search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
874


Journal of Paleontology 92(5):872–882


been formed as flat-lying, loose bioclastic sediments deposited on a shelf, generally below storm wave base. The crinoids reported here are from the widespread domi-


nant facies of the limestone, the Maerewhenua Member; this massive, little-cemented, light brown-yellow, bioclastic sand consists of fragments of mollusks, brachiopods, echinoderms, bryozoans, foraminiferans, and other invertebrates. (The Maerewhenua Member appears to be a senior synonym for the Meyers Pass Limestone Member of Eagle, 2007). Both the greensand and the limestone include notable


scattered shell beds. The highly friable limestone weathers easily, and fossils, most of which show little evidence of deformation or compaction, are easily extracted. Important fossils of marine vertebrates have been recovered from these units, including those of cetaceans (e.g., Fordyce and Marx, 2016), penguins (e.g., Ksepka et al., 2012), and fish (e.g., Gottfried et al., 2012). The units are also rich in marine macroinvertebrates, including bryozoans, corals, serpulids, brachiopods, mollusks, and echinoderms (see Eagle, 2007 for review), while common microfossils (foraminiferans and ostracods) provide excellent biostratigraphic constraints (Hornibrook et al., 1989; Ayress, 1993). According to microfossils and Sr/Sr dates, the Kokoamu Greensand and Otekaike Limestone span the local upper Whaingaroan, Duntroonian, and Waitakian stages, from low in the Chattian (27.82Ma to 23.03Ma) to possibly basal Aquitanian (23.03Ma to 20.44Ma).


Materials and methods


Repositories and institutional abbreviations.—Specimens described by Eagle (2007), all centrodorsals, collected at Ardlogie include AU19053-E868, AU19053-E869, GS11338.119–EC1162, GS11156.49-EC1163, GS11156.69- EC1164, GS11156.67-EC1165, GS11156.71-EC1166, and GS11156.18-EC1167, and at Haughs’ Quarry AU19054- E870A. A specimen (centrodorsal) collected at Haughs’ Quarry by A. Grebneff, OU44147; an intact specimen collected at ‘Waipati’ by R.E. Fordyce, OU46680. Four specimens of the type species of Cypelometra, Cypelometra iheringi (de Loriol, 1902): MACN4567—two specimens with same number collected at ‘Golfo San Jorge, Patagonia,’ one consisting of centrodorsal, the other of a centrodorsal and a radial ring; MACN4568 collected at ‘Bajo San Julian,’ consisting of a centrodorsal and a radial ring; MACN4569 collected at ‘Bajo San Julian,’ consisting of a centrodorsal and a radial ring. All specimens are housed in research collections inmuseums


in the following institutions: Department of Geology in the School of Geography, Geology andEnvironmental Science, University of Auckland,NZ(AU); Institute ofGeological andNuclearSciences, Lower Hutt, NZ (GS); Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia,’ Buenos Aires, ARG (MACN); Geology Museum, University of Otago, Dunedin, NZ (OU). Anatomical terms and abbreviations used follow Hess and


Messing (2011).


Systematic paleontology Class Crinoidea Miller, 1821 Subclass Articulata Zittel, 1879 Order Comatulida Clark, 1908


Superfamily Tropiometroidea Clark, 1908 Family Conometridae Gislén, 1924 Genus Rautangaroa new genus


Type species.—Cypelometra aotearoa Eagle, 2007, here designated by monotypy.


Included species.—Cypelometra aotearoa Eagle, 2007.


Diagnosis.—Genus of Conometridae with a large, pentastellate, truncated conical centrodorsal. Aboral pole large (40%–70%), flat to slightly concave cirrus-free rugose or granulated. Adoral


outline of centrodorsal deeply notched radially with triangular to blunt rectangular interradial projections. Subradial cleft present. Cirral sockets concave, moderately deep, and covered with radiating crenelae along the margins. Arms more than 20 divi- ded at primibrachial 2 (IBr2) and secundibrachial 2 (IIBr2); may divide further at tetribrachial 2 (IVBr2). Synarthries between brachials 1 and 2 of brachitaxes. Syzygies at IIIBr1–2 or IIIBr3– 4, and, when tetribrachials present, at IVBr1–2.


Etymology.—From the Māori words rau, meaning frond or feather, and tangaroa, meaning sea.


Occurrence.—Maerewhenua Member of the Otekaike Lime- stone, Oligocene: South Canterbury and North Otago, South Island, New Zealand.


Remarks.—The assignment of Rautangaroa to the Con- ometridae is based on the size and shape of its centrodorsal and the arrangement, size, and shape of its cirrus sockets. Its truncated conical centrodorsal with a flattened aboral apex, absence of a dorsal star, cirrus sockets arranged in 10 more or less distinct vertical columns of two to four sockets, separated by a naked space in the radii, a narrow centrodorsal cavity, concealed basals, and visible dorsal, free surface of radials are all traits found in Conometridae (Hess and Messing, 2011). Among the Conometridae, Rautangaroa most closely


resembles Cypelometra, but a detailed analysis of the type species of Cypelometra, C. iheringi (de Loriol, 1902), reveals significant differences. Gislén (1924) established the genus Cypelometra with


Antedon iheringi de Loriol, 1902 as the type species. In the original description, de Loriol relied on six specimens collected in Patagonia by C. Ameghino (Ameghino, 1906, p. 171) that had been sent to him by Ihering (de Loriol, 1902, p. 3, 23). de Loriol’s description included drawings of two specimens (de Loriol, 1902, figs. 3, 4). Until Eagle’s 2007 publication, C. iheringi (de Loriol, 1902) remained the only species of the genus, and specimens mentioned by de Loriol (1902) were the only ones reported in the literature. It is highly unlikely that subsequent to de Loriol’s 1902 publication, specimens of C. iheringi (de Loriol, 1902) had been reexamined since de Loriol did not specify where the types were deposited, and all subsequent authors relied solely on de Loriol’s descriptions, often republishing his figures. One of the original illustrations (de Loriol, 1902, fig. 3a)


shows deep radial pits or impressions on the adoral side of the centrodorsal. Surprisingly, this striking feature is not mentioned


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207