search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Spectroscopy Focus


Recent Advances in the Methodology for Environmental and Food Matrix Analysis - a report on the 5th National Conference on Environmental Mass Spectrometry


The oral and poster presentations were chosen specifically to reflect and balance the interests and activities of the mass spectrometry community interested in environmental & food analysis and the commercial and service organisations that meet these needs.


This meeting, held on March 24th at the University of Chester, was an environmental mass spectrometry special interest group (EMSSIG) series event forming a part of the BMSS SIG meetings.


The main theme focussed on ‘Recent Advances in the Methodology for Environmental and Food Matrix Analysis’ and was linked to the Food and Nutrition SIG coordinated by Dr Simon Hird, thereby forming part of a conference week, during which three meetings were organised by Professor Chris Smith, which highlighted Nanotechnology and Food, and, Food Science and Technology.


In keeping with a trend in previous environmental sessions, now generalised at the BMSS annual meetings, several presentations highlighted the applications of mass


spectrometry in highly topical areas. The meeting had an international flavour with presenters and delegates from Europe and the Middle East.


Since the last meeting in 2008 the pressure on Analysts to monitor ever-increasing numbers of compounds which are suspected (or convicted) of causing health problems to humans and wildlife is increasing. Some of the compounds that were of academic interest in terms of methodology design are now subject to legislation in terms of specific maximum levels which may be tolerated never more so than in the Food and Flavours sector. New emerging environmentally pollutants (EEP) originate from a variety of sources thus making the task for the analyst more difficult. The practitioners, in tandem with the Instrument manufacturers have risen to meet the challenge and this meeting gave a fascinating overview of where we currently are and, having a vested interest in our environment and the food chain, in seeing progress on all fronts.


Over 50 delegates (some of whom are shown in Figure 1) attended the meeting. To complement the Plenary and Session oral presentations by eminent scientists, 11 companies formed a trade show, which ran through the day to give an overview of commercially available products and solutions.


Dr Davoli started by outlining the fact that in the last years the overall trends in analytical techniques for environmental analysis have been oriented towards high performance instrumentation capable of higher sensitivity and specificity. Mass spectrometry is one of the most important techniques for environmental analysis and the development of multistage and hybrid mass spectrometers (MS) increased the potential for highly complex environmental samples, but trace and ultra-trace analysis of environmental samples always pose difficulties due to sample complexity.


He further outlined the point that advanced techniques in environmental, pharmaceutical, forensic and other analytical fields are routinely used with multistage MS, mainly coupled to liquid chromatography, for targeted analysis. The use of triple quadrupoles coupled with HPLC, a very well established technique still brings new data about the environment, like pharmaceuticals and drug of abuse presence in surface water. As the MS complexity increases, specificity increases, bringing more and more sensitivity.


Sample preparation, always an extremely delicate step, can be reduced more and more, down to almost zero, for specific applications, such as food contamination. The orbitrap is a new mass analyser, which has been commercially available since 2005. The main feature of this mass analyser is the high resolution, and a relatively simple instrument operation and maintenance. The orbitrap offers large space charge capacity, high mass accuracy (1-5 ppm) and dynamic range greater than 103


thus allowing not


only sample preparation reduction, but also chromatography, even for environmental samples. Data was presented for direct identification of drugs of abuse in surface water.


Author Details:


Bernie Monaghan, Contributing Editor, Separation Sciences and Spectroscopy, International Labmate Ltd. Email: bernie@intlabmate.com


Figure 1. Attending Delegates


To open the meeting, the plenary lecture was given by Dr Enrico Davoli, Mario Negri, Milan, Italy whose talk was entitled ‘A Review of Advanced MS Techniques in environmental studies: advantages and current limitations’.


As mass spectrometry is the only technique capable of compounds identification at trace levels, it is fundamental to have available software systems as an aid in data mining. Still outstanding, for everyday needs however, is a lack of automated data interpretation for high resolution and tandem instrumentation.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220