22
Monitoring Matrix Complexity During Ultra-Trace Level Multi-Residue Pesticide Analysis
The RADAR-enabled Xevo TQ-S method enables the collection of spectral information on background components in the sample matrix while simultaneously collecting MRM data for the quantitation of target pesticides.
GOAL
To analyse multiple pesticide residues in food matrices to ultra-trace concentrations while simultaneously monitoring matrix background complexity.
In this technical brief, we describe the unique capability of Xevo™ TQ-S, which allows the monitoring of matrix complexity during ultra-trace multi-residue pesticide analysis.
THE APPROACH
High sensitivity determination of multiple pesticide residues in grape, avocado, marjoram, and ginger was performed using Waters® DisQuE™ Dispersive SPE (QuEChERS) and ACQUITY UPLC®
coupled with Xevo TQ-S.
Typical reversed-phase conditions were used for ACQUITY UPLC separations with formic acidmodified mobile phase to aid positive ion electrospray. Xevo TQ-S was operated with RADAR,™ as shown in Figure 1. RADAR is an information-rich acquisition approach that allows you to track your target analytes with precision in MRM mode, while simultaneously scanning the background for all other components.
Figure 1. RADAR-enabled Xevo TQ-S method showing multiple target MRMs for pesticide residues with a continuous background monitoring full scan function.
BACKGROUND
One of the biggest challenges in ensuring the safety of our food supplies is the measurement of hazardous ultra-trace level components in the presence of a highly complex sample matrix. For the analysis of pesticides in food matrices, the increased use of liquid chromatography systems coupled with tandem quadrupole mass spectrometers has allowed progress in reducing the problems caused by the sample matrix. However, difficulties remain when trying to discriminate against matrix components that exhibit similar physiochemical properties. Unawareness of these difficulties in each unique sample can lead to poor quality results, and can impact a laboratory’s performance and reputation.
The ability to understand the matrix challenge of each injected sample is clearly beneficial as is the ability to monitor changes in the sample matrix between samples and batches. This capability can lead to the continuous improvement of analytical quality in the laboratory. When operated in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode, conventional LC tandem quadrupole systems do not allow the direct monitoring of the sample matrix during routine high sensitivity determinations.
Rapid acquisition rates, fast switching between MS/MS and MS, and high sensitivity are all required to accurately measure the concentrations of a large number of residues and simultaneously acquire valuable full scan data. Figure 2 shows the chromatographic data obtained during RADAR-enabled analysis of grape, avocado, marjoram, and ginger samples spiked at the lower level (0.01 mg/kg) European maximum residue limit (MRL).
The simultaneously acquired full scan data allows the observation of the matrix challenge for every individual sample injected.
PRODUCT FOCUS FROM WATERS
Figure 3. Extracted MRM chromatogram for dimethoate in grape (0.01 mg/kg) with overlaid simultaneous full scan and extracted mass chromatogram of co-eluting matrix component. Also shown (inset) is mass spectrum of co-eluting component.
This information can help identify areas of potential ion suppression, as well as aid in the development of further clean-up and matrix reduction strategies. It can also help track method clean-up efficiency and any changes in sample matrix that may occur as different batches of samples are analysed.
With simultaneous full scan capability, matrix components that co-elute with MRM target analytes can be investigated by interrogating the “always available” spectral data. In the tested grape samples, RADAR allowed a co-eluting matrix component to be observed with the pesticide dimethoate, as shown in Figure 3.
SUMMARY
The RADAR mode of acquisition enables the collection of spectral information on background components in the sample matrix while simultaneously collecting MRM data for the quantitation of target pesticides. Operating the Xevo TQ-S in the RADAR mode does not compromise the quality of the quantitative MRM data.
Figure 2 . RADAR-enabled acquisitions of grape (matrix 1 g/mL), avocado (matrix 1 g/mL), marjoram (matrix 0.1 g/mL), and ginger (matrix 0.1 g/mL) spiked at the lower level 0.01 mg/kg European MRL. Coloured chromatogram is MS2 full scan spectrum. Also shown in the overlay is a selection of simultaneously acquired pesticide MRMs.
This mode of operation is beneficial when monitoring for the presence of ultra-trace contaminants in food. The information provided can help a laboratory develop reliable and robust methods, understand the matrix challenge of each individual sample, monitor cleanup efficiency, and observe intra- and inter- sample batch variations. This ultimately can lead to an improvement in data quality which in turn translates to more success with business activities that are reliant on the performance of the laboratory.
Circle no. 42
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220
