search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Baumiller and Fordyce—New genus of feather star from Oligocene of New Zealand


in subsequent publications, including in the one by Gislén (1924) that established the genus Cypelometra with Antedon iheringi de Loriol, 1902 as the type species. We located four specimens of C. iheringi (de Loriol, 1902) in the collections of Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivada- via,’ Buenos Aires (MACN, catalog numbers 4567 [two speci- mens, herein referred to as ‘A’ and ‘B’], 4568, and 4569) collected from the same Patagonian localities as those described by de Loriol (1902). Of these four, only one specimen (MACN 4567 ‘A’) lacks radials, thus exposing the adoral surface of the centrodorsal. MACN 4567 ‘A’ has five cavernous radial pits or impressions, which are separated from each other by tall, narrow ridges that extend interradially from the thin, external wall of the centrodorsal to a small, relatively deep central cavity, as in the specimen figured by de Loriol (1902, fig. 3a). Deep radial pits separated by interradial ridges have been noted in several other feather stars, including Notocrinus (Messing, 2003, fig. 3a), Microcrinus (Ciampaglio and Weaver, 2004, fig. 2b), and Jaekelometra (Messing, 2003, fig. 3b), yet in details they all differ substantially from each other. The presence of deep radial pits in the type species of Cypelometra clearly distinguishes this taxon from the New Zealand specimens whose adoral surface


is “circular, smooth, concave, with five long, wide, convex- floored, smooth, raised margins above reduced V-shaped radial surface” (Eagle, 2007, p. 95–96, fig. 12). Although similar in size, the shapes of the centrodorsals are


875


crenelae. Axial canal at center of each socket; oval to slightly bilobate. Peripherally, one to three sockets may converge interradially forming weak to moderate ridge where socket margins touch or overlap. Dorsal star lacking. In profile, interradial corners very prominent with deep


incision of adoral edge of centrodorsal below radials. Adoral outline of centrodorsal pentastellate, with deep


interradial notches and triangular to blunt rectangular interradial projections. Adoral surface slightly concave, with five distinct near-rectangular furrows (~0.6mm long and ~0.1mm wide); furrows slightly narrower where they open into central cavity and taper slightly at interradial corner. No radial pits. Centrodorsal cavity about one-third of centrodorsal diameter. Skeletal elements other than the centrodorsal known with


certainty only from the single intact Waipati specimen of R. aotearoa n. comb., which was examined with a binocular microscope as well as micro-CT; many individual elements free of the matrix were studied with SEM (Fig. 3, Supplemental Data 1, 2, 3). In this specimen, basals are not visible. The radials are short, smooth, with the free surface visible only as an extremely narrow band beyond the centrodorsal margin, though more exposed in interradial angles where radials meet above the basals; their distal margin is concave (Fig. 4.2, 4.4). Subradial cleft is present. No radial articular facets are exposed. All arms are divided at primibrachial 2, secundibrachial 2;


also distinctly different: in profile, those of C. iheringi (de Loriol, 1902) are hemispherical, whereas in the New Zealand specimens they are truncated conical, with a large flat to slightly concave aboral pole. In adoral view, the latter is deeply notched radially, with triangular to blunt rectangular interradial projec- tions, whereas the radial margin of C. iheringi (de Loriol, 1902) is gently curved. Cirrus sockets of C. iheringi (de Loriol, 1902) have smooth margins, whereas in the New Zealand specimens, margins are crenulated.


Rautangaroa aotearoa (Eagle, 2007) Figures 2–5


2007 Cypelometra aotearoa; Eagle, p. 94, figs. 10–12.


Types.—Holotype AU19053 (E868), Ardlogie, South Canterbury, New Zealand.


Paratypes.—Ardlogie, South Canterbury, New Zealand: AK7331, GS 11338, AU19053 (E869), AK73312, GS11156.49, GS11156.69, GS11156.67, GS11156.71, GS11156.18; Haughs’ Quarry, South Canterbury, New Zealand: AU 19054 (E870). Type locality: Otekaike Limestone, Ardlogie, South Canterbury, New Zealand.


Occurrence.—As for generic occurrence.


Description.—Centrodorsal large, truncated conical; maximum diameter ~1 cm. Aboral pole flat to slightly concave, cirrus-free, and rugose or granulated, occupying ~50% of basal diameter (Fig. 2). Cirri arranged in 10 more or less distinct vertical columns of two to four sockets, separated by naked midradial space; sockets concave, moderately deep, and bordered with radiating


a single articulated tertibrachial 2 indicates that there were at least 21 free arms. In first and second division series, Br1–2 synarthrial. Brachitaxes aborally convex, with weak midaboral synarthrial swellings. Brachials smooth, wider than high (Figs. 3, 4).


IBr1 short, proximal margin U-shaped, distal margin nearly


straight, taller radially than interradially with straight lateral margins; ratio of width to length ~2.5. IBr1–2 synarthrial. IBr2ax pentagonal with short diverging lateral margins, width- to-length ratio ~1.4–1.6 (Fig 4.4). IIBr1 with slightly U-shaped proximal and distal margins


and subequal, slightly diverging lateral margins touching interiorly, width-to-length ratio ~2.0. IIBr1–2 synarthrial. IIBr2ax pentagonal with short diverging lateral margins, width-to-length ratio ~1.3–1.6 (Fig. 4.2). IIIBr1 rhomboid, lateral margins touching interiorly,


width-to-length ratio ~1.9–2.3. IIIBr1–2 muscular, syzygial, or rarely synarthrial. Shape of IIIBr2 variable: when IIIBr1–2 muscular, IIIBr2 width-to-length ratio ~1.7-2.0; when IIIBr1–2 syzygial, IIIBr2 width-to-length ratio ~3.5; when IIIBr1–2 synarthrial, IIBr2 width-to-length ratio ~1.7 (Fig. 4.3). Syzygies at IIIBr1–2 (6/10) or IIIBr3–4 (4/10) and, where


tetribrachials present, at IVBr1–2. Remaining undivided arms with no additional syzygies, none complete, the longest consisting of 21 tetribrachials. Cirri XXVIII to ~XXXI, moderately stout; smooth; largest


intact cirrus of seven cirrals (16mm long), but 553 cirrals recovered from the matrix suggest cirri may consist of ~20 cirrals and be ~40–50mm long. Proximal cirrals cylindrical and stout: first cirral (c1) short (0.8 mm); following cirrals increasing in length to c7 (2.3mm); length-to-width ratio of first seven cirrals increases from ~0.5 to 2.2; longest cirrals (probably c8– c9) ~3.2mm long and 1.4mm wide (length-to-width ratio= 2.3); following four cirrals gradually shorter and slightly


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207