search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
4


He shares his concerns that a mayoralty “could become very politicised” in terms of investment decisions and questions whether the model is suitable for the rural nature of Lancashire.


He also believes that the people of Lancashire should make the decision saying: “It needs to be their choice”.


There is no doubt the Labour government’s preferred model is for elected mayors along with the streamlining of local government that would see many of our district councils disappear.


Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner spelled out the position in her speech to the Convention of the North in Preston in February. She has also urged Lancashire to move forward at pace.


Other parts of the North West have responded quickly. Cumbria is set to elect its mayor in 2026, as is Cheshire and Warrington. That will leave Lancashire out on its own.


The debate in the county has gone on for years, much to the frustration of the business community.


Ask any business leader in Lancashire to name major obstacles to economic growth in the county and you can be sure that the transport network will feature highly on the list.


In June the government announced a £15bn package of investment in transport infrastructure.


Greater Manchester received £2.5bn. Part of that funding will expand its tram network. The Liverpool city region’s slice of the pie was £1.6bn. The cash will allow it to take forward plans for a new rapid transit network.


West Yorkshire was handed £2.1bn which will enable it to start work on a tram system. Other transport improvements will aim to unlock regeneration across six key neighbourhoods bordering Leeds city centre.


And what did Lancashire receive from the pot? Absolutely nothing.


The money was shared out amongst areas that


Richard Slater chairman richard@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295584


Ged Henderson editor editor@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295585


Abbey Coates operations and events director abbey@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295585


Anna King


senior administrator anna@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295582


Paula Walsh finance assistant paula@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 297870


have an elected mayor in place, parts of the country that have grasped the opportunities devolution can deliver.


Sadly, it has become an all too familiar story with Lancashire, like parts of its transport network, crawling towards that destination.


For those who worry about the politics, we’d point out the relationship between Greater Manchester’s elected Labour mayor Andy Burnham and the Conservative government as an example of an approach that has put the needs of an area first.


And while the talk in Lancashire is of a referendum, in Greater Manchester it is about


The debate in the county has gone on for years, much to the frustration of the business community


Now it looks like the brakes may once again be applied, with the new county council ruling party Reform UK calling for a binding referendum on an elected mayor.


In an interview with Lancashire Business View featured in this issue, new County Hall leader Stephen Atkinson sets out his personal opposition to an elected mayor.


Joanne Hindley sales director joanne@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295585


Rob Kelly multimedia journalist rob@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 297870


Olivia McCaughran client engagement manager olivia@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295587


Adam Varnom graphic designer adam@lancashirebusinessview.co.uk t: 01254 295585


an ambitious ten-year plan to turbocharge growth and deliver tens of thousands of new jobs and homes for its residents. A plan to deliver £1bn of investment every year for the next decade and build homes on a scale and at a pace not seen in the past 20 years.


How absolutely game-changing would it be for Lancashire to be in that position?


Lancashire Business View is written, designed and produced in Lancashire by Northpoint Publishing.


Lancashire Business View and LBV are registered trademarks.


The views expressed by our columnists are not necessarily shared by Lancashire Business View.


Photography: Clive Lawrence, Liz Henson Photography and Paul Adams.


Printers: Peter Scott Printers, Burnley


Northpoint Publishing East Park Lodge, East Park Road, Blackburn BB1 8DW


t: 01254 297870 ISSN: 1757-479X


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94