search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
use change, are increasing at 0.6 per cent a year. As of 2018, the resulting atmospheric CO2


concentration is 407.4 parts


per million and the global temperature has risen by of 1.0˚ C (IPCC 2018; Friedlingstein et al. 2019; World Meteorological Organization [WMO] 2019a). The second major human- influenced greenhouse gas is methane (CH4). A recent study estimated 575 million tons of CH4 were emitted per year from 2008 to 2017, with 60 per cent of emissions caused by direct human activity such as agriculture, waste management and activities related to fossil fuels (Saunois et al. 2020). The warming impacts cities by increasing their mean and extreme temperatures, changing precipitation patterns (resulting in droughts and floods) and increasing the frequency and intensity of cyclonic storms, as well as contributing to rising sea levels (IPCC 2018). These climate pressures impact human health through exposure to extreme temperatures, increased air pollution due to air circulation stagnation events, reduced quality food and water, changes in infectious agents, and population displacement (Balbus et al. 2016).


Air quality is currently the largest environmental health risk in cities (UNEP 2019). Globally, poor air quality contributes to 6–7 million premature deaths every year due to outdoor (ambient) and indoor (household) air pollution (Health Effects Institute 2020; World Health Organization [WHO] 2020). Air pollutants know no boundaries: the air quality of cities can be significantly impacted by human and natural activities outside their jurisdiction. The fact that cities cannot control emissions from outside their boundaries presents an urban governance challenge for air quality mitigation strategies. There are only a few examples of transboundary initiatives to improve air quality, including the California Air Resources Board in the United States and the 1979 Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution, a pioneering instrument that established a regional framework covering Europe, North America, and Russia and former East Bloc countries to reduce transboundary air pollution (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe [UNECE] 2019). More effort is needed to establish air pollution control strategies within cities and across jurisdictions to reduce the human health impacts of these pollutants. It is important to emphasize that air quality and climate change are linked, from their sources, which are primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels, through to their impacts (for example, urban heat islands affect the concentration of air pollutants in cities). As such, they must be addressed in a coordinated manner (Melamed, Schmale and von Schneidemesser 2016).


Dust storms are an example of global environmental changes impacting the climate and air quality in both urban and non-urban spaces (UNEP, WMO and UNCCD 2016) Events such as the Saharan dust storm in June 2020, are expected to become more intense due to increased warming in the North Atlantic and weaker Azores Highs (Clifford et al. 2019). The June 2020 dust storm was the largest such storm in decades. Atmospheric circulation patterns transported dust from the Sahara Desert across the Atlantic Ocean, increasing air pollution across the Caribbean, the south-east of the United States, Mexico and Central America (Çapraz and Deniz 2020; Farahani and Arhami


2020; Freedman, Cappucci and Samenow 2020; Soleimani et al. 2020). The impacts on human health, weather and climate are currently being studied (United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2020).


Other examples include the extreme wildfire seasons in Australia and the United States in 2020, fuelled by record temperatures and severe droughts. Smoke from the wildfires temporarily resulted in the worst air quality in the world in Canberra (Vardoulakis et al. 2020) and San Francisco (Cabanatuan 2020). Located at the wildland–urban interface, the fires destroyed many homes, which affected the composition of the smoke. There is still a significant amount to learn about the emissions and chemical processes that occur during wildland–urban interface fires and their impact on human health (National Academies 2020).


3.2.2 Biodiversity


Biodiversity is directly linked to the quality of life of urban citizens, providing a multitude of benefits for humans from ecosystem services and nature’s contributions to people.3 Such services include provisioning (food), regulating (filtering for clean air and water), supporting (underlying and enabling the production of all other ecosystem services) and culture (recreational and aesthetic enjoyment). Biodiversity comprises the biotic natural resources that underpin humanity and urban settlements and allow them to thrive. The world is currently experiencing rapid biodiversity loss (Díaz et al. 2019; Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services [IPBES] 2019; UNEP 2019). The current rate of global species loss is estimated to be at least tens to hundreds of times greater than the average historical rate of extinction over the past 10 million years, and continues to accelerate, threatening a sixth planetary extinction event within a few centuries (Barnosky et al. 2011; Pimm et al. 2014; Ceballos et al. 2015; Ceballos, Ehrlich and Dirzo 2017; IPBES 2019, section 2.2.5.2.4).


Biodiversity loss impacts cities through the loss of ecosystem functions and the services they provide. Yet biodiversity loss is not inherent to cities: they can also be rich in biodiversity (Elmqvist et al. 2013; Aronson et al. 2014; Ives et al. 2016). Moreover, maintaining biodiversity can provide with significant cost savings. It is key for maintaining functional ecosystems, adapting to other environmental challenges like climate change and providing benefits for humans (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2003; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2004; Haines-Young and Potschin 2010; Díaz et al. 2018; Díaz et al. 2019). For example, the loss of insect species that pollinate crops and other vegetation outside the city (a regulating ecosystem service) lowers agricultural productivity, leading to food insecurity (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United


3 Although they are similar, it is possible to distinguish between ecosystem services and Nature’s Contributions to People. The former focus on the benefits society receives from ecosystems (see, for example Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2003; The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity [TEEB] 2011; International Union for the Conservation of Nature 2013; Convention on Biological Diversity 2015; MacKinnon et al. 2019). In contrast, the latter considers both their positive and negative contributions (see, for example, Pascual et al. 2017; Díaz et al. 2018; Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services 2019). While this distinction is important, for clarity, we have opted to use the term ecosystem services, since it is more familiar. However, as Kadykalo et al. (2019) note, Nature’s Contributions to People is a broader concept.


The State of the Environment in Cities


47


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146