search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
5.1 From lock-ins to transformative pathways


The fundamental changes needed to achieve the vision and dimensions presented in chapter 4 require a shared understanding, commitment and desire for profound, strategic and substantial change to tackle interconnected environmental and development challenges through the notion of “transformation”. In recent years, urban practitioners, policymakers, local authorities and communities, social movements and activists, think tanks and academics alike have shared thinking in this direction.


However, planning for such transformation is a massive challenge for cities, where policy and investment changes often occur incrementally and where systemic changes often require decades of consistent leadership, investment, and aligned effort. Change might typically begin with an inspiring project, a new policy, a new knowledge partnership, or an active coalition. Over time, these important first steps may become catalytic efforts towards the development of a transformation pathway, involving multi-faceted, articulated, sustained and scaled up efforts, leading over time to transformative changes at the city scale and beyond.


This chapter showcases some of the impressive efforts that cities have made in starting transformative processes to turn visions into actions that make a difference. The pathways and cases presented here are not intended to illustrate the best or only way to create transformative change, as no city has yet reached this ambitious goal. Rather, they offer key principles and practices of policymaking, planning, multilevel governance, citizen participation, technological development and other crucial elements that together pave the way for transformative change. It is important to recognize that in most cases, the outcomes achieved at the city level represent only a fraction of the potential transformation a city needs to produce to achieve social and environmental justice and the environmental sustainability objectives called for in GEO-6 (United Nations Environment Programme [UNEP] 2019). The real-world examples reviewed throughout this chapter point towards the successful restructuring of fundamental processes of governance that can sustain and eventually achieve these transformational outcomes in the longer term.


As shown in Figure 5.1 and discussed in chapter 2, designing and activating pathways towards sustainable and just outcomes requires simultaneous efforts and commitment to tackle deep-seated lock-in processes relating, in particular, to the political economy of cities, outdated urban planning approaches and exclusionary governance models. This shift requires addressing difficult trade-offs, working in an integrated fashion across visioning, planning, budgeting, procurement and operations, and confronting existing power structures and balances. It also requires improvements to be made in terms of technology and infrastructure, with specific emphasis on valorizing existing knowledge and low-tech approaches and on equitable access to new technology and related materials and product designs. Additionally, just transitions to urban


96 GEO for Cities


sustainability require changes in the education and training of urban professionals and managers, and changes in consumer preferences and behaviours.


This is no small task, which explains the tendency towards inertia in many cities, even as they adopt ambitious Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and other sustainability targets.


The importance of tackling these lock-ins should not be underestimated, as they mark the difference between current and desired outcomes and are key to counteracting natural resource extraction, carbon-intensive development, and environmentally damaging practices – the impacts of which are described in chapter 3 – all of which worsen social inequalities. In other words, once lock-ins have been overcome, transformative pathways are much more likely to succeed.


The term “pathways” describes the different ways in which institutions and city-makers create the enabling conditions, deliberative forums, policies, planning routes, markets, technologies, products and consumption choices that can achieve transformative results.


The establishment of a transformative pathway often begins from a single entry point: v Sometimes the process starts with the implementation of innovative policies;


v In other cases, transformative pathways occur through changes in the organizational and governance structure of urban institutions.


In some cases, pathways are led by the collective action of citizens and civil society organizations. A number of bold city actions that, over time, bring about the major environmental, resilience, equity and social justice changes described in chapter 4 are examined below. Moving towards this vision and these dimensions involves changes in socioeconomic, political and technological systems, as well as fundamental changes to culture, collective decision- making and individual behaviour.


Pathways might initially be triggered by forward-looking city strategies, reactions to local or global shocks, adaptations to chronic stresses or a combination of these factors (Levy et al. 2017). However, without paying careful attention to the multiple dimensions that enable pathways to become systemic and transformational, opportunities to advance the vision and dimensions described in chapter 4 can be missed. Focusing on each of these three dimensions, this chapter examines the entry points, opportunities and precedents that these pathways can build upon. Each pathway contains case studies used to demonstrate how it might be shaped, based on a large amount of empirical evidence of success and trade-offs.


While real-world examples of significant urban transformations are not always easy to identify, the examples in this chapter aim to show how transformative pathways are being crafted in practice and why they


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146