DAVID WILLIAMS WAS SIMILARLY
ENTHUSIASTIC: “A RUN OF SUCCULENT, WELL- MADE WINES […] THAT MORE THAN HOLD THEIR OWN IN THE GLOBAL CHARDONNAY CONTEXT”
natural balances, with an effortlessly carried inner amplitude. They are admirably unemphatic and sympathetic at table. Anthony Rose, too, admired their “attractive purity and concentration of aroma and of flavor,” and their “good freshness, balance, and immediate drinkability, without excessive acidity or indeed any hard edges,” both suggesting “winemakers with the confidence of knowing what they are trying to achieve—and, for the most part, achieving it.” David Williams was similarly enthusiastic: “A run of succulent, well-made wines […] that more than hold their own in the global Chardonnay context.” It’s worth mentioning, perhaps, that this was a tasting that inspired rare agreement among all three tasters; there were far fewer significant score disparities on our sheets than is usual in our tastings. Not everything was successful, of course. Winemaking mishaps were sometimes in evidence, as was evidence for a battle of the Willamette soul. Is West Coast opulence part of the Chardonnay identity here, or might early picking, manifested in a rigor that
sometimes flirts with austerity, constitute the nobler path? Wines in the former style could be clumsy and obvious on occasion, while those crafted leanly sometimes suggested Sauvignon Blanc or Aligoté more than Chardonnay. All our most admired wines seemed to explore the middle ground. (Only one wine in the top nine was labeled with less than 13% ABV.) What, finally, of the differences between all of those nested AVAs? “I wouldn’t say,” summarized Rose, “that subregional variation was quite as clear-cut to me as the difference in styles in Burgundy, for instance, as between the warmer Mâconnais and cooler Chablis.” Agreed, but note the clear difference in latitude; even Mâcon lies at a higher latitude than Portland itself (in the far north of the Willamette), let alone Chablis, so we shouldn’t expect the pulse of climate to play quite such a prominent role here. What was striking was that nearly half (five) of the tasting’s top 12 wines, based on compounded scores, were indeed vinified from fruit grown in Eola-Amity vineyards, bearing out specialist Simon Davies’s admiration for Chardonnay from this AVA.
THIS WAS A TASTING THAT INSPIRED RARE AGREEMENT AMONG ALL THREE TASTERS; THERE WERE FAR FEWER SIGNIFICANT SCORE DISPARITIES THAN IS USUAL IN OUR TASTINGS
ANDREW JEFFORD’S TOP WINES
Domaine Serene Chardonnay Evenstad Reserve 2019 96
Domaine Drouhin Arthur Chardonnay Dundee Hills Willamette Valley 2020 95
Morgen Long Willamette Valley Chardonnay 2019 95
00 Wines VGW Chardonnay 2018 94
Beaux Frères Willamette Valley Chardonnay 2020 94
Ponzi Vineyards Single Vineyard Avellana Laurelwood District Chardonnay 2019 94 Antica Terra Aequorin Chardonnay 2019 93
Ponzi Vineyards Chardonnay Laurelwood District 2019 93
WillaKenzie Estate Estate Cuvée Chardonnay 2019 93
Cristom Eola-Amity Hills Willamette Valley Chardonnay 2019 92
Crowley Four Winds Chardonnay Willamette Valley 2019 92 Flaneur Wines Bon Vivant Chardonnay 2019 92 Lingua Franca Sisters Chardonnay 2019 92
Walter Scott Freedom Hill Vineyard Chardonnay 2019 92
Abbott Claim Chardonnay Eola-Amity Hills Willamette Valley 2019 91
Adelsheim Staking Claim Chardonnay Chehalem Mountains Willamette Valley 2019 91
Grochau Cellars Chardonnay Brick House Vineyard Ribbon Ridge 2017 91
Left Coast Estate Truffle Hill Chardonnay 2020 91
Roserock Drouhin Oregon Chardonnay Eola-Amity Hills Willamette Valley 2020 91
AVERAGE AND RANGE OF SCORES Average
Range Tasting AJ AR DW
90 89 90 90
80–96 80–96 84–94 84–94
THE WORLD OF FINE WINE | ISSUE 79 | 2023 | 211
OREGON CHARDONNAY
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220