López-Torres and Silcox—European Paromomyidae
1 Presence of posterocone on I1 (ordered) 2 Relative height anterocone/mediocone on I1
Table 3. Descriptions of dental characters. Upper incisors
0: Anterocone taller than mediocone; 1: Mediocone taller than anterocone 0: Absent; 1: Present 3 Presence of P2 Upper premolars
4 Presence of metacone on P4 5 Presence of a molariform P4
6 Presence of precingulum on P4 7 Presence of parastyle on P4 8 Shape of P4 (ordered)
0: Absent; 1: Present 0: Absent; 1: Present
0: P4 with a metacone significantly smaller than the paracone and no expanded distolingual basin; 1: P4 with a metacone approaching in size to the paracone and an expanded distolingual basin 0: Absent; 1: Present 0: Absent; 1: Present
9 Mesial parastylar expansion on P4 10 Acuteness of P4 cusps
0: T-shaped; 1: Triangular; 2: Quadrangular
12 Depth of distolingual basin on M1-2 13 Presence of conules on M1-2 (ordered) 14 Parastylar expansion on M1-2 15 Outline of M1
11 Height of postprotocingulum on P4 Upper molars
16 Depth of trigon basin on M1-2 Lower canine
19 Presence of C1 Lower premolars
20 Presence of P2 21 Presence of P3
22 Trigonid/talonid width proportion on P4 23 P4/M1 width proportion
27 Relative mesiodistal length of P4 to M1 28 Morphology of the hypoflexid
29 Presence of paracristid
25 Presence of a mesial bulge in the base of the P4 protoconid 0: Absent; 1: Present 26 P4/M1 area proportion
24 Width at the base of the P4 protoconid
31 Presence of a crest connecting the protoconid and the hypoflexid fold (prehypoflexid cristid)
Lower molars 32 Length of trigonid
34 Presence of distal cingulid on M1 andM2 35 Presence of hypoconulid on M1 andM2
33 Shape of the protocristid on M1
36 Presence of buccal cingulid on M1 andM2 trigonids 37 Presence of buccal cingulid on M1 andM2 talonids 38 Shape of the M1 trigonid basin
41 Relative height of the protoconid compared to the metaconid on M1
entoconid on M1 42 Presence of paraconid on M2
43 Distinctiveness of theM2 paraconid relative to theM1 paraconid
44 Relative height of the paraconid compared to the metaconid on M2
45 Relative height of the hypoconid compared to the entoconid on M2
47 Acuteness of cusps
48 Molar enamel roughness inside the basin of M3 49 Presence of M3 paraconid
0: Trigonids become less mesiodistally compressed fromM1 to M3, or there is no change; 1: Trigonids become more mesiodistally compressed fromM1 to M3
0: V-shaped; 1: Slightly concave 0: Absent; 1: Present 0: Absent; 1: Present 0: Absent; 1: Present 0: Absent; 1: Present
39 Mesial inflection of theM1 andM2 trigonids (ordered) 0: Absent/weak; 1: Somewhat pronounced; 2: Very pronounced 40 Relative height of the hypoconid compared to the
0: Semicircular; 1: Squared; 2: Triangular
0: Hypoconid taller than entoconid; 1: Subequal; 2: Entoconid taller than hypoconid 0: Protoconid taller than metaconid; 1: Subequal; 2: Metaconid taller than protoconid 0: Absent; 1: Present
46 Relative height of the protoconid compared to the metaconid on M2
51 Relative height of the protoconid compared to the metaconid on M3
50 Relative height of the hypoconid compared to the entoconid on M3
52 M3 trigonid basin area 53 Morphology of theM3 hypoconulid lobe
0: Comparably distinct to theM1 paraconid; 1: Less distinct than theM1 paraconid 0: Paraconid lower than metaconid; 1: Paraconid subequal of taller than metaconid 0: Hypoconid taller than entoconid; 1: Subequal; 2: Entoconid taller than hypoconid 0: Protoconid taller than metaconid; 1: Subequal; 2: Metaconid taller than protoconid 0: Relatively acute; 1: Blunter
0: Smooth; 1: Crenulated 0: Absent; 1: Present
0: Hypoconid taller than entoconid; 1: Subequal; 2: Entoconid taller than hypoconid 0: Protoconid taller than metaconid; 1: Subequal; 2: Metaconid taller than protoconid 0: Small basin, straight at the front; 1: Expansive trigonid basin, curved at the front
30 Relative length of the talonid compared to the length of the tooth
0: Relatively short talonid (less than 26% of the tooth length); 1: Relatively long talonid (more than 26% of the tooth length) 0: Absent; 1: Present
0: Present; 1: Absent 0: Present; 1: Absent
0: Present; 1: Absent 0: Present; 1: Absent
0: Talonid as wide as or wider than trigonid; 1: Talonid narrower than trigonid 0: P4 narrower thanM1;1:P4 of approximately the same with as M1
0: P4 shorter thanM1;1:P4 equal or longer thanM1 0: Distinct, deep; 1: Not distinct, shallow
0: Narrowly based protoconid; 1: Broadly based protoconid 0: Small P4 area compared to M1 area; 1: Similar
17 Presence of postmetaconule crista on M1-2 18 Expansion of mesiolabial corner on M3
0: Projecting beyond the mesial border; 1: Not projecting. 0: Acute; 1: Bulbous
0: Low (crest dips closer to the roots); 1: High (crest stays near the tip of the protocone in height) 0: Shallow; 1: Deep
0: Both conules present; 1: Metaconules absent; 2: Both conules absent 0: No expansion; 2: Expanded
0: Squared; 1: Rectangular and narrow 0: Shallow; 1: Deep 0: Absent; 1: Present
0: Not expanded, buccal border is straight; 1: Expanded
931
0: From a distal view, the central occlusal surface is taller than the sides; 1: from a distal view, the medial and later edges are taller than the central occlusal surface
Results of the phylogenetic analysis.—In the tree from Analysis 1, Arcius is found to be monophyletic, with A. fuscus and A. lapparenti forming a clade. Arcius rougieri appears as the sister
group to the A. fuscus-A. lapparenti clade. Arcius zbyszewskii is placed as the most basal European paromomyid, which agrees with the inference by Estravís (2000) that A. zbyszewskii is a
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207