search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
754


Journal of Paleontology 92(5):751–767 Type species.—Lingula davisii M’Coy, 1851.


Diagnosis.—Sutton et al. (2000) redescribed the type species, and we follow their concept of the genus.


Lingulella? sp. Figure 3.1–3.5


Occurrence.—In sample LR-1465.5, 5.5 ft (1.7 m) above the base of the Tanyard Formation, in the Cordylodus angulatus conodont Zone.


Description.—Ventral valve suboval, laterally elongated with sharply acuminate posterior margin. Larval shell round in out- line, prominent, ~250 μm in width. Pseudointerarea with wide, shallow, subtriangular pedicle groove. Anterior margin of pedicle groove strongly concave in outline (Fig. 3.2, 3.5). Flexure lines faint (Fig. 3.3). Dorsal valve not known.


Materials.—Five ventral valves, all fragmental (Supplemental Data Table 2), including illustrated ventral valves NPL 45434 and NPL 45435.


Remarks.—The material is tentatively assigned to the genus Lingulella because internal pitting, a character of the type species, is not seen, although the collection is of poorly preserved juveniles and small fragments of larger valves on which the pitting is unlikely to be preserved.


Stittia Freeman and Miller, 2011b Type species.—Stittia ornata Freeman and Miller, 2011b.


Diagnosis.—As in Freeman and Miller (2011b). Stittia ornata Freeman and Miller, 2011b Figure 3.6–3.8


2011a Genus and species indeterminate, Freeman and Miller, p. 698, figs. 1, 2.


2011b Stittia ornata Freeman and Miller, p. 45, fig. 4F–4P.


Holotype.—Ventral valve (USNM 542983) from the upper Cambrian Hellnmaria Member of the Notch Peak Formation, western Utah (Freeman and Miller, 2011b, fig. 4M, 4N).


Diagnosis.—As in Freeman and Miller (2011b).


Occurrence.—In the Saukia trilobite Zone and the Proconodontus tenuiserratus and Proconodontus posterocostatus conodont zones, in the Point Peak Member and San Saba Member of theWilberns Formation. In the same conodont zones in the Hellnmaria Member of the Notch Peak Formation, Utah (Freeman and Miller, 2011b). Possiblyinthe Eoconodontus notchpeakensis and lowest Cambrooistodus minutus conodont Subzones and the Prosaukia serotina Subzone of the Saukia trilobite Zone in the San Saba Member of the Wilberns Formation.


Description.—Larval shells 700–800 μmwide, as reconstructed from a fragment (Fig. 3.6). Larval shell with faint radial


Materials.—One dorsal valve fragment (NPL 45442) and 10 fragments unidentifiable to valve (Supplemental Data Table 1), including illustrated specimen NPL 45443.


Remarks.—The species is identified from comminuted shell fragments, some preserving parts of the smooth larval shell and characteristic postlarval ornament of transverse ridges spaced ~200 μm apart (Fig. 3.15), as well as from one dorsal valve fragment with the characteristic elongated dorsal median groove (Fig. 3.13).


Family Zhanatellidae Koneva, 1986 Genus Wahwahlingula Popov, Holmer, and Miller, 2002


ornamentation and strong growth lines. Postlarval ornamenta- tion of transverse terrace-like ridges, asymmetrical in lateral profile (Fig. 3.6, 3.7). Ridges cross growth lines and may trun- cate against the posterior lateral margins of larval shell. Ridges spaced 50–60 μm apart.


Materials.—Four dorsal valves and one ventral valve, all fragmental, and numerous small fragments (Supplemental Data Table 1), including illustrated dorsal valves fragments NPL 45436, and ventral valve fragment 45438.


Remarks.—Despite the fragmental nature of this material, diagnostic characteristics can be seen in the smooth larval shell and transverse postlarval ornament. Transverse grooves in the dorsal pseudointerarea are another diagnostic characteristic of the genus. This feature is present on fragments not identified to species due to lack of preserved ornament. The material differs slightly from Utah material assigned to Stittia ornata (Freeman and Miller, 2011b) in the spacing of the transverse ornament. On these specimens, it is spaced at 50–60 μm apart on neanic (juvenile) growth, but it is spaced 40–55 μm on Utah material. Well-preserved specimens of the species are rare in both loca- tions, and differences in ornament may be variable among individuals. The spacing of the transverse ornament distin- guishes the species from Stittia cf. S. notchensis (Walcott, 1908), on which transverse ridges are spaced 100–200 μm apart on neanic growth.


Stittia cf.S. notchensis (Walcott, 1908) Figure 3.10–3.14


1908 Obolus (Westonia) notchensis Walcott, p. 69, fig. 13.


1912 Obolus (Westonia) notchensis Walcott; Walcott, p. 463, pl. 63, fig. 9.


2011b Stittia cf. notchensis (Walcott); Freeman and Miller, p. 46, fig. 4A–4E.


Holotype.—Ventral valve (USNM 51731a) from the Notch Peak Formation, western Utah (Walcott, 1908, pl. 7, fig. 13).


Occurrence.—In the Eoconodontus notchpeakensis and Cambrooistodus minutus conodont zones and the Prosaukia serotina Subzone of the Saukia trilobite Zone, in the San Saba Member of the Wilberns Formation.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207