O’Dogherty et al.—Jurassic radiolarians from the Eastern Alps
mass flows of the Hallstatt Mélange trench-like basins formed earlier from material derived from the outer shelf facing the Neotethys Ocean (Hallstatt Zone, Fig. 1.2–1.5), whereas the Tauglboden Mélange trench-like basin formed later from material derived of the lagoonal part of the Hauptdolomit/ Dachstein carbonate platform (Fig. 1.4, 1.5). However, both basins formed syntectonically and suggest a substantial relief between the basin axis and the source area. A third type of radiolarite basin, the Sillenkopf Basin (Missoni et al., 2001), remained in the southern part of the Northern Calcareous Alps as a starved basin in the Kimmeridgian (Fig. 2). This basin contains the earliest ophiolitic detritus from the accreted and obducted Neotethys Ocean floor (Missoni, 2003). In the Tirolic units of the Northern Calcareous Alps the
establishment of the shallow-water Plassen Carbonate Platform started at the frontal parts of the rising and advancing nappes (Gawlick et al., 2002, 2005). From this position, the progradation of several independent platforms took place towards the adjacent radiolarite basins (Gawlick and Frisch, 2003; Gawlick and Schlagintweit, 2006; Gawlick et al., 2005, 2007a, 2012). This resulted in a complex basin-and-rise topography with different types of sediments in shallow-water and deep-water areas (Gawlick and Schlagintweit, 2006). In the Kimmeridgian a huge carbonate platform was formed in the upper Tirolic unit, whereas in the lower Tirolic unit shallow- water carbonates were restricted to its northern part (Gawlick et al., 2007a). The whole Plassen Carbonate Platform cycle lasted from the Kimmeridgian until the late early Berriasian platform drowning (Gawlick and Schlagintweit, 2006).
Description of the studied localities
All studied localities belong to the Hallstatt Mélange around the village of Obersdorf north of Bad Mitterndorf (Fig. 3). For a more detailed description of the geology of the area, the Late Triassic to Late Jurassic sedimentary succession, and radiolarian and conodont dating, see O’Dogherty and Gawlick (2008).
Kumitzberg.—TheLateTriassicHallstatt Limestoneblock of Mt. Kumitzberg is surrounded by a grassland area without outcropping sedimentary rocks (Fig. 3).Only small pieces of dark- gray to black radiolarites can be foundatthe westernbaseof Mt. Kumitzberg.During the reconstruction of a small bus station in the excavation hole the contact between the Hallstatt Limestone block and the underlying dark-gray to black radiolarite was visible. The contact between the Hallstatt Limestone block and the radiolarite is erosive. This clearly indicates that the massive limestone block cut deep into the radiolarite succession. Therefore the age of the radiolarites is slightly older than the time of its emplacement. The unlaminated and massive dark-gray radiolarite beds are intercalated by thin layers of cherty shales. Only one sample (EW-158) was collected from this locality.
Steinwand north.—A slightly folded, relative thick radiolarite succession is preserved in a valley between the Steinwand and the Mischenirwiese (Fig. 3), on the southeastern slope of Mount Kampl. This succession occurs on top of the Late Triassic (Rhaetian) lagoonal Dachstein Limestone of the Steinwand (Fig. 4). The overlying Early Jurassic interval is covered by
29
Figure 3. Topography and simplified geology of the study area, showing sample locations (after O’Dogherty and Gawlick, 2008). The plus signs indicate positions of the investigated samples below the Kumitzberg, northwest of Krautmoos, and southeast of the Mischenirwiese and north of the Steinwand. Photo below the map shows the study area as viewed from Mount Kampl to the southwest. The hilly area with dense forest and grassland consists of Jurassic cherty sediments with incorporated mass flows and slides of Hallstatt Limestones. The contact between matrix and blocks or complete sections is visible only in areas with steeper slopes or valleys, or anthropogenic excavations.
Quaternary deposits, but in rare cases some relics of the red nodular limestones of the Adnet Formation occur in the grass- land below the dark-gray bedded radiolarite succession. Lower to Middle Jurassic condensed red limestones are well preserved on the southeastern slope of Mount Kampl on top of the Norian/ Rhaetian lagoonal Dachstein Limestone. This series represents the northeastern part of the syncline structure between the Steinwand and Mount Kampl. The lowermost part of the radiolarite succession (sample
BMW-28, Fig. 4) outcrops near the entrance of the valley and yielded the oldest assemblage, whereas the youngest part is preserved in the core of the syncline (sample BMW-35, Fig. 4). The thickness of this black radiolarite succession is nearly 100meters. Intercalated mass-flow deposits aremissing in contrast to equivalent successions to the east. Radiolarian dating proves a continuous radiolarite deposition fromBathonian to theOxfordian. At the end of the valley, near a spring, a small outcrop of gray bioturbated cherty limestones yielded the youngest radiolarians in this area (sample BMW-33). This clearly demonstrates that the radiolarite succession in the valley is separated fromthe area of the Mischenirwiese by a young fault.
Area between Krautmoos and Mischenirwiese.—The area northwest of Krautmoos (Fig. 3) is characterized by a thick succession of mass-flow deposits with intercalated radiolarite matrix. In a few outcrops, below and between the amalgamated
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208