search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
124


Journal of Paleontology 91(1):116–145


the most parsimonious solution is to followMelchin et al. (2011) and assign the entire retiolitid group (the clade above node 1) to the subfamily Retiolitinae. If further subdivision of this subfamily were to be proposed (at the level of tribe), we suggest that it should reflect the sister-group status of the two clades that include Pseudoplegmatograptus, Stomatograptus,and Retiolites on the one hand, and Aeroretiolites, Eorograptus, Rotaretiolites, Paraplectograptus, Sokolovograptus,and their “plectograptine” descendants on the other, as well as the paraphyletic, stem-group status of Pseudoretiolites (Fig. 5.1).


Retiolitine diversity and disparity in the Llandovery


Our data provide important new insights into the pattern of diversification of the Retiolitinae in Aeronian and early Telychian time (Figs. 3, 6). In particular, our data show that at least eight different retiolitine species belonging to four different genera occur within the L. convolutus Zone, whereas previously only two species of Pseudoretiolites had been identified with certainty from from this interval. We show that a significant disparity of retiolitine forms, ranging from large and complex species, such as Pseudoretiolites decurtatus, to the small and highly simplified form of Eorograptus spirifer, already existed by mid-Aeronian time. As noted above, there have been almost no graptolites


recovered from the S. sedgwickii Zone in Arctic Canada, despite considerable sampling effort. This appears to be the result of unfavourable preservational conditions in this interval (including a lack of concretions), which means that the lack of retiolitine species discovered in that interval in this study is clearly a tapho- nomic artefact. Our data, therefore, provide no new insights into the details of changing retiolitine faunas through the sedgwicki extinction event that characterizes the late Aeronian (e.g., Melchin et al., 1998; Štorch and Frýda, 2012). Our study does, however, provide data that allow us to reconstruct the phylogeny of retiolitine lineages through this time interval (Fig. 6). The morphology of many retiolitine species that occur in


later Llandovery-Wenlock strata have been described and illustrated by Lenz and Melchin (1987a), Lenz and Kozłowska- Dawidziuk (2001), Kozłowska-Dawidziuk and Lenz (2001), Lenz and Kozłowska (2007), and Lenz et al. (2012). Melchin (1989) documented the ranges of retiolitines through the Llandovery of Arctic Canada based on flattened material. These studies, together with our additional unpublished data, show that the following genera occur in mid-late Telychian strata in Arctic Canada: Retiolites Barrande, 1850, Stomatograptus Tullberg, 1883, Paraplectograptus Příbyl, 1948, Pseudoplectograptus Obut and Zaslavskaya, 1983, Sokolovograptus Obut and


Zaslavskaya, 1983, Pileograptus Lenz and Kozłowska, 2007, and Giganteograptus Lenz and Kozłowska, 2007. Detailed SEM studies on Retiolites and Stomatograptus from Arctic Canada have been carried out by Bates and Kirk (1997).


Locality and repository information


All of the material used in the present study has been chemically isolated from calcite concretions and studied using stereopair scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Much of the material was collected from from Cape Manning (Figs. 1, 3;CM 75o27’N, 94o21’W). Additional material came from Rookery Creek, Cornwallis Island (RC 75o22.5’N, 95o41’W), Snow- blind Creek, Cornwallis Island (SC 75o11’N, 93o56’W), Dundas Island (~76o05’N, 95o59’W), Cape Sir John Franklin, Devon Island (SJF 76o42.5’N, 96o53’W), and an unknown locality on Cornwallis Island. See Appendix 1 for further sample details. Illustrated specimens are given Geological Survey of


Canada (GSC) numbers, and are housed with The National Collection of Invertebrate and Plant Fossils of the Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, K1A 0E8. Collection localities and abbreviations are as follows: Cape


Manning (MCM; CM88), Snowblind Creek (LL1 and LL3; MSC; ML64–85; SB), and Rookery Creek (MRC), all three from Cornwallis Island (see Fig. 1). The other two localities are Cape Sir John Franklin (SJF) on westernmost Devon Island, and Dundas Island (DIS).


Systematic paleontology


Throughout the Systematics section, for species with numerous synonymies, only the original type publication and those con- sidered to be the most informative are listed. Morphological terminology follows that outlined by Bates et al. (2005) and the family-level systematics follows Melchin et al. (2011). 2TRD refers to two-thecae repeat distance (Howe, 1983). We introduce a new morphological term “pseudolip” to describe the lip-like, looping list structure underlying the apertural lip, attached to the lateral thecal apertural lists, which has been observed in our specimens of Pseudoretiolities cf. tianbaensis (Fig. 7.5, 7.7). The structure has an open space between it and the true apertural lip.


Superfamily Retiolitoidea Lapworth, 1873


Definition.—The most recent common ancestor of Metabolograptus ojsuensis and Retiolites geinitzianus and all of its descendants (Node 3, figs. 2 and 3 inMelchin et al., 2011).


Figure 8. Scanning electron microscopy images of Pseudoretiolites perlatus Nicholson, 1868: (1, 2) GSC137613, (1) beautifully preserved specimen with seven pairs of thecae, no visible sicula, (2) enlargement of two thecae showing zigzag thecal floor, part of thecal mid-ventral list (a), pleural list (b), and lateral apertural rod (c). Note zigzag distal part of thecal mid-ventral list, section MCM2-98, 59.1–59.2 m, L. convolutus Zone; (3) GSC137614, ancora umbrella with four spiral whorls, prosicula with fine longitudinal rods, and partial preservation of the metasicula (arrow), which is more complete than usual for this species, section DIS92-11, 17.5–18.0 m, L. convolutus Zone; (4) GSC78426, fairly mature specimen with at least six pairs of thecae, well-preserved prosicula, at least one stoma, ML64, upper, L. convolutus Zone, re-illustrated from Lenz and Melchin (1987a); (5, 8) GSC137615, specimen with two pairs of thecae, well-developed ancora umbrella with four spiral whorls, well-preserved prosicula, (5) oblique proximal view, (8) stereopair of profile view, section MRC02, L. convolutus Zone; (6) GSC 137616, stereopair of immature specimen, showing well-developed ancora umbrella with four complete spiral whorls, without preserved sicula, section MCM2-98, 59.1–59.2 m, L. convolutus Zone; (7) GSC 137617, stereopair of immature specimen with well developed ancora umbrella with five spiral whorls, base of theca11 mid-ventral list beginning within ancora umbrella (arrow), section MCM2-98, 54.1–59.2, L. convolutus Zone.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208