search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Leite et al.—Limnic Ostracoda from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil


Description.—Small carapace, sub-squarish in lateral view, with height increasing evenly to the posterior margin, and greatest length at mid height. Left valve larger than right valve, overlapping all the margins of the carapace, with a well-marked overlap at the ventral region. Dorsal margin nearly straight to smoothly curvilinear, and ventral margin with a small concavity at the end of the first third of the carapace. Anterior margin sub- rounded and lower than the posterior margin. Posterior margin rounded. Smooth surface. In dorsal view, greatest width at the posterior end.


Materials.—Three levels from Tereza Farm, João Pinheiro, Minas Gerais State, southeastern Brazil: MP-3318, 50 car- apaces; MP-3428, 34 carapaces; MP-3436, 13 carapaces.


Remarks.—Considering that the type material for Darwinula martinsi Silva, 1978 is misplaced, this species was redescribed by Do Carmo et al. (2004b) based on neotypes from the type locality. Tomé et al. (2014) considered this species as a junior synonym for Alicenula leguminella (Forbes in Lyell, 1855). However, the material illustrated by Tomé et al. (2014) is dif- ferent from the material designated as neotype for Darwinula martinsi by Do Carmo et al. (2004b), due to the carapace con- tour, height/length ratio, and other diagnostic characteristics. Additionally, the specimens illustrated by Tomé et al. (2014) are different from Alicenula leguminella due to the anterior margin, which is slimmer, the posterior margin, which is wider, and the marked inclination of the ventral margin to the anterior margin.


Therefore, when reviewing the neotypes that once were identi- fied as Darwinula martinsi, it was verified that the species can be transferred to Penthesilenula martinsi (Silva, 1978). This reassignment to the genus Penthesilenula is based on the sub- quadrate shape in lateral view, a diagnostic characteristic that distinguishes it from Darwinula Brady and Robertson in Jones, 1885 emend. Pinto and Kotzian, 1961, associated with the height/length ratio ~0.5 (Ballent and Díaz, 2012). Such char- acteristics are observed in Darwinula martinsi, justifying the reassignment to Penthesilenula martinsi.


Penthesilenula pintoi new species Figure 6.4–6.6


Holotype.—A carapace (CP-871), length 0.680mm, height 0.310mm, width 0.240mm. Type level 23.57m from the base of the outcrop, Quiricó Formation, Areado Group, São Fran- cisco Basin, Lower Cretaceous, Aptian, from the banks of the São José River, São José Farm, Presidente Olegário munici- pality, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.


Paratypes.—Research Collection, Museum of Geosciences, Institute of Geosciences, Brasília, Brazil: carapace CP-875, length 0.730mm, height 0.320mm, width 0.320mm; carapace CP-894, length 0.680mm, height 0.300mm, width 0.250mm; carapace CP-895, length 0.680mm, height 0.310mm, width 0.220mm; carapace CP-896, length 0.680mm, height 0.300mm, width 0.210mm; carapace CP-897, length 0.660mm, height 0.290mm, width 0.200mm.


673


Diagnosis.—Small carapace, oblong. Left valve larger than right valve. Dorsal margin smoothly curved, with well-marked inclination to the anterior margin. Ventral margin nearly straight with small concavity by the end of the first third. Anterior margin sub-rounded and low. Posterior margin rounded and broad.


Occurrence.—Brazil: Tereza Farm, João Pinheiro municipality and São José Farm, on the banks of the São José and Quiricó rivers, Minas Gerais State, southeastern Brazil, Quiricó For- mation, Areado Group, São Francisco Basin, Lower Cretaceous, Valanginian to Aptian.


Description.—Small carapace, sub-oval to sub-quadrate in lateral view, with height increasing evenly to the posterior margin, and greatest length at mid-height. Left valve larger than right valve, overlapping all the margins of the carapace. Dorsal margin nearly straight, inclined to the anterior margin, and ventral margin nearly straight, with small convexity anteriorly. Anterior margin sub-rounded and low. Posterior margin roun- ded and broader than the anterior one. Smooth surface. In dorsal view, width increasing evenly towards the posterior end.


Etymology.—In honor of Professor Ricardo Lourenço Pinto, Institute of Geosciences of the University of Brasília, for rich discussions on the Darwinulidae Family.


Materials.—Three levels from the São José creek, São José Farm, Presidente Olegário, Minas Gerais State, southeastern Brazil: MP-2884, four carapaces; MP-2895, 30 carapaces; MP-2960, 100 carapaces; one level from Quiricó creek, São José Farm, Presidente Olegário, Minas Gerais State, south- eastern Brazil: MP-3421, three carapaces; 22 levels from Tereza Farm, João Pinheiro, Minas Gerais State, southeastern Brazil: MP-3322, one carapace; MP-3323, four carapaces; MP-3325, three carapaces; MP-3326, 200 carapaces; MP-3327, 100 carapaces; MP-3328, two carapaces; MP-3333, one carapace; MP-3335, seven carapaces; MP-3340, 14 carapaces; MP-3427, three carapaces; MP-3428, 40 carapaces; MP-3429, 40 carapaces; MP-3431, 80 carapaces; MP-3433, six carapaces; MP-3434, 200 carapaces; MP-3436, 29 carapaces; MP-3437, 60 carapaces; MP-3438, two carapaces; MP-3439, 17 carapaces; MP-3442, 40 carapaces; MP-3443, 18 carapaces; MP-3448, two carapaces.


Remarks.—This species is more elongated and has the anterior margin broader than Penthesilenula martinsi (Silva, 1978). The taxonomic revision by Rossetti and Martens (1998) resulted in the description of three new genera, and a new diagnosis for Darwinula, whose right valve overlaps the left one, through the entire margin, except in the hinge region. Additionally, in lateral view, Darwinula is more elongated, with greatest height in the posterior quarter; posterior margin more broadly rounded than the anterior one; anterior margin narrower and slightly curved towards the ventral margin; ventral margin nearly straight, and dorsal margin curved. The genus Penthesilenula is sub-rectangular in lateral view, as discussed above. The closed carapaces herein studied did not allow observation of internal characteristics. However, due to its oval to sub-rectangular


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232