search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Building upon these ideas, this section explores four distinctive approaches through which pathways towards nature-positive, just and equitable urban development are built in practice (Figure 5.10).


The case studies in this section show how initiatives and processes that are allowed to mature over time provide room for reflexive learning, which in turn expands the scope for transformative change.


5.5.1 Renaturing the city with equity


The notion that cities should be designed with and not against nature is not new, but has re-emerged in recent years (McHarg 1969; Steiner et al. 2019).8


Under the wide umbrella


of “urban greening”, “biophilic cities” and the “renaturing” of cities, there is a growing call for collective action to protect biodiversity in and around cities in order to ultimately prevent irreversible loss and damage to the natural systems on which humankind depends. This is known as a “nature-positive” approach to urban development.


In this pathway, nature-based solutions should be adopted across different urban systems and ecosystems, for example, in coastal cities where urban landscapes and seascapes meet and where human behaviour and urban development have profound impacts on both terrestrial and marine ecosystems (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific 2019). This


field is now evolving from its original focus on economic and instrumental values to encompass a more critical and holistic perspective on justice and equity issues (Randrup et al. 2020).9


Responses to calls for renaturing cities include


Barcelona’s Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Plan 2020, Melbourne’s vision to enhance the city’s biodiversity and human well-being by restoring native vegetation through nature-based solutions, and Shanghai’s ambition to become a “sponge city” for flood prevention through the replacement of concrete sidewalks with permeable pavements, street rain gardens and rooftop gardens.


Meanwhile, other cities are engaging in participatory processes that guide environmentally sustainable regeneration in targeted derelict areas, a trend observed across many American cities, which have transformed previous rail corridors into public greenways under the Rails-to-Trails initiative, while also providing havens and habitat for wildlife (Scherrer et al. 2021). A similar approach has been adopted in Berlin, where citizen action has led the transformation of the disused Tempelhof airport into one of the city’s most popular parks. Formerly, a symbol of Nazi megalomania, in 2014 the park was at risk of privatization due to pressure from investors to capitalize on its real estate development potential (Bijak and Racoń-Leja 2018). However, the site was reclaimed as part of the city’s commons, thanks to the action of 100% Tempelhofer Feld [100% Tempelhofer Field], a group of civil society organizations that act as environmental stewards to conserve the park’s biodiversity and prevent its development (Schalk 2014).


Figure 5.10: Pathways for nature-positive, just and equitable urban development


Securing the right to the city for multiple species by transforming and grounding urban gover nance processes and deepening democratic practices.


Building justice beyond the city, tackling the impacts that cities impose upon distant ‘elsewheres’.


Injecting equity considerations – such as racial justice- into the pursuit of environ- mental sustainability.


Re-naturing the city to enhance health and well-being of all citizens, urban biodiversity, the


provision of ecosystem services and resilience to climate change shocks. electrified transportation systems.


8 Since 2008, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has included a focus on cities and subnational governments. The Plan of Action on Subnational Governments, Cities and Other Local Authorities for Biodiversity (2011–2020), adopted in 2010, has helped cities coordinate local and national biodiversity strategies and action plans. The Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework will guide implementation for the coming decade in pursuit of the 2050 vision of “living in harmony with nature”. In addition, CitiesWithNature – a joint initiative by ICLEI, The Nature Conservancy and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), with support from the CBD – provides an international platform for cities to enhance their urban nature and work towards greater sustainability.


9 Race and gender equality considerations have played a key role in expanding the scope of current debates and practices. For example, the work of GenderCC – Women for Climate Justice is an example of the emerging global networks that are seeking to overcome gender-blindness throughout the world. GenderCC is a broad coalition that works throughout the Global North and Global South to ensure that gender-responsive approaches are implemented in urban climate adaptation, mitigation and low-carbon development. For more information about GenderCC’s work, see https:// www.gendercc.net/home.html.


Achieving Urban Transformation: From Visions to Pathways


113


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146