This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
MANAGEMENT + SYSTEMS


Effective enterprise product cost management


The business benefits of a systematic enterprise product cost management (PCM) programme are significant, yet many manufacturers still don’t implement these initiatives effectively. Traditionally, product cost management has been performed by highly-specialist cost engineering experts. Myles Peyton, managing director of northern Europe for PCM software specialist aPriori, explains how innovative software tools are now equipping professionals across every department of a manufacturing enterprise to execute an effective PCM programme with maximum impact and cost reduction potential.


influence product costs in many different ways. Engineering teams might decide on specific designs


I


for example, but there will usually be multiple alternative approaches that would meet the same form, fit and functional requirements - each factor dictating a different cost. Likewise, sourcing teams will work to produce a design with multiple potential costs for manufacturing, negotiated with reference to materials, plant cost structures, capabilities and process controls. And then there’s the manufacturing team, which will recommend a way to produce the design and estimate a ballpark cost, even though there may be other, even more cost-effective, ways to tool and manufacture the same design.


“ Every discrete manufacturer will be well aware that ‘Cost of Goods Sold’ (COGS) impacts every impor tant business measure… but they’ll also know only too well, that managing product costs is not easy.”


In Europe we have a strong history of enterprise product


cost management (PCM) practices and a proud tradition of recognising cost engineering experts and value analysis/value engineering (VAVE) teams that understand and specialise in


122 Fastener + Fixing Magazine • Issue 76 July 2012


n any strong discrete manufacturing and distribution business, such as those spearheading the European fastener and fixings industry, you will always find a broad range of people and departments with roles that are intended to


cost reduction to support core business functions. With relevant expertise in manufacturing processes, supplier management and quote estimation, these are all highly capable and valued experts with unique domain knowledge built up over time. However, the knowledge of these individuals is extremely difficult to replicate and scale across multiple products within a complex manufacturing business. It’s a challenge that must be met, and quickly. Every discrete manufacturer will be well aware that ‘Cost of


Goods Sold’ (COGS) impacts every important business measure for revenues, profits, time-to-market, competitive differentiation and more. But they’ll also know only too well, that managing product costs is not easy. Challenges exist at every level across product lifecycles. Engineering makes design decisions without understanding their true cost impact. Cost engineering decisions come either too late in the development process or even after product launch, causing delays in production and the reaping of cost benefits. Also sourcing professionals often don’t have sufficiently accurate information to negotiate preferred pricing with suppliers. The negative impacts of these challenges are very apparent: reduced profits, delayed time to market, limited product innovation. But how do manufacturers bridge that gap between


understanding the challenges and finding a rapid, effective solution?


Sweating the smaller stuff Within the discrete manufacturing there is usually strong


focus on the manufacturability and cost-optimisation of high-value, medium-to-high impact, strategic parts. This is understandable; however it can result in low-to-medium impact, or commodity parts, a bracket that embraces a high percentage of fastener and fixing components, crucially falling under the cost management radar. The reason for this may be due to a general acceptance that


there is little optimisation advantage in this area. The strategy of only performing cost optimisation on strategic, complex parts will not deliver maximised savings. PCM must be applied to all parts. Actually, such an oversight can easily result in a huge missed opportunity. This situation is a classic example of the ’80-20 rule’, sometimes referred to as the ‘Pareto Principle’. Roughly speaking, this would translate to around 80 percent of a manufacturer’s costs tied up with just 20 percent of its parts. As these are generally high-volume commodity parts, the resulting


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164