search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Benedetto—The strophomenide brachiopod Ahtiella in Gondwana


Famatina Range provides an invaluable frame to establish well- resolved phylogenies based on the fossil record. In this paper, evidence is presented suggesting that Ahtiella originated from the hesperonomiid orthoid Monorthis transversa Benedetto, 2003b, which always occurs in strata below those bearing Ahtiella famatiniana new species (described herein). A general trend of morphological change through time emerges from the compara- tive morphology of Ahtiella species and its putative ancestor Monorthis. Relevant for our phylogenetic hypothesis is the fact that the earliest species of Ahtiella recorded in Gondwana exhibit transitional characteristics between Monorthis and the typical Ahtiella species from younger strata of Cuyania and Baltica. Finally, a phylogenetic analysis is presented herein to investigate the evolutionary relationships among the Gondwanan species of Ahtiella and those from Cuyania, Baltica, and Avalonia.


Stratigraphic provenance and age


The early Paleozoic geodynamic history of southern South America involved three main sedimentary domains (Fig. 1), which were inhabited at different times by species of Ahtiella. They are: (1) the autochthonous Central Andean Basin devel- oped around the Brazilian craton through Peru, Bolivia, and northwestern Argentina; (2) the volcanosedimentary Famatina Basin, which together with the Puna volcanic arc developed peripheral to the active pre-Andean Gondwana margin; and (3) the Precordillera Basin developed on the Laurentian-derived Cuyania terrane, which accreted to Gondwana during the early Paleozoic (for a comprehensive review of the Ordovician basins of Argentina, see Astini, 2003).


Central Andean Basin.—The southern part of the large Central Andean Basin is widely exposed in the Cordillera Oriental of northwestern Argentina, where the uppermost Cambrian to Lower Ordovician siliciclastic succession of the Santa Victoria Group attains 3,800m in thickness. In the study area of Los Colorados (Fig. 2), it is overlain by a succession of reddish purple sandstones named the Alto del Cóndor Formation, which is succeeded by fossiliferous greenish mudstones and marls. This interval, which was referred to as the ‘Green Member of the Sepulturas Formation’ by Astini (1994) and as the Sepulturas Formation by Astini et al. (2004a), is well exposed at Quebrada Chamarra and Quebrada del Cardonal (Fig. 2). Brachiopods consist of Monorthis coloradoensis (reassigned herein to Ahtiella) and rare specimens of Paralenorthis sp., Dinorthis? sp., and small dalmanellids. Trilobites are represented by Neseuretus sp., a trinucleid of the Anebolithus-Incaia group (personal communication, B.G. Waisfeld, 2017), and a new species of Hoekaspis, the latter recorded elsewhere in the Sub- andean Ranges of northwestern Argentina from beds not older than the upper Darriwilian (Waisfeld and Vaccari, 2003). Albanesi and Astini (2002) reported from interbedded carbonate-rich layers a conodont assemblage consisting of Erraticodon, Erismodus, and Plectodina, as well as micro- remains of the agnathan Sacabambaspis considered of late Darriwilian age.


Famatina Basin.—The Famatina Range is characterized by a thick succession of sedimentary and volcanosedimentary rocks


769


Figure 1. Map of central-western South America showing the main Ordovician sedimentary basins discussed in the text (gray shading).


deposited in a retroarc basin almost synchronously with the emplacement of crust-derived magmatism along the proto- Andean margin (Pankhurst et al., 2001; Dahlquist et al., 2005). Marine intervals are well exposed to the north of the basin in the Chaschuil area (Catamarca Province), and to the south in the Cachiyuyo-Saladillo rivers area (La Rioja Province) (Fig. 3). In the Chaschuil area, a regressive volcanosedimentary sequence acummulated on a high-gradient narrow platform flanking the volcanic chain (Mángano and Buatois, 1996, 1997). Its lower part, ~ 150m thick, was referred to the Loma del Kilómetro Member of the Suri Formation; it has been interpreted as deposited in a storm- and mass flow-dominated shelf, whereas the upper Punta Pétrea Member is a coarse-grained volcani- clastic wedge that records the progradation of a fan delta system onto the shelf sediments. The Dapingian age of the Loma del Kilómetro Member, containing Monorthis transversa (dis- cussed below) and other brachiopods (Benedetto, 1994), is based on conodonts of the Baltoniodus navis Biozone (Albanesi and Vaccari, 1994) and the Baltoniodus triangularis Biozone


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207