search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Ausich et al.—Fort Payne Formation Batocrinidae


683


Figure 2. North-South cross section of early and middle Viséan strata from southern Indiana to north-central Kentucky. Tournaisian conodonts that were recovered from the basal meter of the Fort Payne Formation indicate a highly condensed interval (Leslie et al., 1996). Tournaisian strata are designated (although not to scale) with a T.


between autochthonous and allochthonous facies is based on a combination of sedimentologic, stratigraphic, and taphonomic criteria. These interpretations were strengthened by the demonstration that each of the autochthonous facies supported statistically different crinoid and blastoid faunas (Krivicich et al., 2014). Further, partially complete echinoids are only present in facies interpreted to have been autochthonous (Thompson and Ausich, 2016). The siltstone and sheet packstone facies comprise the vast


majority of the volume of the Fort Payne sediments. The auto- chthonous facies are a small fraction of the total volume of the Fort Payne Formation and tend to co-occur in restricted geographic clusters, presumably along the toe-of-slope near the mouths of submarine canyons (Ausich and Meyer, 1990; Greb et al., 2008).


Regional distribution of crinoids


As noted above, early Viséan facies vary from carbonate ramps in Iowa, Illinois, and Missouri, to deltaic settings in Indiana, to mixed carbonate-siliciclastic settings of Kentucky, Tennessee, and Alabama. Because early Viséan crinoids have been well documented across this entire region (Hall, 1858, 1859a, b, 1860; Lane, 1973; Ausich and Lane, 1982; Kammer, 1984; Ausich and Kammer, 1990, 1991a, b, 1992; Ausich and Meyer, 1992; Kammer and Ausich, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996; Ausich et al., 1997, 2000; Meyer and Ausich, 1997; Krivicich et al., 2013, 2014; Rhenberg et al., 2016), the paleogeographic dis- tribution of batocrinds can be evaluated with a considerable degree of confidence. During the early Viséan (late Osagean), the distribution of individual genera and species through this region was variable.


Abatocrinus, Alloprosallocrinus, Eretmocrinus, Macrocrinus, and Uperocrinus occurred through the region in both silici- clastic and carbonate facies and in both shallow- and deep-water settings. As noted by Krivicich et al. (2014), one of the most striking aspects of crinoid distributions is that all species of the genus Dizygocrinus were confined to shallower water facies in the Eastern Interior Basin. Dizygocrinus was present in the carbonate ramp setting of the Keokuk Limestone as well as the same basic setting when siliciclastics overtopped the Keokuk ramp (lower part of the Warsaw Formation). Dizygocrinus also occurred in various delta platform facies of the Borden Delta (Edwardsville Formation; Van Sant, 1964; Ausich, 1983), as well as in the Muldraugh Member of the Borden Formation, which was the platform facies equivalent of the Fort Payne Formation (Ausich et al., 2000). However, Dizygocrinus was absent from toe-of-slope facies of the New Providence Shale (Kammer, 1984) and the Fort Payne Formation. Other genera also had more restricted distributions.


Eutrochocrinus is only known from the shallow-water carbo- nates of the Keokuk Limestone on the western portion of the basin. Magnuscrinus only occurred in deeper water settings in the eastern portion of the Eastern Interior Seaway, where it was present in carbonate and siliciclastic settings. Gongylocrinus is only known from three specimens, so any statements about its environmental preferences are tentative. However, the only early Viséan species of this genus occurred in a channel sand- stone facies in the shallow-water delta platform facies of the Edwardsville Formation in Indiana. At the species level, only Abatocrinus steropes (Hall,


1859a), Alloprosallocrinus conicus Casseday and Lyon, 1862, Macrocrinus mundulus (Hall, 1859a), and Uperocrinus


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232