search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Japan, South East Asia, Australia, South America - there is a great deal of dynamism elsewhere in the world – why is Europe your market of choice right now?


It is easy to get caught up in massive gaming projects, but what moves the needle for a giant such as Las Vegas Sands? What moves the needle for MGM? If you look at market cap/share price, their business model consists of huge hotels, enormous casinos – and for Sands, a massive conventions business. Te only place for them is somewhere like Japan, because they are willing to spend US$10bn to move the needle for their shareholders. Sands had a great property in Pennsylvania, a large one that was very successful – but when Singapore is generating 400 million EBITDA per quarter, you need a major project to move the needle. 100 million EBITDA in Pennsylvania just isn’t an interesting long-term proposition. Japan is in the crosshairs, but it’s a long haul process of lobbying, studying, planning, designing, investing and building. When you finally open your US$10bn resort in Okinawa prefecture, that’s an incredibly long process over many years, which is hard work in a different way. I’m building in Europe today because I see how the pieces fit together.


There are major resort projects either being built or under-planning right now in Europe – Melco in Cyprus and Hard Rock in Spain. Are they your direct competitors?


I think the difference is that Olympic Entertainment Group is already successful in the European market with a range of operational models that we continue to expand upon. We operate in markets in which we have a multitude of locations in the right areas that are


P44 NEWSWIRE / INTERACTIVE / MARKET DATA


“Olympic Entertainment Group is already successful in the European market with a range of operational models that we continue to expand upon. We operate in markets in which we have a multitude of locations in the right areas that are especially good at servicing local clientele. It’s a service model that’s very successful and we know it works in multiple geographies.” Corey Plummer, CEO, Olympic Entertainment Group


especially good at servicing local clientele. It’s a service model that’s very successful and we know it works in multiple geographies.


Melco is entering Europe for the first time. Tey know how to build a resort and have been successful in South East Asia – but the operating model from Macau and the Philippines is very different to Europe, and even more complicated in certain parts of Europe. It’s an especially steep learning curve for operators like Melco, which means I don’t see them as competition. I don’t think they have the same kind of ambition. Tey have a project – they may have another one – but I don’t think their goal is to build multiple resorts all across Europe. In terms of Hard Rock, it is a great brand that also has restaurants and hotels. I think that if Hard Rock expands seriously into European gaming the market will benefit as a whole. I think that we need to educate the consumer as to what’s possible and Hard Rock could play a part in achieving that goal.


When are we going to see the next step in terms of Olympic expansion into Europe?


You’ll see the next step in the near-term. We have analytically mapped all of Europe and know where value adding targets are located and what appears to be actionable. One of the challenges we face early on is that many of the local operators see publicly listed digital companies with extremely high valuations and believe their local retail business should be valued in the same way.


While we have been able to educate some, others need to understand it’s unrealistic to expect those multiples for their businesses. In fact, many of the digital acquisitions were over priced and we’re starting to see those multiples falling. I think this is part of the game.


I was able to work with the capital investors to acquire the company because I saw the value of the Olympic model, both now and into the future. I outlined the strategy for the business and the value creation plan – it is my vision. It has been for many years. We all know that private equity tends to be short-term investors in their specific portfolio companies, but my vision for Europe is long-term. Te shareholders are supportive of that vision for Olympic and I am committed to that ambition for Europe.


Te company has been very successful for 25 years doing things a certain way, and to become much bigger we need to add new capabilities. Tere is a transformation process and an expansion and growth process to manage. It involves the same processes as many private equity deals, with agreements built upon establishing relationships over many years.


Integrity, commitment and focus are key parts to building quality relationships between management and private equity. Te same goes for entrepreneurs and management teams we want to work with and acquire businesses from. It’s all about timing, relationship building and validation, and it’s a process that I am very comfortable with.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124