search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Figure 2.4: Effects of political economy lock-ins


Political economy


Economic structural drivers


lock-Ins


Empowers vested interests


Perpetuate Deepen


Existing systems of power


Unjust distributions of benefits of environmental initiatives


Burdens of


environmental impacts


Inequities in urban


development models


carbon aspirations described in chapter 4. Crucially, this general trend applies as much to informal economies as it does to the “recorded” or formal economy, which means it affects the broad economic base that underpins most cities. Examples ranging from just-in-time production processes in the fashion industry, to the dependence of technology firms on essential – and often rare – minerals, illustrate the strong interdependence between urban and peri-urban informal economies and the global economic processes and financial drivers at work in international value chains (Kelly 2019; Chen and Carré eds. 2020).


People living in and managing cities are not solely responsible for perpetuating these environmentally unsustainable economic models. In fact, the transformational work of actors at the city level is often hindered by economic processes at national and international levels that measure success in terms of gross domestic product (Shehabi 2020) and are bound up with the resource-extractive logic of global trade and the imperative of shareholder profit (Kavanagh and Veldman 2020). The growing allure of urban land for global capital flows also means that many cities feel trapped in “there is no alternative” growth scenarios. Changing these conceptions and practices to fully include the notions of finite planetary


resources, and cities and urban areas as common goods, is therefore a multi-actor, multi-scale, endeavour that goes beyond the sole remit of city actors. However, many cities and city-based actors play an active role in such processes. They proactively participate in global economic competition and adopt or maintain approaches based on the intensive use of resources, entrepreneurship and real estate development that contribute to the increasing commodification of urban life (Shin, Lees and López-Morales 2015; Shatkin 2017). Such approaches contrast with long- standing evidence of their environmental costs (Revi et al. 2014; UNEP 2019a) and their impact on deepening social, infrastructure and spatial divides in urban settings (Sassen 1991; Graham and Marvin 2001).


Structural drivers of environmentally unsustainable urbanization also affect the many cities that play a smaller role in the global economy. These include cities bypassed by evolving global demand, such as the rust-belt cities of Europe and North America, small and medium-sized cities in parts of Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia, and cities like Havana that are purposefully excluded for geopolitical reasons. Cities and urban areas on the margins of global economic networks face major barriers to just transformations. These are often rooted in weak or even


Urban Dynamics for Environmental Action 27


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146