search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Weems and Brown—New Occurrences of Paleogene Sea Turtles in South Carolina Table 2. Sources used to establish the age ranges of the cheloniid taxa shown in Figure 11.


Argillochelys cuneiceps (Owen, 1849)—Lowest and highest occurrences are in the lower Eocene (Ypresian) London Clay, England (Moody, 1997). Ashleychelys palmeri Weems and Sanders, 2014—Lowest occurrences are in the lower Oligocene (upper Rupelian) Ashley Formation, South Carolina (Weems and Sanders, 2014) and Old Church Formation, Virginia (Weems, 2014); highest occurrences are in the upper Oligocene (mid-Chattian) Chandler Bridge Formation (Weems and Sanders, 2014; Weems et al., 2016).


Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1758)—No fossil record has been reported for this modern species, but other material assigned to this genus has been reported from the lower Pliocene Bone Valley Formation, Florida (Dodd and Morgan, 1992) and the lower Pliocene part of the Yorktown Formation, North Carolina (Zug, 2001).


Carolinochelys wilsoni Hay, 1923b—Lowest occurrences are in the lower Oligocene (upper Rupelian) Ashley Formation, South Carolina (Weems and Sanders, 2014) and the lower Oligocene (upper Rupelian) Old Church Formation, Virginia (Weems, 2014); highest occurrences are in the upper Oligocene (mid-Chattian) Chandler Bridge Formation, South Carolina (Weems and Sanders, 2014; Weems et al., 2016).


Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus, 1758)—No fossil record has been reported for this species, but specimens assigned to this genus without a species designation are reported from the lower Pliocene Bone Valley Formation, Florida (Dodd and Morgan, 1992).


Eochelone brabantica Dollo, 1903—Lowest and highest occurrences are in middle Eocene (Lutetian) strata at Saint Remy-Geest, Belgium (Casier, 1968).


Eretmochelys imbricata (Linnaeus, 1766)—No fossil record has been reported for this modern species, but specimens assigned to this genus without a species designation are reported from the lower Pliocene Bone Valley Formation, Florida (Dodd and Morgan, 1992). Erquelinnesia gosseleti (Dollo, 1886)—Lowest and highest occurrences are in lower Eocene (lower Ypresian) strata at Erquelinnes, Belgium (Zangerl, 1971).


Euclastes spp. (Eu. wielandi [Hay, 1908] + Eu. roundsi [Weems, 1988])—Lowest occurrence of Euclastes wielandi is in the Upper Cretaceous (middle Campanian) Coachman Formation, South Carolina (Schwimmer et al., 2015), highest occurrence is in the lower Paleocene (Danian) Brightseat Formation, Maryland (Weems, 2014); lowest and highest occurrences of Euclastes roundsi are in the upper Paleocene (Thanetian) Aquia Formation, Maryland and Virginia (Weems, 2014); genus ranges upward into upper Eocene (Priabonian) Parkers Ferry Formation, South Carolina (this paper).


Lepidochelys spp. (L. olivacea [Eschscholtz, 1829] + L. kempii [Garman, 1880])—No fossil record has been reported for these modern species, but specimens assigned to this genus without a species designation are reported from the lower Pliocene Bone Valley Formation, Florida (Dodd and Morgan, 1992) and the lower Pliocene part of the Yorktown Formation, North Carolina (Zug, 2001).


Lophochelyinae – Lowest occurrence of this subfamily is in the Upper Cretaceous (Santonian) lower Mooreville Chalk, Alabama (http://fossilworks.org/bridge.pl? a=taxonInfo&taxon_no=127991); highest occurrences are in the lower Paleocene (Danian) Brightseat Formation, Maryland (Weems, 2014) and in Paleocene strata (stage unspecified), West Africa (Wood, 1973).


Mexichelys coahuilaensis (Brinkman et al., 2009)—Lowest and highest occurrences are in the Upper Cretaceous (upper Campanian) Cerro del Pueblo Formation, Mexico (Brinkman et al., 2009).


Natator depressus (Garman, 1880)—No fossil record has been reported for this modern species (Zangerl et al., 1988).


Pacifichelys spp. (P. urbinae Parham and Pyenson, 2010 + P. hutchisoni [Lynch and Parham, 2003])—Lowest and highest occurrences of these two species respectively are in the middle Miocene (stage not specified) Pisco Formation, Peru and the middle Miocene (Langhian) Round Mountain Silt Formation, California (Parham and Pyenson, 2010).


Procolpochelys charlestonensis Weems and Sanders, 2014—Lowest occurrences are in the lower Oligocene (upper Rupelian) Ashley Formation, South Carolina (Weems and Sanders, 2014) and Old Church Formation, Virginia (Weems, 2014); highest occurrences are in the upper Oligocene (Chattian) Chandler Bridge Formation, South Carolina (Weems and Sanders, 2014; Weems et al., 2016).


Procolpochelys grandaeva (Leidy, 1851)—Lowest occurrences are in the lower Miocene (Burdigalian) Kirkwood Formation, New Jersey (Zangerl and Turnbull, 1955) and lower Calvert Formation, Maryland (Weems and Sanders, 2014); highest occurrences are in the upper Miocene (Tortonian) St. Marys Formation, Maryland (multiple unpublished specimens in the collection of the Calvert Marine Museum, including CMM-V-5913, CMM-V-3115, and CMM-V-2978).


Puppigerus camperi (Gray, 1831)—Lowest occurrences are in the lower Eocene (Ypresian) London Clay, England (Moody, 1974); highest occurrence is in the middle Eocene (Lutetian) Bracklesham Beds, England (Moody, 1997).


Tasbacka spp. (T. aldabergeni Nessov, 1987 + T. ruhoffi [Weems, 1988])—Lowest and highest occurrences for T. aldabergeni are in the upper Paleocene (Thanetian) Ouled Abdoun phosphate basin, Morocco; lowest and highest occurrences for T. ruhoffi are in the upper Paleocene (Thanetian) Aquia Formation, Maryland.


Toxochelys latiremis Cope, 1873—Lowest occurrences are in the Upper Cretaceous (upper Santonian-lower Campanian) Niobrara Formation, Kansas (Nicholls, 1988); the highest occurrences are in the Upper Cretaceous (lower Maastrichtian) Ripley Formation, Tennessee (Nicholls, 1988).


Trachyaspis lardyi Meyer, 1843—Lowest well documented occurrences are in the lower Miocene (Burdigalian) lower Calvert Formation, Maryland (multiple unpublished specimens in the collection of the Calvert Marine Museum, including CMM-V-243); the highest occurrence is in an unnamed upper Pliocene (lower Piacenzian) unit at La Farfanara, Salsomaggiore Terme (PR) Italy (Villa and Raineri, 2015).


Paleocene, early Oligocene, and late Miocene. Each of these radiations followed times of exceptional extinction within this group. The first radiation occurred in the Paleocene, and it is readily explained as the result of sea turtle survivors of the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event undergoing rapid evolutionary radiation to fill niches vacated by victims of that event. Similarly, the early Oligocene radiation of pancheloniid turtles likely resulted from the filling of niches vacated due to extinctions caused by the end-Eocene cooling event that accompanied the beginning of widespread Antarctic glaciation at the beginning of the Oligocene (e.g., Prothero et al., 2003). This extinction event affected pancheloniid turtles (e.g., Puppigerus and Euclastes) and caused extinction among many other groups of marine animals, including the paleophid sea snakes and most archaeocete whales. The cause of the late Miocene radiation of modern cheloniid sea turtles is less obvious, but it does coincide with the late Miocene global climatic deterioration that heralded the beginning of significant


northern hemisphere glaciation leading up to the Pleistocene ice ages (Maslin et al., 1996). An interesting result of this phylogeny is the close rela-


tionship indicated for Ashleychelys and Procolpochelys. This likely reflects the strong regional endemism that developed among pancheloniid turtles during the Oligocene (Weems and Sanders, 2014) and further supports their suggestion that the southeastern United States was an ecosystem somewhat isolated from other parts of the Oligocene coastal marine world. Although Carolinochelys is an Oligocene South Carolina taxon that shows close relationship to the living branch of cheloniid turtles, this taxon is a rather specialized form that has strongly bent humeral shafts and thus is an unlikely ancestor for any of the later or living cheloniid turtles. This conclusion is reinforced by the fact that no close


relatives of the living cheloniid lineages show up in the western Northern Atlantic region until the early Miocene with the abrupt appearance of Trachyaspis lardyi Meyer, 1843, a specialized


1241


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276