x
SCIENCE WORLD – THE FISHER SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY EXPERIENCE
Prominent Speakers Captivate Audience By Heather Hobbs
At Science World – The Fisher Scientific Laboratory Experience visitors were treated to two thought provoking seminars from Lord Professor Robert Winston and Professor David Bellamy.
Speaking to a packed auditorium, Professor Winston questioned how scientists engage with the general public, particularly in relation to ethical issues. “It is very clear in a modern society, (that) we have to be much more responsive and recognise that the adverse effects of the things that we do does impact on society as much as us and therefore the ethical responsibility is something that we need to think about afresh.”
“In my view there needs to be a contract between the people who invent the technology and society. The plea is really for scientific responsibility… and for people to be more aware of the ethical implications of the science that they do. They also need to be more aware of a need for dialogue with the public, not merely to communicate, but to listen to their anxieties and respond better to them.” He pointed out that since mankind first began to use tools, advances in technology which have brought intended benefits to specific areas of application, might also prove in time to be beneficial to totally different market sectors, which could result in good or more questionable outcomes. As an example he considered the development of lasers, which accelerated advances in medicine and then also played a positive role in the development of DVD’s. Equally, he pointed out, some facilities where lasers are being used for attempts at nuclear fusion, might really have been designed for nuclear weapons. He argued that: “every technology has a downside that might not be recognised at the time,” and that control of such technological advances “should not be left to Government who might have other agendas.”
Recognising the increasing momentum of new discoveries and changes that impact directly on today’s society, he points out that this inevitable trend also probably supplies the best solutions to deal with consequences arising from applications of new research or inventions: “Although we should try to be more aware of these downsides.. I think, so far in the history of mankind we have managed to improve our lot and by using advances in technology have managed to control the worst aspects of it.”
He also noted that sometimes too much emphasis is placed on promising developments rather than on what is potentially achievable today: “We hugely hyped up the human genome when it was published 8 or 9 years ago, - but it has not been of much value yet and the idea that this is the most important biological invention –well it may be true, but it’s yet to be demonstrated how valuable it will be.”
“In fact, I think the ability to make a transgenic animal is much more important,.. because it helps us understand how genes function and this is particularly important now in the field of epigenetics.”
Summing up Professor Winston added “We can’t predict where we are going – what we can do is try to anticipate some of the bad effects and make certain that society is on board with that – this is the important message for today’s society.”
Presenting his viewpoint enthusiastically on global warming to an equally crowded theatre during the afternoon, Professor David Bellamy believes that climate change throughout history has been cyclical and is not caused by man-made interference, despite current recorded increases in carbon dioxide levels.
Professor David Bellamy
“In 1947 we had the hottest summer and the coldest winter in one year and this sort of thing makes me wonder about the idea that just people can screw the climate of the world up. If we even wanted to double the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, we would have to burn all the known oil reserves, all the known gas reserves and a third of the coal and we still couldn’t do it”, he commented.
“2000 years ago the Romans were making red wine in Scotland. The temperature at that time must have been much higher.” He also presented a graph that detailed temperature patterns over the last 1,000 years. This described the mediaeval warm period from around 1000 – 1400 during which time the Vikings colonised Greenland before temperatures again fell to minus figures; and there then followed a period described as the ‘Little Ice Age’ which lasted from around 1400 to early 1900’s, during which time the River Thames in London froze over 26 times.
“We have just had the worst winter since 1963 and I believe it’s a cycle, so hurray for the cycles of natural climate change.”
Lord Professor Robert Winston On the question of whether the amount of
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220
