Opinion
In the passenger seat
Trust me I’m a Toc
Anthony Smith says that understanding trust more, and what drives it, may become increasingly important in franchise replacement or extensions
T
rust. The most basic and probably most underestimated component of our lives. You can’t bottle it, you can’t regulate it and you can’t specify it in franchises. It can take years to build up trust in a brand and seconds to lose it.
Brands and the railway are interesting. In our research the only brand that comes across with any resonance among passengers is Virgin – the recent West Coast affair probably
journey with FCC. However, Which? gave 40 per cent overall customer satisfaction. Why the gap?
The two surveys measure different things in very different ways. The 65,000 plus passengers who take part in the NPS are recording their satisfaction with different aspects of the journey they are making or have just made. The sample is representative of current rail users including business users. The survey is designed to produce information that can drive change and action. We know from the various independent reviews we have had done that the survey is pretty accurate – to within one or two per cent. The Which? survey is drawn from a self-selected poll of its members who have used the railway in the last year. The data from the 7,500 participants is weighted afterwards using NPS data. It measures overall satisfaction and likelihood to recommend the company. It is not possible to divine from the data what caused the person to think that or what the train company might do to improve.
It is very common for people to have quite different opinions about how they are dealt with individually and about a brand or industry overall. Banking, energy and the health service probably fall into this category. However, the two rail surveys generally put the train companies in the same relative positions. So does it matter if you trust a train
reinforced this as it gave the brand much more exposure. However, most passengers seem to have a hazy idea about other brands – not surprising given you can still find British Rail signs on the Underground! Brand loyalty is also predicated on choice. Many rail passengers do not feel they have, or do not actually have, much choice. Driving brand values in a monopoly situation is difficult. Does it matter? It should matter at times of franchise replacement surely. The recent publication of Passenger Focus’s rail National Passenger Survey (NPS) and Which? magazine’s rail brand survey was interesting. Why were the scores seemingly so different? For example 81 per cent of passengers in the NPS were satisfied overall with their last
company or not? Yes, it must do. Talking to people in the industry there seems to be a general feeling that fare rises, patchy performance and media coverage drive negative overall perceptions despite individual experiences. We know from our own journeys – as reflected in the NPS – they are OK most of the time. Understanding trust more, and what drives it, may become increasingly important in franchise replacement or extensions. We are already doing more work to understand this and hope to pilot some new work with train companies. Anthony Smith is the chief executive of Passenger Focus
April 2013 Page 111
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204