search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
GREEN MEANS GO...


CORONAVIRUS: AIR POLLUTION AND CO2 FALL RAPIDLY AS VIRUS SPREADS


Levels of air pollu- tants and warming gases over some cities and regions are showing signifi- cant drops as coronavirus impacts work and travel. Researchers in New York told the BBC their early results showed carbon mon- oxide mainly from cars had been re- duced by nearly 50% compared with last year. Emissions of the planet-heating gas CO2 have also fallen sharply. But there are warnings levels could rise rapidly after the pandemic. With global eco- nomic activity ramp- ing down as a result of the pandemic, it is hardly surprising that emissions of a variety of gases related to energy and transport would be reduced. Scientists say that by May, when CO2 emissions are at their peak thanks to the decomposition of leaves, the levels recorded might be the lowest since the financial crisis over a decade ago. While it is early days, data collected in New York sug- gested that ins- tructions to curb


unnecessary travel are having a signifi- cant impact. Traffic levels in the city were estimated to be down 35% compared with a year ago. Emissions of carbon monoxide, mainly due to cars and trucks, have fall- en by around 50% for a couple of days last month accord- ing to researchers at Columbia University. They have also found that there was a 5-10% drop in CO2 over New York and a solid drop in methane as well. Although there are a number of cav- eats to these findings, they echo the environmental impacts connected to the virus out- breaks in China and in Italy. An analysis carried out for the climate website Carbon Brief suggested there had been a 25% drop in energy use and emissions in China over a two- week period. This is likely to lead to an overall fall of about 1% in China’s carbon emissions this year, experts believe. Both China and Northern Italy have also recorded signif- icant falls in


chance to alter that outcome. They could insist, for instance, that any bailout of airlines would be tied to


far more


nitrogen dioxide, which is related to reduced car jour- neys and industrial activity. The gas is both a serious air pollutant and a pow- erful warming chemical. With aviation grind- ing to a halt and millions of people working from home, a range of emissions across many coun- tries are likely to be following the same downward path. While people work- ing from home will likely increase the use of home heating and electricity, the curbing of commut- ing and the general


slowdown in econ- omies will likely have an impact on overall emissions. Specialists believe that the shutdown will impact CO2 lev- els for the whole of this year.


“It will depend on how long the pan- demic lasts, and how widespread the slowdown is in the economy particular- ly in the US. But most


likely I think


we will see some- thing in the global emissions this year,” said Prof Corinne Le Quéré from the Uni- versity of East Anglia. “If it lasts another three or four


months, certainly we could see some reduction.” What’s likely to make a major differ- ence to the scale of carbon emissions and air pollution is how governments decide to re-stimu- late their economies once the pandemic eases.


Back in the 2008- 2009, after the global financial crash, carbon emis- sions shot up by 5% as a result of stimu- lus spending that boosted fossil fuel use.


In the coming months, govern- ments will have a


stringent reductions in aviation emissions. “Governments now have to be really cau- tious on how they re-stimulate their economies, mindful of not locking in fos- sil fuels again,” said Prof Le Quéré. “They should focus on those things that are ready to go that would lower emis- sions, such as ren- ovating buildings, putting in heat pumps and electric chargers. These are not complicated and can be done straight away, they are just waiting for financial incentives.” However, some ar- gue that if the pandemic goes on a long time, any stim- ulus would more likely focus on pro- moting any econ- omic growth regard- less of the impact on the environment. The only silver lin- ing, albeit small, could be learn- ing new practices to work remotely, thus buying a few years of lower growth allowing solar and wind to catch up.


78


APRIL 2020


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112