search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
intake in the feeding dip after weaning. Whereas, starvation has a negative effect on gut health, feed intake stimulates the development of the gut wall. Secondly, the digestibility of plasma is high, which is in line with the better growth in pig- lets and young chickens, that have an immature digestive system at a time where plasma is giving its positive effect. When the plasma is easily absorbed it nourishes the entero- cytes and improves the integrity of the gut wall. Thirdly, the immunoglobulin G fraction (IgG) of plasma is re- sponsible for the enhanced pig performance that occurs when spray-dried plasma is fed. IgG specifically binds bacte- ria and viruses. It prevents these bacteria colonising the gut and infecting the animal. The immunoglobulin G fraction of plasma seems to stimulate equal or better growth perfor- mance than whole plasma, and the early responses seem to be more consistently maintained into later post-weaning pe- riods. Because SDPP contains specific antibodies, SDPP reduc- es post-weaning diarrhoea. These antibodies prevent the at- tachment to and infection of the gut wall. Excretion of the pathogenic bacteria and transmission to neighbouring pigs decreases. Finally, plasma contains many bio-active proteins, besides immunoglobulin G that play a significant role in im- mune modulation and communication. It is likely that these proteins exert an effect on the gut wall too.


Systemic health effects SDPP has an outstanding record of improving performance in


young piglets. Studies show that weaned piglets have the same performance when zinc or antibiotics are replaced by spray dried plasma. The SDPP makes young animals more robust against the negative effects of a bacterial infection. The immunoglobulins prevent that ingested pathogens can colonise or infect the animals and disturb the gut microbiota. Besides the local gut effect, some studies suggest that there are also systemic health effects. It is has been observed that SDPP fed piglets had a stronger protection after vaccination against respiratory diseases compared to non-SDPP fed piglets. That gut health affects the health of other organ systems is understandable, because the gut is a such a dominant organ system. Moreover, there is communication between the immune systems of the different organs, for example between the lymphoid tissues in these organs. The use of spray-dried plasma is legally allowed in almost all parts of the world, including the EU. Decreasing antibiotic use, a low carbon footprint of processed by-products, and circulari- ty of agro-systems are additional reasons to use these proteins. Critical or transition periods in juveniles happens in all farmed animals, not only in piglets. The evidence that SDPP has an ef- fect in poultry and fish, is also increasing. Young chicks grow faster and less mortality is seen in shrimps with feed containing SDPP. Also in poultry and aquatic animals antibiotics are used in juveniles to overcome the challenges at the critical transi- tional stages of life. SDPP can help in these groups of animals to decrease the need for antimicrobials, like it does in pigs.


▶ GUT HEALTH | DECEMBER 2020 11


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124