search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Hendricks—Miocene Conidae from the Gatun Formation of Panama Subgenus Pyruconus Olsson, 1967


Type species.—Conus patricius Hinds, 1843 from the Recent of the eastern Pacific, designated by Olsson (1967).


Remarks.—Tucker and Tenorio (2009) recognized Pyruconus as a genus of Conidae comprising two extant species from the eastern Pacific, C. patricius Hinds, 1843 and C. fergusoni Sowerby II, 1873. While the two species share large shells, large opercula, thick periostraca, and similar radulae, the molecular phylogenetic analysis of Puillandre et al. (2014) did not support the close relationship between the two species that is suggested by morphological data. Despite this, the classification of Puillandre et al. (2015) retained both species in Pyruconus, which was recognized as a subgenus of Conus (see further dis-


cussion in Hendricks, 2015). If future phylogenetic work con- firms that C. patricius and C. fergusoni belong to different clades, a new subgeneric name for the clade that includes C. fergusoni will be necessary. This issue has bearing on the pre- sent study because one species from the Gatun Formation, Conus recognitus Guppy, 1867, bears close resemblance to C. patricius, while another Gatun species, Conus molis Brown and Pilsbry, 1911, is very similar to C. fergusoni. For the sake of recognizing and communicating the present taxonomic uncer- tainty concerning the membership of Pyruconus, fossil species that are more similar to C. recognitus are referred informally to “Pyruconus I,” while those that are more similar to C. fergusoni are referred to “Pyruconus II.” Conus patricius is vermivorous (Nybakken, 1988; Tenorio


et al., 2012) and the similar radular tooth structure of C. fergusoni, as well as its overall phylogenetic position (Puillandre et al., 2014), strongly suggests that it shares this feeding ecology. Thus, a vermivorous feeding ecology may also be assumed for fossil species assigned to Pyruconus I and II.


Conus (Pyruconus I) recognitus Guppy, 1867 Figure 11.1–11.7


1850 Conus solidus Sowerby I, p. 45 (not Conus solidus Gmelin, 1791, which, according to Kohn [2014], is a junior synonym of Conus mappa [Lightfoot, 1786], an extant western Atlantic species).


1866 Conus solidus; Guppy, p. 287, pl. 16, fig. 1. 1867 Conus recognitus Guppy, p. 171. 1876 Conus recognitus; Guppy, p. 527. 1917 Conus recognitus; Maury, pl. 7, fig. 9. 1921 Conus recognitus; Pilsbry, pl. 19, fig. 2.


825


Republic, the species is known to occur in both the upper Miocene Cercado Formation (personal observation) and lower Pliocene Gurabo Formation (Hendricks, 2015), so the type stratum could potentially be either formation (Woodring, 1970, also reported the species from the Baitoa Formation of the Dominican Republic, presenting another possibility). Guppy (1866) reported the species (as Conus solidus) from Jamaica (presumably from the Pliocene Bowden Formation) and later (Guppy, 1876) from Haiti (stratum unknown). Woodring (1970) was the first to report the species from Panama based on a single specimen (USNM 645736; Fig. 11.1) from the upper Gatun Formation. Specimens from the lower Gatun Formation at UF locality YN020 confirm that the species ranges through the formation. Additional occurrences from Costa Rica and Colombia reported by Woodring (1970) require confirmation.


Description.—Maximum shell size: moderately large. While the largest complete specimen (UF 259876) from UF locality YN020 has SL 52.1mm and MD 28.4mm, an incomplete specimen (UF 259875) has MD 36.8mm, suggesting that it had an estimated SL 65–70mm. The lectotype has SL 65mm (Pflug, 1961). Last whorl.—Shape slightly pyriform (RD 0.61, x=0:61;


N=2); outline nearly flat to slightly sigmoidal. Protoconch unknown. Early postnuclear whorls unknown, but at least five of the teleoconch whorls of UF 190572 bear tubercles, which diminish thereafter (Fig. 11.4). Sutural ramp convex, with fine spiral treads. Subsutural flexure asymmetrical (ASSF 0.2–0.7, x=0:4, N=5), depth usually slightly greater than width (DWSSF 0.9–1.4, x=1:2, N=5) (Fig. 11.3, 11.4). Coloration pattern.—No observed specimens from UF localityYN020 show evidence of a preserved coloration pattern.


Materials.—NHMUK BM G83971 (lectotype of Conus recog- nitus Guppy, 1867); USNM 645736 (one specimen, figured by Woodring, 1970; Fig. 11.1); and an additional 18 observed specimens, all from UF locality YN020.


1970 Conus recognitus; Woodring, p. 346, pl. 55, fig. 4. 2009 Pyruconus recognitus (Guppy); Tucker and Tenorio, p. 117. 2015 Conus (Pyruconus) recognitus;Hendricks, p. 42, fig. 17a–d.


1961 Conus (Lithoconus) recognitus;Pflug, p. 59, pl. 18, figs. 12–15.


Lectotype.—NHMUK BM G83971, Yaque River, Dominican Republic, stratum unknown; designated by Pflug (1961).


Occurrence.—The exact type locality for the species is not known, but it is located somewhere in the Cibao Valley region of the northern Dominican Republic. In the Dominican


Remarks.—A thorough review of this species and its compli- cated nomenclatural history were provided by Woodring (1970; also seeWoodring, 1928), who reported only a single specimen (USNM 645736; Fig. 11.1) from the Gatun Formation of Panama (Woodring locality 182, which is located in the upper Gatun Formation). Intensive searching at UF locality YN020 resulted in the discovery of 18 additional specimens from the Gatun Formation, though all but two of these were fragmentary or otherwise poorly preserved. Interestingly, seven of the 18 specimens that were found at YN020 are preserved as calcitic casts (e.g., Fig. 11.6, 11.7), a much higher proportion than observed in other species from this locality. Why this mode of preservation was so much more common in C. recognitus than the other species found is unknown.


PMD 0.85–0.86, x=0:86;N=2); outline convex on posterior half, slightly concave on anterior third, resulting in a sigmoidal profile. Shoulder round; smooth. Widest part of shell below shoulder. Aperture uniform in width from base to shoulder. A slight siphonal notch may be present (Fig. 11.6), but confirmation of this requires more completely preserved specimens to be discovered. Spiral threads on anterior half, becoming obsolete towards shoulder. Spire whorls.—Spire low (RSH 0.09–0.10; x=0:10;


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207