nouveau / liquid assets / preview / review Sténopé 2012 in Camera: Aube snapshot
The fifth consecutive vintage of Michel Chapoutier’s joint venture with Devaux is one of the collaboration’s best wines yet, says Simon Field MW
he Côte des Bar is all too often forgotten when one turns one’s mind to Champagne. The other undervalued enclave, Sézanne, is at least contiguous with the aristocratic vines of the Côte des Blancs. One has to travel 44 miles (70km) to the south, however, preferably taking a detour to experience the medieval splendor of Troyes, before one gets to the Côte des Bar. It is pretty— a little like Beaujolais—John Clare or AE Housman pastoral, and embraced by the River Aube, the origin of its nom de plume. Aube or Bar, call it what you will, it is most certainly underrated. One has only to taste the Champagnes of Michel Drappier or Cédric Bouchard and, increasingly, Devaux, to appreciate this. And let’s not forget the famous rosés and Pinots from Les Riceys, itself the largest single commune in the entire appellation. Enter stage right Michel Chapoutier, whose joint venture with Devaux— Sténopé—has now notched up its fifth consecutive vintage. In 2007, Michel bought two vineyards in Les Riceys— En Chanseux and Val Bazot—and he has not shied away from this particular lens of enquiry ever since. Sténopé, as a reminder, means a pinhole camera, furnishing your correspondent with a wealth of allusive potential—clichés, in both senses, included. Michel Chapoutier is best known, of course, for his peerless Northern Rhône range, the single-parcel Hermitages in particular. A natural curiosity has taken him to Alsace, Roussillon, Australia, and elsewhere. And now to Champagne, where the distinctive clay/limestone terroir of the Aube more closely resembles that of Chablis than the vineyards of the Marne. Not a trace of the granitic austerity of Hermitage, for sure. Chapoutier has been, by his standards, a relatively silent partner in this, allowing a healthy degree of autonomy to the long-standing chef de cave at Devaux, Michel Parisot. Michel’s two initial requests, however, were, first, that the wine should be released every
T
year, hence the quintet from 2008 onwards; and second, that oak should play a key part in the vinification. Chapoutier is known for his adherence to single varieties in the Northern Rhône (Syrah and Marsanne), but there are no such stipulations with Sténopé, its blend usually divided equally between Pinot Noir and Chardonnay, much of the former from the Chapoutier vines in Les Riceys. Parisot takes it all in his stride, describing the project as “a beautiful adventure.” No sign, yet, of a single-vineyard—a varietal Pinot de Riceys, say—or even a Coteaux Champenois cuvée, but I am told that both have been given serious consideration.
The best the Aube can offer The result provides us with an annual daguerreotype of the best that the Aube can offer. The decisive moment when Doisneau intimacy meets Cartier-Bresson formality, snapped up in a bottle. It is fascinating to compare Sténopé with examples from the heartland of Champagne; the style tends to be less taut and mineral-driven than the great wines of the Côte des Blancs, and maybe less overtly powerful than some of the Pinot Noir cuvées from the Montagne de Reims. The quid quo pro often lends the wines more overt fruit and a softer, more cushioned texture. Nothing especially Chablisien, it has to be said, but pleasingly different all the same. 2012 vies with 2008 for the top spot within the quintet. The challenges of hail,
76 | THE WORLD OF FINE WINE | ISSUE 79 | 2023 TASTING Lucky Cat restaurant, London, October 2022
Sténopé 2012 (magnum) (52% Chardonnay, 48% Pinot Noir; disgorged May 2021; dosage 5g/l)
We are privileged to taste this from both bottle and magnum, the not inconsiderable charms of the former more than redoubled in intensity in the latter. A core of southern generosity, softly spicy, with posset, apple charlotte, quince, and a hint of white pepper. The magnum is a little more closed at first; petrichor concedes slate, the Braeburns finely polished; plenty of fizz and energy—an understated gem, growing in stature with every sip. Later, this stature is put to the test by Lucky Cat’s Japanese-themed hors d’oeuvres; but neither the tuna and shiso tartare nor the beef tataki overwhelm. On the contrary, the Sténopé rises to the challenge with spicy gusto. The aperture should stay open for quite a while. | 93
frost, and rain in the early part of the year were annulled by an almost perfect mid-season, revisited with an unusually damp mid-August, this almost forgotten by harvest-time. The crop was modest in size but outstanding in quality. One can really appreciate, next to its forebear, the greater concentration and, for want of a better word, focus of the 2012, which shows especially well from a magnum. It has been vinified in 300-liter oak barrels (the wood sourced locally, second fill), with lees stirring over a period of nine months. Only the best of the first pressings (the tête de cuvée) have been used, and it has been dosed up to 5g/l. This year, Parisot decides to tell us the precise blend (previously he has been rather vague); it is 52 percent Pinot Noir and 48 percent Chardonnay, much of the latter from the village of Montgueux, which is known locally (and somewhat immodestly) as “the Montrachet of the south.” There is also a very small dose of old-vine (1913) Chardonnay from Chouilly in the Côte des Blancs, which reminds us that the wine has not exclusively been sourced in the Aube. The 2012 was disgorged in the late spring of 2021.
Photography courtesy of Sténopé
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220
