Zhao et al.—New Jurassic Nilssoniopteris species from Xinjiang of China
Remarks.—The morphogenus Nilssoniopteris was established by Nathorst (1909) to accommodate European Jurassic cyca- dophyte leaves with an entire margin, without designating a type species (but assigned only one species, N. tenuinervis, to the newly erected genus). Soon afterwards, Thomas and Bancroft (1913) suggested that this generic name should be abandoned. Later, Harris (1932a) recognized the need for establishing a genus of Taeniopteris-type leaves with bennettitalean cuticle features and proposed the new name Taeniozamites. However, Florin (1933a) noted that the genus Nilssoniopteris should be restored with precedence over Taenizamites. Harris (1937) endorsed this view, and in his 1969 paper (Harris, 1969) gave the first diagnosis of Nilssoniopteris based on the original description of Nathorst (1909). Watson and Sincock (1992) slightly emended the diagnosis by adding the strap leaf shape. Boyd (2000) expanded the range of leaf forms to include lobed leaves, while Pott et al. (2007) further emended the diagnosis to include leaves that are completely dissected down to the rachis. In addition, after reviewing the macro- and micro- morphological features of the mid-Mesozoic Laurasian bennet- titalean leaf morphogenera, Pott and Mcloughlin (2009) further specified the lamina of Nilssoniopteris to be of four types: (1) entire margined; (2) having incompletely segmented (or “dissected”) lobes in the middle, but with basal and/or apical portions entire-margined; (3) having a completely but irregu- larly segmented middle portion, but with apical and/or basal portions entire-margined; and (4) having a (completely) and regularly segmented middle portion, but with apical and/or basal portions entire-margined. To summarize, the middle portion of the lamina of Nilssoniopteris can be of almost any shape that a bennetitalean lamina may have (from entire-margined, to incompletely dissected/lobed, completely and irregularly segmented, as well as completely and regularly segmented), as long as at least the apical and/or basal portions are entire- margined. Bennetitalean leaves with other shapes, particularly those whose whole blades are regularly segmented, were assigned by the authors to Anomozamites or Pterophyllum, which can be further separated by whether or not the leaflets (or lobes/segments) are up to two times as long as broad and whe- ther the leaves are impari-pinnate or pari-pinnate. As all of our present specimens are entire-margined and readily assignable to Nilssoniopteris, therefore we tentatively simply follow the diagnosis of Pott et al. (2007) and Pott and Mcloughlin (2009) to which we add the emendation, particularly of venation pattern.
527 In previous diagnoses, the veins of Nilssoniopteris were
noted as being free, simple or forked, ending at the margin. Accordingly, when Zhou (1978) described several taeniopter- ioid laminae from the Upper Triassic of Fujian, China (with veins sometimes bifurcated and then merging again or with two neighboring veins merging to form one vein, which are different from the simple veins traditionally described for Nilssoniopteris and Nilssonia, the marginal veins described in Yabeiella, and the forking and anastomosing secondary veins of Danaeopsis), he erected a new genus and a new species, Mironeura dakengensis, with unknown reproductive structures and cuticle features, to accommodate these fossils (Fig. 2.5). Later, more fossils that resemble Nilssoniopteris in macromorphology and cuticular features but with forked and merged veins were reported under the genus Nilssoniopteris, including Nilssoniopteris beyrichii from the Lower Cretaceous of Huolinhe, Inner Mongolia, China (Deng, 1995), Nilssoniopteris neimenguensis from the Lower Jurassic of Xilinhot, Inner Mongolia, China (Deng et al., 2017b), and Nilssoniopteris zirabensis from the Lower Jurassic of Iran (Schweitzer and Kirchner, 2003) (Fig. 2.1–2.3). This type of vein anastomosis was also reported in entire-margined Nilssonia having cycadalean-type cuticles, such as Nilssonia dictyophylla from the Lower Cretaceous of the outer zone of Japan (Kimura and Okubo, 1985) (Fig. 2.4) and Nilssonia taeniopterides from the Upper Triassic–Lower Jurassic of Queensland, Australia (Pattemore, 2016). These special veins are also found in our Xinjiang samples, especially in Nilssoniopteris crassiaxis n. sp., which fork and then merge, or merge with the adjacent veins. Due to the fact that this anastomosing venation is shared by both the bennettitalean Nilssoniopteris and the cycadalean Nilssonia, we see no logical reason to establish a new taxon solely on the basis of these anastomosing veins.We thus add the anastomos- ing venation to the diagnoses of these two genera, and accordingly, suggest abandoning the genus name Mironeura Zhou, 1978. Because no cuticular features were provided, we suggest following the notion of van Konijnenburg-van Cittert et al. (2017) to transferM. dakengensis Zhou, 1978 to the genus Taeniopteris.
Nilssoniopteris hamiensis Zhao and Deng, new species Figures 3–8
2010 Nilssoniopteris vittata; Deng et al., p. 93, fig. 4.11C.
Figure 2. Line drawings of species with anastomosing veins in Nilssonia and Nilssoniopteris.(1) Nilssoniopteris beyrichii (Deng, 1995); (2) Nilssoniopteris neimenguensis (Deng et al., 2017b); (3) Nilssoniopteris zirabensis (Schweitzer and Kirchner, 2003); (4) Nilssonia dictyophylla (Kimura and Okubo, 1985); (5) Mironeura dakengensis (Zhou, 1978), which should be more correctly transferred to Taeniopteris.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232