are not so readily available it’s a desire that has never been stronger. Why not get what you want


at a cheaper price? For that reason UK rail designers need to seriously respond to the growing competency of the Far East or risk losing their place in the market.


Quicker and smarter At a simple level it relates to the unit cost of individuals. It is very economic to run smaller design projects in Far East design houses. However, experience of more complex projects points to production times being marginally longer than UK design houses. This is something UK design houses need to take advantage of and exploit in the bidding process. The day rate may be more than a Far Eastern competitor, but if the budget holder is made aware of how quickly you can produce the design, there is every chance you will be the more competitive option. Budget holders need to be mindful of the risks when taking complex design projects to multiple offices. They need to reassure themselves that the necessary controls, quality checks and change management protocols are in place to allow the design output to be delivered as planned.


Differing standards The difference in standards between design houses in other parts of the world and the UK can lead to misunderstandings in the design process and to issues concerning safety and quality control. Outside the UK, the design environment tends to be less restrictive on delivering constructability and health and safety. Therefore constructability of design under European conditions, and safe delivery of these, may be challenging if one were to use a wholly sourced Far Eastern design house.


Cultural issues may also come into


play. Junior employees, who are often the designer/engineer at the coalface, tend not to challenge senior management, and this is a silent problem in many areas of the world. If after construction something goes


wrong and design is blamed, consequences can vary greatly between Europe and the Far East. For example, one high profile case in China saw 54 officials, including Zhang Shuguang, the rail ministry’s deputy chief engineer, punished for ‘bad management’ and ‘design errors’ after 40 people died and 172 were injured when a high-speed train went into the back of a stalled train in the eastern province of Zhejiang. However, when similar incidents occur in Europe, the approach leans more to reviewing standards and change requirements than punishing individuals.


Reputation for getting things right Incidents such as the one that happened in China can raise serious doubts about the quality of Far East design houses. Can you trust the design you’ve been presented with? Do you need to check it? Do you have time to check it? And why should you - you’ve already paid enough for it? These doubts over quality are especially heightened when working with someone new who is thousands of miles away. Discovering flaws in the design during the construction stage is one of the most common causes of costly delays to projects. An expensive halt in works is something budget holders are desperate to avoid. Human error can occur, but to reduce this risk, UK design houses work to a high standard of assurance and validation in the process of design. As a result there is a degree of confidence in the integrity of their calculations. By trading on a reputation for getting things right and backing this up with proof, UK design houses can make themselves very attractive to budget holders who have little room to manoeuvre and


April 2013 Page 151


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204