1192
Journal of Paleontology 91(6):1178–1198
Treptichnus pedum, indicating higher ichnodiversity than in the underlying ichnozone 1. The presence of Cruziana isp. in these strata is particularly significant because it reinforces evidence for the presence of arthropod-produced trace fossils in the Treptichnus pedum Zone. Most of the trace fossils appear in the lowermost interval of the zone (171–173m above the base of
regarded as Cambrian Age 2–3 (Buatois and Mángano, 2011). This is supported by the presence of Pelagiella lorenzi (Pelagiella subangulata; Steiner et al., 2007).
Lower Shale Member) (Fig. 7). This ichnozone is defined by the first appearance of T. pedum, and is regarded as Fortunian in age (Jensen, 2003; Buatois and Mángano, 2011), being referred to as Ichnozone II in the global ichnostratigraphic scheme or T. pedum Zone (Narbonne et al., 1987; MacNaughton and Narobonne, 1999; Jensen, 2003). This is consistent with the presence of the Anabarites trisulcatus-Protohertzina anabarica Zone (Hamdi et al., 1989). In strict ichnologic terms, the first occurrence of Treptichnus pedum together with the first bilobate trace Cruziana isp. may be taken as evidence that the Ediacaran- Cambrian boundary is placed within the Lower Shale Member, 171m above its base. As discussed above, however, integration with small shelly fossils and evaluation of environmental con- straints suggest placing the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary at the base of the Soltanieh Formation or within the Lower Dolomite Member, rather than within the Lower Shale Member. Ichnozone 3 characterizes the middle interval of the Upper
Shale Member (80–178m above its base; Fig. 7). This ichno- zone is defined by a sudden increase in the abundance of trace fossils and the occurrence of more complex burrows, including Cruziana problematica, Phycodes isp., and Treptichnus pollardi. The other elements of this ichnozone are Cochlichnus anguineus, Curvolithus isp., Gordia marina, Helminthoi- dichnites tenuis, Helminthopsis tenuis, Palaeophycus tubularis, Planolites montanus, Treptichnus pedum, and Treptichnus isp. This ichnozone corresponds to ichnozone III of the global ichnofossil scheme, encompassing the lower half of the Rusophycus avalonensis Zone of the Chapel Island Formation, which represents the upper half ofMember 2 and higher strata of the Chapel Island Formation, Burin Peninsula (Narbonne et al., 1987), and the lower half of the Rusophycus avalonensis Zone of the Mackenzie Mountains, which characterizes the Backbone Ranges Formation and the lower interval of the Vampire Formation (MacNaughton and Narbonne, 1999). However, R. avalonensis has not been found at comparable levels in the Soltanieh Formation. Ichnozone 3 is interpreted as late Fortunian–Cambrian Age 2 (Buatois and Mángano, 2011). Ichnozone 4 represents the uppermost interval of the Upper
Shale Member (178m above its base to the base of the Upper Dolomite Member; Fig. 7). This zone is based on the first appearance of large back-filled trace fossils (Psammichnites gigas), together with bilobate, trilobite-like resting trace fossils (Rusophycus avalonensis), and large locomotion trace fossils (Didymaulichnus miettensis). The other elements of this ichno- zone are Cruziana isp., Curvolithus isp., Palaeophycus tubularis, Phycodes isp., Planolites montanus, and Treptichnus pedum. Ichnozone 4 corresponds to ichnozones III and IV of the global scheme, encompassing both the upper half of the Rusophycus avalonensis Zone of Burin Peninsula (Narbonne et al., 1987) and the Mackenzie Mountains (MacNaughton and Narbonne, 1999), and the Cruziana tenella Zone of the latter region, which characterizes the upper interval of the Vampire Formation (MacNaughton and Narbonne, 1999). This zone is
Discussion
The Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary is globally defined by a point placed with specific reference to the first appearance of T. pedum in the global stratotype section in Newfoundland (Narbonne et al., 1987) and in other regions, including the Mackenzie Mountains of Canada (MacNaughton and Narbonne, 1999; Carbone and Narbonne, 2014), the Flinders Ranges of South Australia (Jensen et al., 1998), eastern Finnmark, Norway (Føyn and Glaessner, 1979; Högström et al., 2013), Sonora, Mexico (Stewart et al., 1984; Sour-Tovar et al., 2007), and Death Valley, Eastern California (Jensen et al., 2002), among many other areas. In the Alborz Mountains of northern Iran, however, the first appearance datum of Treptichnus pedum occurs stratigraphically higher in the section. Although ichnozone 1 consists of grazing trails, which are common in Ediacaran strata elsewhere, these trace fossils are also abundant in Fortunian deposits in Burin Peninsula, in connection with microbially stabilized surfaces (Buatois et al., 2014). In contrast to the Fortunian of Burin Peninsula, arthropod trackways are absent in ichnozone 1 in the Soltanieh Formation. We hypo- thesize that the presence of an ichnofauna of “Ediacaran aspect” and the late appearance of Treptichnus pedum in the Soltanieh Formation is due to environmental constraints. Buatois et al. (2013) noted that this ichnotaxon has a broad environmental tolerance, albeit displaying a preference for sandy substrates. The shelf shales of the Soltanieh Formation may have represented the seaward limit of the T. pedum producer. Alternatively, because T. pedum is typically preserved along lithologic interfaces, its absence in the shelfal shale may simply reflect a taphonomic constraint. Therefore, ichnozone 1 in the Alborz Mountains may be understood as a distal expression of the Treptichnus pedum Zone, which is commonly recognized in settings above storm wave base (Buatois et al., 2013). A similar situation has been noted in the Ediacaran–Cambrian succession of eastern Yunnan Province, South China (Zhu, 1997), western Mongolia (Smith et al., 2015), Lesser Himalaya, India (Singh et al., 2014), and southeastern Kazakhstan (Weber et al., 2013), where the first appearance of the trace-fossil T. pedum postdates the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition. Ichnozone 2 of the Soltanieh Formation corresponds in part
to ichnozone III of global ichnofossil zones and the Treptichnus pedum Zone of the Chapel Island Formation, Burin Peninsula, which characterizes the lower part of Member 2, from 2.4 to 133m above its base (Narbonne et al., 1987; Landing, 1996). This ichnozone is also represented in the upper interval of the Ingta Formation in the Mackenzie Mountains (MacNaughton and Narbonne, 1999) and the Nomtsas Formation of Namibia (Crimes and Germs, 1982; Geyer and Uchman, 1995), among other areas. Integration of trace fossils and small shelly faunas suggests that ichnozone 2 of the Soltanieh Formation is best regarded as the upper half of the global Treptichnus pedum Zone to accommodate the shelf deposits of early Fortunian age that make up the lower interval of the Lower Shale Member.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236 |
Page 237 |
Page 238 |
Page 239 |
Page 240 |
Page 241 |
Page 242 |
Page 243 |
Page 244 |
Page 245 |
Page 246 |
Page 247 |
Page 248 |
Page 249 |
Page 250 |
Page 251 |
Page 252 |
Page 253 |
Page 254 |
Page 255 |
Page 256 |
Page 257 |
Page 258 |
Page 259 |
Page 260 |
Page 261 |
Page 262 |
Page 263 |
Page 264 |
Page 265 |
Page 266 |
Page 267 |
Page 268 |
Page 269 |
Page 270 |
Page 271 |
Page 272 |
Page 273 |
Page 274 |
Page 275 |
Page 276