search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
628


Journal of Paleontology 92(4):611–633 Species doubtfully attributed to Homomya


Three Comanchean species were placed in the genus Homomya by their authors. However, their valve morphologies differ substantially from species of Homomya, and their internal fea- tures are not known because the type specimens are preserved as external molds. Therefore, these species are provisionally retained in “Homomya.”


“Homomya” jurafacies Cragin, 1893 Figure 11.1, 11.2


1893 Homomya jurafacies Cragin, p. 191, pl. 39, figs. 1, 2. 1928 Homomya jurafacies; Adkins, p. 140.


1937 Liopistha (Psilomya) jurafacies; Whitney, p. 143, pl. 28, figs. 1, 2.


1952 Liopistha (Psilomya) jurafacies; Whitney, p. 68.


2002 Psilomya jurafacies; Akers and Akers, p. 388, 389, figs. 371, 372.


Lectotype.—Two syntypes collected by J. Taff are cataloged as UT 17236, Non-vertebrate Paleontology Laboratory, which are from Hickory Creek, Burnet County, Texas. The smaller specimen is better preserved and is here designated the lecto- type, and the larger specimen becomes the paralectotype. Topotypes are UT 8307, UT 8309, UT 17236.


Occurrence.—Lower Albian Glen Rose Formation in Burnet and Bosque counties, central Texas.


Description.—A large, equivalved, ovate-trapezoidal shell with a tall, angular, prosogyrate umbo, average length-to-height ratio 1.27 ± 0.106; umbo close to anterior margin about 27% of the length; anterior margin evenly rounded, ventral margin broadly curved, posterior margin nearly straight, inclined about 150° to the dorsal margin; lunule short, narrow; escutcheon longer, shallow; pallial line a faint shallow groove at both anterior- ventral and posterior-dorsal margins. Dentition not evident on type specimens.


Remarks.—“Homomya” jurafacies is very similar to “Homomya” solida. The type specimens of “H.” jurafacies were collected from the Glen Rose Formation in ‘the Alternating beds’ from central Texas in Burnet and Bosque counties and the types of “H.” solida are from the Glen Rose formation in Parker, Hood, Erath, and Travis counties, north Texas. The small number of available specimens is not a statistically significant population; however, their measurements are quite similar: the length of four specimens of “H.” jurafacies ranges 73–88mm, height 53–69mm, articulated thickness 51–57.2mm, and the ratio of umbo distance from anterior margin to length is 0.18–0.32; a single specimen of “H.” solida is 81.7mm long, height 69mm, thickness 57.2mm, with the ratio of umbo distance to length 0.35. The posteriormargin


of “H.” jurafacies is straighter and more truncate than that of “H.” solida.


Whitney (1937, 1952) reclassified this species as well as


“H.” solida in Psilomya White; however, Psilomya is a member of Poromyidae Dall, which is characterized by radial striae, a single cardinal tooth, an external ligament, and no posterior gape. Neither “H.” jurafacies nor “H.” solida bears these features. Although Whitney (1937) described two cardinal teeth in both valves of “H.” jurafacies, these are not visible on the internal mold she illustrated (Whitney, 1937, pl. 28, fig. 2). Molds of teeth are not visible in specimens UT 8307, UT 8309, and UT 17236. Thus, both species are here provisionally retained in the genus “Homomya.”


‘Homomya’ solida Cragin, 1893 Figure 11.3, 11.4


1893 Homomya solida Cragin, p. 191, pl. 39, figs. 3, 4. 1928 Homomya solida; Adkins, p. 141.


1937 Liopistha (Psilomya) solida; Whitney, p. 141, pl. 25, figs. 1, 2; 1952, p. 69.


1952 Liopistha (Psilomya) fletcheri Whitney, p. 68, pl. 16, figs. 3, 4.


2002 Psilomya solida; Akers and Akers, p. 390, 471, figs. 373, 374.


Holotype.—“Homomya” solida holotype BEG-UT 21724; this single specimen becomes the holotype by original designation. Three additional specimens in the Non-vertebrate Paleontology Laboratory collections are: UT 38950, “not illustrated, Gran- bury, Brazos bluffs at railroad bridge, Texas, Stone collector”; UT 34126, Parker County; and UT 17296. The type specimen of Liopistha fletcheri is unknown.


Occurrence.—Lower Albian Glen Rose Formation in north and central Texas. The holotype specimen label states: “syntype, Hinor, Parker Co., Tx, Glen Rose, Taff collector.” Whitney collected L. fletcheri from the Salenia texana zone, Lower Member, Glen Rose Formation at Julian Creek, Bandera, Texas.


Remarks.—The posterior margin of this large, ovate shell is rounded in contrast to the straight margin inclined toward dorsal margin of ‘Homomya’ jurafacies. Whitney (1952) distinguished Liopistha fletcheri from “H.” solida by the overall shape: “a more prolonged posterior, a concave posterior cardinal margin and a more rounded ventral margin” (p. 69). These subtle differences are evident by comparing photographed specimens but have not been substantiated by statistical analysis. L. fletcheri is larger but the length-to-height and height-to-width ratios are close to those of “H.” solida and do not support the definition of a separate species. The generic assignment of “H.” solida is indeterminate because dentition of this species is unknown and radial ornament is not evident.


Figure 11. (1, 2) Homomya jurafacies Cragin, 1893; lectoparatype UT 17236, left valve, right valve. (3, 4) Homomya solida, holotype UT 21724; (3) right valve; (4) dorsal view. (5–8) Liopistha (Sergipemya) alta (Roemer, 1852), holotype STIPB-Roemer-79, Bonn Museum; (5) drawing of right valve (Roemer, 1852, pl. 6, fig. 11); (6) right valve, note minute nodes on concentric rugae (photo by Georg Heumann, Steinmann-Institut, Paläontologie); (7) left valve, minute granule-like nodes on concentric rugae create a granular texture; (8) posterior view showing gape and elongate oval escutcheon on dorsal margin. (9, 10) Panopea henselli;(9) left valve; (10) dorsal views. (11) Homomya comalensis in situ, Regional Dense member, basal Person Formation, Stone Crossing outcrop, New Braunfels, Texas; dotted lines approximate bedding. (1–10) Scale bar=1 cm; (11) scale bar=5 cm.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232