1352


Journal of Paleontology 91(6):1351–1352


much new material in my own backyard in Wales, here accom- panied by my good paleontological friend Bob Owens. New paleogeographies followed.As I became engrossed in the details of trilobite systematics, functional morphology became a particular interest, and I have sought to understandmore about howtrilobites fed, swam and interacted with their marine habitat ever since. When I joined the Natural History Museum in London


(then universally known as the BM [British Museum]) it was soon to become the center of another revolution—cladistics. By then I had inherited responsibility for the graptolites as well as trilobites, and to both groups I applied the new techniques developed by Colin Patterson and his colleagues to rationalize classification. The early development of graptolite colonies proved crucial, while ventral structures in trilobites provided new ways of attacking long standing problems of higher classification. My belief in studying specimens to get a proper appraisal of characters remains unshaken. Some of the concepts developed during this period remain in play, while others have become outmoded, which is exactly as it should be. To be in London at this particular time was nothing less than fortuitous. With this background it was also natural to ask how trilo-


Rushton, and Robin Cocks as the oldest of these friends, Derek Siveter, Derek Briggs, Roger Cooper, Noel James, and Niles Eldredge followed shortly thereafter. Brian Chatterton, Alan Cooper, Nigel Hughes, and Mary Droser became good friends in the nineties. I cannot list all those with whom I have enjoyed fruitful collaborations—there are just too many of them. They are all tacitly acknowledged here. My first book was written for the Natural History Museum,


bites as a whole related to the initial diversification of the arthropods. Whittington’s Burgess Shale research group were busy clarifying the vital fossils at just the right time in the eighties. When I was sent Steve Gould’s book Wonderful Life to review for Nature, I realized that the arthropods provided the best material to examine his challenging ideas. Derek Briggs and I set about producing what was the first computer-based cladogram illustrating the relationships among the early Cambrian arthropods —a research program that continues today. Recruiting Matthew Wills as our joint student allowed us quantitatively to test and refute Gould’s claims about greater morphological disparity in the Cambrian. A decade later I collaborated with molecular biologists to see if their data might calibrate the ‘phylogenetic fuse’ that preceded the diversification of the animal phyla. I still regard this as an unresolved conundrum. Much of my research has been achieved thanks to collea- gues who have become friends. If I mention Bob Owens, Adrian


and so began my parallel life in trying to reach a public wider than just the research community. My books remain in print, which answers one of my more staid Museum colleagues who long ago warned me against wasting my time with “ephemera.” I have been lucky with both my British publisher, HarperCollins, and my US publisher, Knopf, in having very supportive editors. Although I suspect that if my 1997 biography of Life had not sold so well I would never have been commissioned to write Trilobite, which is probably the nearest I will get to an autobiography. The UK edition has an excla- mation mark after the Trilobite! that was dropped in the US. A pity: I wanted it to stand against all those books featuring Tyrannosaurus rex! to earn the trilobites the place they deserve. The books allowed me to broaden my horizons to become the natural historian I have always been at heart. They allowed me to visit parts of the world where the trilobites would never have taken me: to Hawaii, New Zealand, and Yellowstone National Park. I have been fortunate enough to have had the chance to develop my own narrative voice over eight books, which I hope serves to lead the reader further into the subject. I hope that this contributes in a small way to keeping paleon- tology alive as a discipline at a time when funding is often so precarious. So thank you Paleontological Society for the award of your


medal. And thank you to all those who helped me along the way to exploit the luck that accompanied me from the beginning.


Department of Earth Sciences Natural History Museum London


London, United Kingdom SW7 5BD r.fortey@dsl.pipex.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276