search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
918


Journal of Paleontology 92(5):911–919 As in other cavioid rodents, the configuration of the


ectal, sustentacular, and cuboid facets of the calcaneus indicates relatively high stabilization of the foot, restricting mediolateral movements and emphasizing flexion-extension. Likewise, the calcaneocuboid joint is more distally located with respect to the astragalonavicular joint, further restricting mediolateral move- ments (Candela and Picasso, 2008; Candela et al., 2017). According to García-Esponda and Candela (2016), the


hind limb of the capybara differs from that of other semiaquatic rodents (see Samuels and Van Valkenburgh, 2008) in exhibiting a lower pes index, which could be related with an increment of the out-force generated by the foot during swimming. Cardiomys displays relatively longer and slenderer ectocunei- form, metatarsal III, and phalanges with respect to those of Hydrochoerus (Fig. 4). These features indicate that Cardiomys would have had a longer and more gracile foot than extant capybaras. Therefore, the pes of Cardiomys would not have reached the degree of swimming specialization exhibited by Hydrochoerus. In turn, Cardiomyswould have had a shorter foot with respect to the cursorially adapted Dolichotis and Dasyprocta.Thisfeature suggests that running adaptations were absent in Cardiomys. In summary, in the context of the Cavioidea, the postcranial


features of Cardiomys are interpreted neither as adaptations to highly specialized cursoriality, such as those of Dolichotis (Candela and Picasso, 2008; García-Esponda and Candela, 2010), nor as specializations to an aquatic mode of life. Cardiomys exhibits several features shared with other cavioids that allow us to consider it as a generalized ambulatory species. Considering the morphology and relative size of the pes of


the extinct hydrochoerines Cardiomys and Phugatherium Ameghino, 1887 (= Protohydrochoerus Rovereto, 1914, a large cursorial hydrochoerine from the late Miocene–early Pliocene of Argentina; Kraglievich, 1940), the shortening of the pes appears to be an acquisition of the more recent genus Hydrochoerus. Therefore, the origin of a semiaquatic lifestyle in capybaras is likely a recent (Pleistocene) adaptation in the context of the evolutionary history of Hydrochoerinae. Thus, we hypothesize that the morphology of Cardiomys represents an ancestral postcranial pattern of hydrochoerines.


Conclusions and final remarks


Features of Cardiomys are more similar to Hydrochoerus than to any other Cavioidea, which seems to be compatible with the phylogenetic information provided by dental and cranial data (e.g., Pérez et al., 2017b). Our results indicate that Cardiomys can be considered an ambulatory rodent. Like the dental struc- ture, the postcranial features of these rodents show a more generalized morphology than extant capybaras. As recently proposed by García-Esponda and Candela (2016), adaptations to semiaquatic habits would have occurred more recently in the evolution of the Hydrochoerus lineage.


Acknowledgments


We gratefully thank M. Reguero (MLP), P. Teta (MACN), D. Voglino (MPS-Z), I. Olivares (MLP), D. Verzi (MLP), U. Pardiñas (CNP), D. Romero (MMPMa), E. Westwig (AMNH), and K. Zyskowski (YPM) for access to collections


under their care. Special thanks to the reviewers C.M. Deschamps and J.X. Samuels for their valuable suggestions and comments, which improve an earlier version of our manuscript.


Accessibility of supplemental data


Data available from the Dryad Digital Repository: http://doi. org/10.5061/dryad.f8h7h.


References Abello, M.A., and Candela, A.M., 2010, Postcranial skeleton of the Miocene marsupial Palaeothentes (Paucituberculata, Palaeothentidae): Paleobiology and phylogeny: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 30, p. 1515–1527.


Ameghino, F., 1885, Nuevos restos de mamíferos fósiles oligocenos recogidos por el profesor Pedro Scalabrini y pertenecientes al Museo Provincial de la Ciudad del Paraná: Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias en Córdoba, v. 8, p. 5–207.


Ameghino, F., 1887, Apuntes preliminares sobre algunos mamíferos extingui- dos del yacimiento de Monte Hermoso existentes en el “Museo La Plata”: Buenos Aires, Imprenta E Censor, 20 p.


Ameghino, F., 1888, Lista de las especies de mamíferos fósiles del Miocene superior de Monte-Hermoso, hasta ahora conocidas: Buenoa Aires, P.E. Coni, 21 p.


Anaya, F., and MacFadden, B.J., 1995, Pliocene mammals from Inchasi, Bolivia: The endemic fauna just before the Great American Interchange: Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History, v. 39, p. 87–140.


Argot, C., 2001, Functional-adaptive anatomy of the forelimb in the Didelphi- dae, and the paleobiology of the Paleocene marsupials Mayulestes ferox and Pucadelphys andinus: Journal of Morphology, v. 247, p. 51–79.


Bowditch, T.E., 1821, An Analysis of the Natural Classifications of Mammalia for the Use of Students and Travelers: Paris, J. Smith, 115 p.


Brandt, J., 1855, Beitrage zur nahern Kenntniss der Saugethiere Russland’s: Mémoires de l’Académie impériale des sciences de St. Pétersbourg Serie 6 - Sciences Naturelles, v. 7, p. 1–365.


Brisson, M.J., 1762, Le regnum animale in classes IX distributum, sive synopsis methodica sistens generalem animalium distributionem in classes IX, & duarum primarum classium, quadrupedum scilicet & cetaceorum, particu- larem dibvisionem in ordines, sectiones, genera & species: Paris, T. Haak, 296 p.


Candela, A.M., and Picasso, M.B., 2008, Functional anatomy of the limbs of Erethizontidae (Rodentia, Caviomorpha): Indicators of locomotor behavior in Miocene porcupines: Journal of Morphology., v. 269, p. 552–593.


Candela, A.M., Muñoz, N.A., and García-Esponda, C.M., 2017, The tarsal- metatarsal complex of caviomorph rodents: Anatomy and functional- adaptive analysis: Journal of Morphology, v. 278, p. 828–847.


Cione, A.L., and Tonni, E.P., 2005, Bioestratigrafía basada en mamíferos del Cenozoico superior de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina, in Barrio, R., Etcheverry, R., Caballé, M., and Llambías, E., eds., Geología y Recursos Minerales de la Provincia de Buenos Aires: La Plata, Relatorio del XVI Congreso Geológico Argentino, v. 11, p. 183–200.


Desmarest, A.G., 1820, 1822, Mammalogie ou description des espèce de mammifères. Encyclopèdie Méthodique: Paris, Agasse, 555 p.


Drapeau, M.S.M., 2004, Functional anatomy of the olecranon process in homi- noids and Plio-Pleistocene hominins: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, v. 124, p. 297–314.


Fischer von Waldheim, G., 1817, Adversaria zoologica: Mémoires de la Société impériale des naturalistes de Moscou, v. 5, p. 357–446.


Fujiwara, S., 2009, Olecranon orientation as an indicator of elbow joint angle in the stance phase, and estimation of forelimb posture in extinct quadruped animals: Journal of Morphology, v. 270, p. 1107–1121.


García-Esponda, C.M., and Candela, A.M., 2010, Anatomy of the hindlimb musculature in the cursorial caviomorph Dasyprocta azarae Lichtenstein, 1823 (Rodentia, Dasyproctidae): Functional and evolutionary significance: Mammalia, v. 74, p. 407.


García-Esponda, C.M., and Candela, A.M., 2016, Hindlimb musculature of the largest living rodent Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris (Caviomorpha): Adapta- tions to semiaquatic and terrestrial styles of life: Journal of Morphology, v. 277, p. 286–305.


Gill, T., 1872, Arrangement of the families of mammals with analytical tables: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, v. 11, p. 1–98.


Goloboff, P.A., and Catalano, S.A., 2016, TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics: Cladistics, v. 32, p. 221–238.


Goloboff, P.A., Mattoni, C.I., and Quinteros, A.S., 2006, Continuous characters analyzed as such: Cladistics, v. 22, p. 589–601.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207