search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Benedetto—The strophomenide brachiopod Ahtiella in Gondwana


confirmed the taxic metrics as an adequate proxy for assessing morphological disparity (Erwin, 2007, p. 59). If, as evidence presented here suggests, Ahtiella originated from Monorthis through a series of minor transformations, then the impressive morphological gap among ‘typical’ orthides and strophome- nides was bridged through a brief cladogenetic event. At first, such a transition indicates that there is not a definite dis- continuity between species-level evolution (processes that occur within a species or lead to a newspecies) and the origin of higher taxa (macroevolution). Central to this statement is the assumption that higher taxa are evolutionary entities char- acterized by a significant morphological disparity achieved over a long period of time, then the greater the time elapsed since their origin from a common ancestor, the larger morphological disparity. In the present case study, it would be expected that the highly plesiomorphic basal forms (i.e., ahtiellins) of a given higher taxon (i.e., strophomenides) are more similar to their putative ancestors (i.e., hesperonomiids) than they are to the more derived (apomorphic) end-members of the same clade (i.e., sowerbyellids, aegiromenids). In other words, morpholo- gical discontinuity becomes minimal at a point closer to the initial divergence of two phylogenetically related higher taxa.A consequence of this is that assignation of basal forms to one or another higher taxon can be difficult in the lack of a well- supported phylogeny. The need of a ‘shoehorn’ to classify such earliest members of a given higher taxon into a specified order or suborder has also been noted in other groups of marine benthic organisms. For instance, the clade Bivalvia includes a number of early representatives of Tremadocian-Floian age that lack certain apomorphies defining more derived crown groups. In this respect, it has been suggested that such basal taxa can be classified as plesions, i.e., paraphyletic groups having a number of symplesiomorphic traits but morphologically close to a given higher taxon (Fang and Sánchez, 2012). In the case of bra- chiopods, as Carlson (2016, p. 421) stated, numerous higher taxa had been thought to represent grade-level taxa, i.e., not clades, and our evidence indicates that this could be the case of strophomenides.


Materials and methods


Repository and institutional abbreviations.—CEGH-UNC, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra CONICET and Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina; CORD-PZ, Museo de Paleontologia, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina; MGM, Museo Geominero, Madrid, Spain.


Systematic paleontology


The systematic classification follows that of the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology (Cocks and Rong, 2000). Following Congreve et al. (2015), the genus Ahtiella is referred to the ‘Plectambonitoidea’ with the quotation marks denoting that the superfamily is paraphyletic (Wiley, 1979).


Order Strophomenida Öpik, 1934


Superfamily ‘Plectambonitoidea’ Jones, 1928 Family Taffiidae Schuchert and Cooper, 1931 Subfamily Ahtiellinae Öpik, 1933


781


Figure 8. Phylogenetic relationships of taxa analyzed calibrated to chronostratigraphic scale. Apomorphies defining numbered nodes are discussed in the text.


Genus Ahtiella Öpik, 1932


Type species.—Ahtiella lirata Öpik, 1932 from the Darriwilian (Middle Ordovician) of Tsitri, Estonia, by original designation.


Diagnosis (emended).—Shell resupinate, variably geniculate; ornamentation subequally multicostellate, ramicostellate or parvicostellate, often with posterolateral rugae. Dental plates widely spaced converging to valve floor, enclosing posteriorly subtriangular to subquadrate ventral muscle field. Interior of ventral valve with thickened margin defining disc and trail. Cardinal process simple. Dorsal median ridge broad, rounded. Dorsal platform variably developed. Saccate mantle canal system usually strongly impressed either along shell margin or whole interior.


Ahtiella argentina Benedetto and Herrera, 1986 Figure 9.1–9.23


1986 Ahtiella argentina Benedetto and Herrera, p. 114, pl. 1, figs. 4−21.


2002 Ahtiella argentina; Benedetto, p. 114, pl. 2, figs. 20, 21. 2003a Ahtiella argentina; Benedetto, p. 201, pl. 9, figs. 9–12. 2009 Ahtiella argentina; Benedetto et al., fig. 9f.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207