search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Insight UK Responsible Gaming


responsibilities seriously and using their own databases to help staff identify excluded customers.


Many other projects and initiatives are under way, all of them geared towards promoting responsible gambling. One example is a project by Focal Research, a Canadian company which has spent more than 20 years developing algorithms to identify high-risk gambling patterns amongst customers. Operators are providing data relating to high-risk machine play to help shape and test their research. It will pose some important questions for casinos: are customers playing the most intensively necessarily those at most risk? At what stage should managers intervene to provide advice?


Te fact that operators are willing to engage in this project and, potentially, face challenging questions, shows their commitment to the spirit, not just the letter, of the law. Tere are many other Playing Safe projects I could also mention; for example, a pilot project being carried out with two operators to assess how young people, aged 18-30, respond to messaging about gambling and whether enough is being done to tailor messages specifically for this age group. Another example was a workshop run by the Alzheimer’s Society to help staff identify customers with mental health issues or learning difficulties. After being piloted with one operator, a training module has been developed, which will now be rolled out across the sector.


If the casino sector is serious about promoting responsible gambling, operators need to do two things: communicate with customers directly and communicate with their own staff – because they are the ones who deal face-to-face with customers and have the best opportunity to deliver the right messages.


A recent research project commissioned by the Industry Group for Responsible Gambling (IGRG) identified more than 200 examples of good practice across the sector and I want to ensure these are shared across all operators. Examples include:


l


Dedicated slot host training, focused on responsible gambling - including a ‘myth buster’ video about how machines work


l


training all staff, using the Gambling Compliance module ‘Understanding Problem Gambling’ built in consultation with Gambling Terapy


l


facial recognition technology to reinforce voluntary self-exclusion


l


all-day training courses for managers in interacting with customers


l


an executive awareness Programme - executive and main board members must visit Gamcare to see their work first hand


l


quarterly responsible gambling committee meetings attended by the senior leadership team


Tis is just a snapshot of the day-to-day activity taking place in the industry. Casinos are the most highly-regulated sector in the gambling industry – they sit at the top of the regulatory pyramid and operators want to ensure they earn the tag of being the safest places in the UK to gamble.


Operators want sustainable customers who enjoy playing, don’t lose more than they can afford and want to come back on a regular basis. Tat’s core to their business model – it’s why casinos talk to their customers about responsible gambling as part of a healthy, everyday dialogue.


NEWSWIRE / INTERACTIVE / 247.COM P35


Many other projects and initiatives are under way, all of them geared towards promoting responsible gambling. One example is a project by Focal Research, a Canadian company which has spent more than 20 years developing algorithms to identify high-risk gambling patterns amongst customers. Operators are providing data relating to high-risk machine play to help shape and test their research. It will pose some important questions for casinos: are customers playing the most intensively necessarily those at most risk? At what stage should managers intervene to provide advice?


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92