search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Frederickson and Cifelli—Cretaceous lungfishes Ceratodus nirumbee new species Figure 2.8, 2.9, Supplemental Data 6, Table 1


Holotype.—OMNH 34765, a complete right prearticular plate, Early Cretaceous (Albian, see Cifelli and Davis, 2015), lower unit VII (stratigraphic nomenclature of Ostrom, 1970), Cloverly Formation; OMNH locality V1061, 11 km east northeast of Edgar, Carbon County, Montana, U.S.A.


Diagnosis.—A tall-crested, medium-sized ceratodontid most closely resembling C. fossanovum, differing in the extreme mesial placement of Ruge’s Ridge; ridge crests more distinct, particularly near area of common origin, with narrower crest Cp and better developed C3-Cp notch; and a more angulate, less rounded posterolingual margin.


Occurrence.—Known only from the type locality, Cloverly Formation (Albian, Early Cretaceous), Carbon County, Montana, U.S.A.


Description.—OMNH 34765 is a complete right prearticular tooth plate with fused prearticular; it is slightly water-worn, lacking the anterior and posterior processes of the prearticular, and has well-developed occlusal wear. The plate bears four tall, well-defined ridge crests and a small crushing surface at the origin of crests C1-C2. Crest C1 bears three denticles in a single row; four denticles in a non-linear arrangement are present on C2;C3-C4 begin with double rows of denticles and have an irregular arrangement. OMNH 34765 represents a medium- sized lungfish, larger than Potamoceratodus guentheri and smaller than Ceratodus gustasoni, most resembling C. fossanovum from the Morrison Formation. OMNH 34765 possesses similar ridge crest angles (Table 1) to C. fossanovum, and falls within the range of variation for this species (see values for C. “guentheri” in Kirkland, 1987). However, OMNH 34765 differs from C. fossanovum based on suite of characters not found on any of the published specimens from the Jurassic. Ceratodus fossanovum possesses a well-developed crushing platform on the lingual side of prearticular tooth plates, joining the origins of the ridges for the C3 and Cp ridge (Kirkland, 1987, plate 1D), which is not developed in OMNH 34675. This plat- form can be seen in lingual view as a second convexity, more posterior to the tall platform formed from the intersection of the C1 and C2 ridges in C. fossanovum. The notch (sulcus) between the C3 and Cp ridge crests is deeper and better developed in OMNH34765 than in C. fossanovum. On the inferior surface of the underlying prearticular (Fig. 2.9), OMNH 34765 has a well- developed median trough or groove that terminates mesially at Ruge’s Ridge, which is more distally placed in other species.


Etymology.—From the Crow, Nirumbee, Little People of the Pryor Mountains; dwarves or devils with a ferocious tempera- ment, sharp teeth, and a predilection for meat (Murray, 2008). Allusion is to the presumed feeding habits of the species and to proximity of the type locality to the Pryor Mountains, specifi- cally what is now Chief Plenty Coups State Park, where the legendary Crow leader drew inspiration from the Nirumbee (Linderman, 1957).


153


Remarks.—Ceratodus nirumbee cannot be readily confused with the other ceratodontid known from the Cloverly Forma-


tion, C. frazieri Ostrom, 1970, which is characterized by large, flat-crowned tooth plates (Fig. 2.12–2.13). Oreska et al. (2013) mentioned two ceratodontids among the specimens they col- lected via underwater screen washing of rock matrix from the Cloverly Formation: C. frazieri and Ceratodus cf. P. guentheri.


The specimens are too fragmentary to be identified with con- fidence, but USNM 546679 (Oreska et al., 2013, fig. 5B) much resembles OMNH 34765, holotype of C. nirumbee, particularly in the presence of a long, thin C3 ridge crest that is subequal to the C2 ridge crest. We provisionally consider this specimen, at least, as belonging to the species. Similarly, Bonde (2008) and Bonde et al. (2008) briefly described and figured a pterygo- palatine tooth plate (VOF-2005-03-2A-001) from the Albian- aged Willow Tank Formation of southern Nevada, similar in shape to the holotype of C. nirumbee. If this specimen does in fact represent an upper plate for C. nirumbee, it vastly increases our knowledge of the morphology for this species. Until more robust comparative studies can be done, we informally attribute this specimen to the species as well.


Ceratodus kempae new species Figure 2.10, 2.11, Supplemental Data 7, Table 1


Holotype.—BYU 20814, right pterygopalatine tooth plate and attached pterygopalatine, complete except for C1; Early Cretaceous (Valanginian, see Hendrix et al., 2015); BYU locality 1783, 16.7 km southwest of Cisco, Grand County, Utah, U.S.A.


Diagnosis.—Moderate-sized species of Ceratodus, slightly smaller than C. gustasoni, which it resembles in having little surface relief on tooth plate crowns, lack of denticles on ridge crests, obvious circumdenteonal islands present on occlusal surface, and ridges that narrow and are pointed labially. Differs from C. gustasoni and other flat-plated North American species of Ceratodus in having less obtuse C1-Cp angle, slightly better- developed ridge crests, serrated labial plate margin (angulate ridge termini separated by angulate notches), and presence of prominent vertical wear facets between ridges.


Occurrence.—Known only from the type locality, Yellow Cat Member, Cedar Mountain Formation (Valanginian, Lower Cretaceous), Grand County, Utah, U.S.A.


Description.—BYU 20814 is missing C1 of what was originally a five-crested right pterygopalatine tooth plate. The preserved part of the mesial margin indicates angle ABC to be 111° (Table 1), less than the flat-crowned C. gustasoni or C. frazieri (Kirkland, 1987, table 1). The specimen is of moderate size, considerably smaller than in C. frazieri and larger than P. guentheri or C. kirklandi. The occlusal surface is low and undulating, with a modestly developed central mound, where the ridges originate at the mesiolingual corner of the plate. Ridge crests are faint but are better developed than in the most closely similar taxon, C. gustasoni (Fig. 2.14, 2.15). All of the labial ridge tips are distinctly angular, as are the intervening notches, such that the labial margin of the plate has a serrated


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208