search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Self-Storage Supply & Demand • Section 10 If we just start from a high level, and look at the national


self-storage construction data from the U.S. Census, in Janu- ary of 2017, the value of new self-storage facilities put in place was $226 million. In September of 2017, that monthly figure had increased to $404 million, roughly 79 percent more self-storage was put in place than earlier in the year. With the pace of construction increasingly at such a fast rate throughout 2017, it is likely that the total number of facilities that are going to be delivered in 2018 will be substantially higher than those delivered in 2017. Based on Union Realtime data, we believe that the total increase in supply will be four percent in 2017, with 2018 likely much higher. See Chart 10.3 on the opposite page.


Regions can reach tipping points


with new supply where the incremental new facility can have outsized impacts on the rental rate performance of a


market. Using Houston as an example, in 2017, prior to Hurricane Harvey, a combination of new supply and


slowing demand caused pricing to decline by over 30 percent vs. the prior year through the end of August.


What About 2019? As with the discussion around 2018 vs. 2017, there is a lot of variation in what market participants believe will happen to the pace of new supply deliveries in 2019. As we exit 2017, it is premature to make a defini- tive call on what level of development activity will be in 2019. Instead, we need to focus on the pace of lending and early-stage development activity, which had shown no marked signs of slowing through the end of 2017.


Whether development activity starts slowing in


2019 or later on, we caution builders and developers to understand how supply impacts a market and how a market’s equilibrium can be dramatically impacted from too much supply.


Houston We Had A Problem Regions can reach tipping points with new supply where the incremental new facility can have outsized impacts on the rental rate performance of a mar- ket. Using Houston as an example, in 2017, prior to


2018 Self-Storage Almanac 113


Hurricane Harvey, a combination of new supply and slowing demand caused pricing to decline by over 30 percent vs. the prior year through the end of August. While not every market with a supply problem will see this magnitude of rental rate declines, it underscores the importance of understanding your market.


Understanding Market Data To better understand the various metrics comprising and impacting any market area, the 2018 Almanac in partnership with Union Realtime, have provided snapshots of the Top 10 CBSAs on the following pages. Ranked by rentable square footage as seen in Table 10.1, these summaries provide a real- time holistic view of supply, demand, demographics, pricing, occupancy, promotions, and competition within the market.


The data in these market summaries should be seen as a


starting point, with the understanding that providers such as Union Realtime can drill down to provide even more specific market demographics and details.





1 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 2 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 3 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 4 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA 5


Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI


6 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 7 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 8 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 9


Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ


10 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Source: Union Realtime


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180