search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Valuation • Section 14


ology for determining the property value is the same in all scenarios. When determining the value of a property, there are generally three approaches that are considered:


A


1. Cost Approach 2. Sales Comparison Approach 3. Capitalization Approach


Cost Approach The cost approach is based on the premise that market par- ticipants relate value to cost. Appraisal concepts relating to this approach include substitution, supply and demand, con- tribution, externalities, and highest and best use.


In the cost approach, an opinion is formed of the cost of


all improvements, depreciating them to reflect any value loss from physical, functional, and external causes. Land value, entrepreneurial incentive, and depreciated improvement costs are then added, resulting in an opinion of value for the subject property.


The downside of the cost approach is that the deprecia-


tion estimates used are highly subjective, which can limit the reliability of the approach. Additionally, land sales within the local area, while well researched, can be limited; therefore, in today’s market, the most important and common use of the cost approach is to determine the feasibility of a new or a recently constructed project.


Sales Comparison Approach Using the sales comparison approach, an opinion of market value is determined by analyzing similar, recently sold prop- erties, and comparing them to the subject property. This method relies on the concepts of anticipation and change, including the principles of supply and demand, substitution, balance, and externalities.


This approach typically uses a unit of comparison such


as price per square foot of building area or effective gross income multiplier. Adjustments are applied to the unit of comparison from an analysis of comparable sales, and the adjusted unit of comparison is then used to derive an opin- ion of value for the subject property.


The sales comparison approach is applicable when there


is sufficient data on recent market transactions. In the case of the self-storage industry, the sales comparison approach provides good support but is not typically considered the pri- mary value indicator as self-storage facilities are purchased for their income streams. Additionally, the comparable sales can vary widely in terms of physical and locational character- istics which are typically addressed through an adjustment


Income Capitalization Approach The income capitalization approach first determines the income-producing capacity of a property by using contract rents on existing leases and by estimating market rent from rental activity at competing properties for the vacant space. Deductions are then made for vacancy and collection loss and operating expenses. The resulting net operating income is divided by an overall capitalization rate to derive an opin- ion of value for the subject property. The capitalization rate represents the relationship between net operating income and value. This method is referred to as direct capitaliza- tion. A discounted cash flow is also often utilized, and this creates a multi-year cash flow projection with a reversion in the final year. A variety of assumptions can be made to test the sensitivity of the cash flow. Additionally, this method al- lows for any anticipated variances in the 10-year hold of the investment, such as capital expenditures and/or changes in expenses. In this method, periodic cash flows are discount- ed to a present value using discount rate that is determined by analyzing current investor yield requirements for similar investments.


In today’s market, the income capitalization approach is


the most utilized method to determine the value of a prop- erty. The following is a step-by-step guide to developing a proforma and ultimately determining the value.


INCOME The first and most important step of valuing a facility is to understand and examine the income that is currently be- ing collected at the facility. The main source of income for self-storage properties is derived from the storage units. The most typical report utilized by valuation professionals is not actually the rent roll, rather it is the occupancy statistics re- port or unit mix report. This report sorts the units by type (typically drive-up and climate-controlled or by story) and then by size. From this report, a clear picture of the facility is


2018 Self-Storage Almanac 149


valuation of a property can be necessary for a variety of scenarios: buying, selling, refinancing, or challenging the real estate assessment. Fortunately, the method-


process. Furthermore, it is better to select newer sales from a broader geographic area than older sales with the same geographic area in today’s market where capitalization rates have declined. In fact, capitalization rates derived from recent sales are the most useful data extracted from this ap- proach for an investor.


Furthermore, it is better to select newer sales from a broader geographic area than older


sales with the same geographic area in today’s market where capitalization rates have declined.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180