search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Leite et al.—Limnic Ostracoda from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil


Occurrence.—Brazil: Recôncavo Basin, São Sebastião Forma- tion, Lower Cretaceous (Krömmelbein and Weber, 1971; Poropat and Colin, 2012a), Barremian (Silva et al., 2007). São Francisco basin, Quiricó Formation, Lower Cretaceous, Valanginian.


Description.—Medium-size carapace, sub-rectangular in lateral view, with greatest height anteriorly, and greatest length along mid-height. Right valve larger than left valve, overlapping the anterior, posterior, and ventral margins of the carapace. Dorsal margin nearly straight, with inconspicuous hump anteriorly; ventral margin nearly straight, sub-parallel to the dorsal margin. Anterior margin rounded; posterior margin sub-rounded. Reti- culated ornamentation all through the carapace. May exhibit nodules along the surface of the carapace, a smaller number of nodules, or complete absence of them. When present, nodules are in the ocular region, dorsally to medianly, and smaller ones scattered. Normal porecanals present in eye region, rounded. In dorsal view, larger nodules are evident, with greatest width posteriorly to mid-length.


Materials.—Four levels from Tereza Farm, João Pinheiro, Minas Gerais State, southeastern Brazil: MP-3324, two car- apaces; MP-3326, four carapaces; MP-3431, one carapace; MP-3434, 25 carapaces.


Remarks.—Due to the presence of specimens with and without nodules, it is necessary to propose a new diagnosis and description to Cypridea conjugata. Leite et al. (2016) discussed the similarity between specimens with and without nodules, in outline and in size, as well as valve relation. However, speci- mens with poorly developed nodules were not recovered. In the present work, such middle-ground specimens are recorded for the first time. Besides the small quantity, they always occur in specific regions of the carapace, and show marked normal por- ecanals. Do Carmo et al. (1999) suggested that the growth of nodules in Theriosynoecum kirtlingtonense Bate, 1965 indicates high salinity, caused by the reinforcement of the excretory sys- tem to maintain osmoregulation. In the same way, some por- ecanals in ostracodes are part of the excretory system, when present in nodule region, indicating that nodules are of pheno- typical origin as in Cyprideis torosa (Jones, 1850) (Do Carmo et al., 1999). In the present work, considering the good pre- servation, the presence of individuals with and without nodules, a new description and diagnosis are proposed, emended from Krömmelbein (1962).


Cypridea infima Krömmelbein and Weber, 1971 emend. Figure 5.8–5.13


1971 Cypridea infimaKrömmelbein andWeber, p. 71, pl. 1,fig. 3.


671


Holotype.—A carapace (BfB, type Nr. 7770) from the Candeias layers, lower and middle portions, Bahia State, Brazil (Kröm- melbein and Weber, 1971).


Diagnosis.—Very small carapace, with oval outline in lateral view. Reticulated surface, with normal porecanals throughout the carapace. Left valve with prominent angular projection in the posteroventral region.


Occurrence.—Brazil: Recôncavo Basin, Candeias Formation, lower and middle portions, Lower Cretaceous, (Krömmelbein and Weber, 1971; Poropat and Colin, 2012a), Berriasian– Valanginian (Silva et al., 2007); São Francisco Basin, Quiricó Formation, LowerCretaceous, Valanginian–Hauterivian/Aptian?


Description.—Very small carapace, sub-oval in lateral view, with greatest height antero-medianly, and greatest length in mid-height. Left valve larger than right valve, overlapping all the margins of the carapace, especially the ventral margin. Left valve with prominent angular projection in the posteroventral region. Dorsal margin convex, inclined posteriorly; ventral margin nearly straight to smoothly convex. Pronounced ventral beak and notch without exceeding the ventral margin. Anterior margin rounded. Posterior margin sub-rounded and smaller than the anterior one. Punctate ornamentation. Small nodules present throughout the carapace. Surface covered by very tiny rounded porecanals, also present in nodule region. In dorsal view, greatest width posteriorly.


Materials.—Nine levels from Tereza Farm, João Pinheiro, Minas Gerais State, southeastern Brazil: MP-3318, two car- apaces; MP-3322, three carapaces; MP-3427, five carapaces; MP-3428, five carapaces; MP-3431, three carapaces; MP-3433, two carapaces; MP-3434, three carapaces; MP-3444, two carapaces.


Remarks.—Krömmelbein and Weber (1971) described only the porecanals through the carapace. In the present work, the good preservation of material allowed observation of a punctate ornamentation, and that the porecanals are present along the carapace and in the small nodules. For this reason, a new description and diagnosis are herein presented, emended from Krömmelbein and Weber (1971).


Cypridea jequiensis Krömmelbein and Weber, 1971 Figure 5.14–5.16


1971 Cypridea jequiensis Krömmelbein and Weber, p. 75, pl. 3, fig. 11.


Figure 5. Species of the genus Cypridea Bosquet, 1852 and Neuquenocypris Musacchio, 1973, from the outcrop at Tereza Farm, João Pinheiro municipality, Minas Gerais State, southeastern Brazil. (1–7) Cypridea conjugata Krömmelbein and Weber, 1971 emend. (1–3) Adult with nodules (CP-863), right lateral view (RLV), left lateral view (LLV), and dorsal view (DV); (4, 5) adult without nodules (CP-864), right lateral view (RLV) and left lateral view (LLV); (6, 7) adult with nodules (CP-863), porecanals details. (8–13) Cypridea infima Krömmelbein and Weber, 1971 emend. (8–10) Adult (CP-867), right lateral view (RLV), left lateral view (LLV), and dorsal view (DV); (11–13) adult (CP-867), detail of the porecanals in nodule region and detail of porecanals on the surface of the carapace. (14–16) Cypridea jequiensis Krömmelbein and Weber, 1971, adult (CP-868), right lateral view (RLV), left lateral view (LLV), and dorsal view (DV). (17–19) Neuquenocypris (Protoneuquenocypris) antiqua Musacchio and Simeoni, 1991, adult (CP-869), right lateral view (RLV), left lateral view (LLV), and dorsal view (DV). (1–5, 14–19) Scale bars are 200 µm; (6, 7) scale bars are 5 µm; (8–10) scale bars are 100 µm; (11–13) scale bars are 20 µm.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232