Opinion alone get asked whether they agree with it.
And for those who do not yet realise that fares are subject to significant regulation, it is perhaps not surprising that many believe that above-inflation increases in season tickets mistakenly equal increases in train company profits. When asked, people say operators make margins of more than 20 per cent; in fact, Toc profits account for just three pence in every pound of income received. We all have a job to do to rectify this. Ministers could make a useful start in the fares review due in May by explaining why the long-standing goal of taxpayers paying for 25 per cent of industry costs makes sense, economically rational as it might seem to you or me. The second challenge relates to the ‘deal’. Customers’ confidence is easily undermined if they feel what they have bought comes with hidden conditions attached, or if they get the book thrown at them when they make a genuine mistake. Here again, we are making progress. Official surveys show the proportion of customers who partially or fully understand the different types of tickets increased significantly in the last three years. Operators have recently improved the arrangements for Advance ticket holders who board a service for which they have not booked. We have further developments to come, ranging from enhanced information about ticket conditions to improving awareness about how to claim in the event of delay.
If we do fall short, one reason is that we take too long to crank through these issues. We can often explain this away as the result of having to deal with a dense, arcane, pre- privatisation, pre-internet, legacy. Fair enough, but as leaders we need to put our shoulders to the wheel and push on through better to meet the needs of today’s customers.
The third challenge is all about transparency. Part of the problem is that it is difficult to know what ‘good’ in this area looks like. Rail actually has a positive story to tell. We are scrutinised heavily; we are working with the regulator to produce more information on the industry’s finances; and a large amount of data is publicly available about our industry. It would be nice to see some of the same coming through from our competitor modes like road and domestic air. The difficulty is that expectation in this field keeps growing. Not necessarily from the public themselves, or for the most well-considered of reasons; but even to question the detail of a proposal for greater transparency itself suggests the industry has something to hide.
There needs to be a way in which greater transparency can be encouraged but where the industry can raise genuine concerns without being cast as a pariah. The whole agenda is tactical and without strategic vision. Between industry, government and stakeholders, we have yet to find the sweet spot which ultimately best meets the needs of passengers and taxpayers.
The bottom line, then, is that we do much to engender trust among our customers and more widely, but we can never rest on our laurels. That may sound pat, but just think of how one British model of corporate trust has had itself to move with the times and refresh its promise of ‘never knowingly undersold’, and with success.
Did you think our business was simply to move people from A to B? If it was not already obvious, your business is the same as that of any other successful sector. It is the business of trust. Michael Roberts is chief executive of ATOC (Association of Train Operating Companies)
Join your Institute today
• Network with fellow professionals • Drive your career forward
• Explore the issues that matter to your sector
Visit us at Railtex stand J32
April 2013 Page 109
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204