Journal of Paleontology, 91(6), 2017, p. 1341 Copyright © 2017, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/17/0088-0906 doi: 10.1017/jpa.2017.108


Awards and Citations


Presentation of the 2015 Schuchert Award of the Paleontological Society to Jonathan Payne


Andrew H. Knoll Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA <aknoll@oeb.harvard.edu>


It is both a privilege and a great pleasure to introduce this year’s Schuchert awardee, Jonathan Payne. I first met Jon about sixteen years ago, when, as a high school science teacher not far removed from his undergraduate training at Williams College, he visited my lab to talk about Ph.D. programs. Even then, Jon didn’t need me to suggest research topics—he liked big questions in life’s history, he really liked mass extinction, and he absolutely loved the end-Permian mass extinction. And already at this early stage of his professional development, Jon understood that paleobiological and geologic data could be integrated to illuminate evolutionary history. Fortunately for me, Jon joined our lab the following fall and


quickly established a research trajectory that, fifteen years later, continues on a strongly positive arc.With minimal guidance from me, Jon started to think both quantitatively and creatively about the end-Permian extinction and its aftermath. For example, while others had noted anecdotally Permo-Triassic reduction in body size, Jon quantified this for gastropods, providing a numerical baseline for subsequent studies of extinction and recovery. With


the generous help of Dan Lehrmann, Jon also began a continuing field program on the Great Bank of Guizhou in South China, establishing a stratigraphic framework that allowed him to quantify latest Permian and Early Triassic species richness and skeletal abundance across an environmental gradient from lagoon to basin. Earlier geochemical research had established that end-Permian extinction was accompanied by a substantial carbon isotopic excursion, but by continuing chemostratigraphic research up to the Middle Triassic, Jon showed that the end-Permian event was only the first of four negative excursions that collectively document the instability of Early Triassic carbon cycling. In general, Jon came to realize the extinction itselfwas act one in a three act play that ended only with the mid-Triassic return of diverse, ecologically and biogeochemically stable marine ecosystems. In a brief postdocwithLeeKump, Jon added biogeochemical


modeling to his tool kit, writing a provocative (in the best possible sense) paper that linked Triassic carbon cycle instability to con- tinuing episodic volcanism and advancing the case, now increas- inglywell supported, for an extinction-level dissolution horizon in carbonate successions that span the Permo-Triassic boundary. Since establishing his own lab at Stanford, Jon has con-


tinued to broaden and deepen his research in exciting ways. Arecent paper on C-isotopic variation following the end-Triassic extinction does for this event what Payne et al. earlier did for P-Tr extinction, showing how a widely recognized boundary phe- nomenon relates to a detailed pattern of secular variation that


developed in its aftermath.And in collaboration with geochemist Don DePaolo, Jon’s papers on Ca isotopic variation across the P-Tr boundary bring an important newtool to bear on extinctions in the geologic record—this research makes the strongest direct case to date for ocean acidification at the time of end-Permian mass extinction. Other continuing research on P-Tr events includes measurements of foraminifer size and diversity to investigate patterns of recovery in Early Triassic oceans. To appreciate the rigor and insight of this paper, one need only compare it to other articles on post-extinction recovery. Most papers consider one piece of evidence, assume that it correctly captures a fundamental truth about all Early Triassic life, and then discuss why previous papers on the subject are wrong. Jon and his colleagues ask instead how our understanding of Early Triassic life and environments can be enriched by granting that all of these contributions provide data appropriate to one group of organisms in one place at one time. By integrating datasets rather than choosing among them, Jon shows the path forward in reconstructing general patterns of Triassic ecosystem recovery. In recent years, Jon has made increasing use of physiology to


address questions of evolutionary history. “Escargot through time,” a terrific essay on theMesozoicmarine revolution, uses physiological insights to ask whether stratigraphic changes in the gastropod fauna support hypotheses of a mid-Mesozoic increase in the nutritional status of the oceans. They do, providing one of the most insightful commentaries on this evolutionary transition since Vermeij’s foun- dational paper and Bambach’s stimulating “Seafood through time” follow-up. Physiology also lies at the core of recent papers on broad patterns of size increase through geologic time. And in an intriguing recent contribution, Jon and his colleagues parse the term “rarity” into its several potential meanings and show that some forms of rarity correspond closely to extinction risk, whereas others do not. Jon Payne and his students are forging ahead along a number


of stratigraphic, quantitative paleobiological, and biogeochemical fronts. At the same time, Jon has established himself as an excel- lent teacher, a gifted mentor, and a valued colleague at Stanford and within the broader scientific community. In short, Jon is an adult—not a term I apply loosely to academics. Jon has emerged as one of paleontology’s rising stars, an unusually broad and deep thinking paleontologist who is leading our field into new partner- ships with geologists, geochemists, physiologists, and evolu- tionary biologists. I am proud to present Jonathan Payne as the 2015 winner of the Paleontological Society’s Schuchert Award.


November 1, 2015 1341


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276